• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析农民对非点源污染控制和管理的环境行为:计划行为理论与保护动机理论的整合。

Analysis of the environmental behavior of farmers for non-point source pollution control and management: An integration of the theory of planned behavior and the protection motivation theory.

机构信息

College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100 Shaanxi, China; Shaanxi Engineering Research Center of Circular Agriculture, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China.

College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100 Shaanxi, China; Shaanxi Engineering Research Center of Circular Agriculture, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2019 May 1;237:15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.070. Epub 2019 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.070
PMID:30776770
Abstract

Agricultural non-point source (NPS) pollution in water source protection areas poses serious challenges for governments in developing countries. It is important to consider the environmental behavior of farmers when exploring the causes of NPS pollution as well as when establishing scientific controls and management measures. However, the poor understanding of factors influencing the environmental behavior of farmers and the lack of a suitable environmental socio-psychological model limit the application of the environmental behavior of farmers in NPS pollution management. In this study, we therefore integrated the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and the protection motivation theory (PMT) to identify the main determinants of the NPS pollution-related environmental behavior and intention of farmers in the Water Source Area of the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project in China. Results indicated that the integrated model provided a better understanding of the environmental behavior and intention of farmers than that provided by each component when used individually, and revealed that farmers perceived that the susceptibility and severity of threats caused by water deterioration influenced environmental intention through the mediating effects of subjective norm and attitude toward adopting pro-environmental behavior. At the same time, the perceived vulnerability of farmers was relatively high and their perceived severity was relatively low. Furthermore, the subjective norm, attitude, self-efficacy (i.e., the perceived behavioral control), and response efficacy positively and significantly influenced intention. However, response cost had a significantly negative effect on intention. Among them, subjective norm had the largest effect on intention. Intention was the key determinant for the actual environmental behavior of farmers, while self-efficacy also had a significantly positive effect on behavior. Managing and controlling agricultural NPS pollution requires a multi-disciplinary and comprehensive approach. Therefore, an integrated theoretical framework was developed in this study by integrating TPB and PMT to gain insight into the environmental behaviors and intention of farmers. The results provided a theoretical basis for NPS pollution control.

摘要

农业面源(NPS)污染对发展中国家的政府在水源保护区构成了严重挑战。在探索 NPS 污染的原因以及建立科学的控制和管理措施时,考虑农民的环境行为非常重要。然而,由于对影响农民环境行为的因素缺乏了解以及缺乏合适的环境社会心理学模型,限制了农民环境行为在 NPS 污染管理中的应用。因此,在本研究中,我们将计划行为理论(TPB)和保护动机理论(PMT)相结合,以确定中国南水北调中线工程水源区农民与 NPS 污染相关的环境行为和意图的主要决定因素。结果表明,与单独使用每个组成部分相比,集成模型提供了对农民环境行为和意图的更好理解,并且表明农民认为水质恶化造成的威胁的易感性和严重性通过主观规范和对采用有利于环境的行为的态度的中介效应对环境意图产生影响。同时,农民的感知脆弱性相对较高,而感知严重性相对较低。此外,主观规范、态度、自我效能(即感知行为控制)和响应效能对意图具有积极且显著的影响。但是,响应成本对意图有显著的负面影响。其中,主观规范对意图的影响最大。意图是农民实际环境行为的关键决定因素,而自我效能也对行为具有显著的积极影响。管理和控制农业 NPS 污染需要多学科和综合的方法。因此,本研究通过整合 TPB 和 PMT 来深入了解农民的环境行为和意图,构建了一个综合的理论框架。研究结果为 NPS 污染控制提供了理论基础。

相似文献

1
Analysis of the environmental behavior of farmers for non-point source pollution control and management: An integration of the theory of planned behavior and the protection motivation theory.分析农民对非点源污染控制和管理的环境行为:计划行为理论与保护动机理论的整合。
J Environ Manage. 2019 May 1;237:15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.070. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
2
Analysis of the environmental behavior of farmers for non-point source pollution control and management in a water source protection area in China.分析中国水源保护区农民对非点源污染控制和管理的环境行为。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Aug 15;633:1126-1135. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.273. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
3
Analysis of the ecological conservation behavior of farmers in payment for ecosystem service programs in eco-environmentally fragile areas using social psychology models.运用社会心理学模型分析生态环境脆弱地区生态服务付费项目中农民的生态保护行为。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Apr 15;550:382-390. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.152. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
4
Drivers of farmers' intention to use integrated pest management: Integrating theory of planned behavior and norm activation model.农民使用病虫害综合防治意愿的驱动因素:计划行为理论与规范激活模型的整合。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Apr 15;236:328-339. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.097. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
5
Assessing farmers' intention towards conservation agriculture by using the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior.采用扩展计划行为理论评估农民对保护性农业的意愿。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Feb 15;280:111654. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111654. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
6
Assessing Influence Mechanism of Green Utilization of Agricultural Wastes in Five Provinces of China through Farmers' Motivation-Cognition-Behavior.基于农户动机-认知-行为的中国五省农业废弃物绿色利用影响机制评估
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 12;17(10):3381. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103381.
7
Investigating Rural Domestic Waste Sorting Intentions Based on an Integrative Framework of Planned Behavior Theory and Normative Activation Models: Evidence from Guanzhong Basin, China.基于计划行为理论和规范激活模型的农村户垃圾分类意愿研究——来自中国关中盆地的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 7;17(13):4887. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134887.
8
Integrating the norm activation model and theory of planned behaviour to investigate farmer pro-environmental behavioural intention.将规范激活模型与计划行为理论相结合,以调查农民的亲环境行为意向。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 5;13(1):5584. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32831-x.
9
Modeling farmers' responsible environmental attitude and behaviour: a case from Iran.农户负责任环境态度和行为的建模:来自伊朗的案例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Sep;26(27):28146-28161. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06040-x. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
10
Long-term control of non-point source pollution by adjusting human environmental behavior in watershed-a new perspective.流域调整人类环境行为对非点源污染的长期控制——新视角。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Nov;30(54):116239-116251. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30496-7. Epub 2023 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Individual perceptions of renewable energy investment in Somali firms.索马里企业对可再生能源投资的个人看法。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 26;15(1):31400. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11581-y.
2
Integrated export instream coefficient model for accurate nonpoint source pollution estimation and management in the Yellow River Basin.黄河流域非点源污染精确估算与管理的集成出口河段系数模型
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 20;15(1):26302. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99552-1.
3
Configuration analysis of crop-pollination service management: a novel insight from the theory of planned behavior.
作物授粉服务管理的配置分析:基于计划行为理论的新见解
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 11;20(7):e0326226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326226. eCollection 2025.
4
The role of social-psychological factors in the adoption of push-pull technology by small-scale farmers in East Africa: Application of the theory of planned behavior.社会心理因素在东非小规模农户采用推拉技术中的作用:计划行为理论的应用
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 26;11(1):e41449. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41449. eCollection 2025 Jan 15.
5
The impact of social networks on rural residents' engagement in living environment upgrade: An integrated analysis drawing on social network theory and the theory of planned behavior.社交网络对农村居民参与生活环境改善的影响:基于社交网络理论和计划行为理论的综合分析
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 22;20(1):e0312779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312779. eCollection 2025.
6
The impact of epidemic experiences on biosecurity behavior of pig farmers: an analysis based on protection motivation theory.疫情经历对养猪户生物安全行为的影响:基于保护动机理论的分析
One Health. 2024 Nov 17;19:100936. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100936. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Role of self-actualization in green production behavior: Evidence from rice smallholders in China.自我实现对绿色生产行为的作用:来自中国水稻小农户的证据。
Heliyon. 2024 May 9;10(11):e30950. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30950. eCollection 2024 Jun 15.
8
(Mis)matched direct and moderating relationships among pro-environmental attitudes, environmental efficacy, and pro-environmental behaviors across and within 11 countries.在 11 个国家中,跨国家和国家内的亲环境态度、环境效能感和亲环境行为之间存在(不)匹配的直接和调节关系。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 18;19(6):e0304945. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304945. eCollection 2024.
9
Monitoring grey water footprint and associated environmental controls in agricultural watershed.监测农业流域中的灰水足迹及其相关环境控制。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(7):11334-11348. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-31961-7. Epub 2024 Jan 13.
10
Integrated prediction of water pollution and risk assessment of water system connectivity based on dynamic model average and model selection criteria.基于动态模型平均和模型选择准则的水污染综合预测及水系连通性风险评估
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 19;18(10):e0287209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287209. eCollection 2023.