Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Department, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, Italy.
Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Department, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, Italy.
Am J Cardiol. 2019 May 1;123(9):1470-1477. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
Doppler echocardiography can provide reliable and repeatable measures of cardiac index (CI), whereas lung ultrasound (LUS) represents a quantitative approach to assess pulmonary congestion. We tested the hypothesis that simultaneous assessment of CI and LUS during exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) may define heart failure (HF) outpatients with different risk of adverse outcome. Standard transthoracic echocardiography and LUS (B-lines) evaluation were assessed during semisupine ESE. CI and B-lines were measured at baseline and peak exercise. Resting plasma B-type natriuretic peptide levels were also evaluated. We enrolled 105 HF patients (87 males; age 62 ± 11 years; New York Heart Association class I to III) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (30 ± 7%). Patients were classified into 4 profiles: (1) peak CI ≥4.0 l/min/m and peak B-lines <15 (no evidence of congestion or hypoperfusion, n = 47); (2) peak CI ≥4.0 l/min/m and peak B-lines ≥15 (congestion with adequate perfusion, n = 23); (3) peak CI <4.0 l/min/m and peak B-lines <15 (hypoperfusion without congestion, n = 13); and (4) peak CI <4.0 l/min/m and peak B-lines ≥15 (congestion and hypoperfusion, n = 22). There were 21 cardiovascular deaths and 18 hospitalizations for worsening HF during a median follow-up of 29 months. Multivariate predictors of the combined end point were peak hemodynamic profiles (hazard ratio [HR] 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19 to 2.21; p = 0.002), B-type natriuretic peptide (HR 1.00, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.01; p = 0.001), and rest E/e' (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.15; p = 0.002). Survival analysis showed a worse survival in patients with ESE-derived D profile, followed by patients with C, B, and A profile (log-rank: chi-square = 40.5; p <0.0001). In conclusion, dual evaluation of CI and LUS during ESE is useful for risk stratification of HF patients with reduced ejection fraction. Evidence of pulmonary congestion and low CI at peak ESE identifies a subgroup with a very high risk of adverse outcome.
多普勒超声心动图可提供可靠且可重复的心脏指数(CI)测量值,而肺部超声(LUS)则代表了一种定量评估肺充血的方法。我们检验了一个假设,即在运动超声心动图(ESE)期间同时评估 CI 和 LUS,可能可以确定具有不同不良预后风险的心力衰竭(HF)门诊患者。在半卧位 ESE 期间评估标准经胸超声心动图和 LUS(B 线)评估。在基线和峰值运动时测量 CI 和 B 线。还评估了静息血浆 B 型利钠肽水平。我们纳入了 105 名 HF 患者(87 名男性;年龄 62±11 岁;纽约心脏协会心功能分级 I 至 III 级),其左心室射血分数降低(30±7%)。患者分为 4 种类型:(1)峰值 CI≥4.0 l/min/m,峰值 B 线<15(无充血或灌注不足的证据,n=47);(2)峰值 CI≥4.0 l/min/m,峰值 B 线≥15(充血伴充分灌注,n=23);(3)峰值 CI<4.0 l/min/m,峰值 B 线<15(无充血的灌注不足,n=13);(4)峰值 CI<4.0 l/min/m,峰值 B 线≥15(充血和灌注不足,n=22)。中位随访 29 个月期间,共有 21 例心血管死亡和 18 例 HF 恶化住院。联合终点的多变量预测因素为峰值血流动力学特征(危险比 [HR] 1.62,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.19 至 2.21;p=0.002)、B 型利钠肽(HR 1.00,95% CI 1.00 至 1.01;p=0.001)和静息 E/e'(HR 1.09,95% CI 1.03 至 1.15;p=0.002)。生存分析显示,ESE 衍生的 D 型患者的生存情况更差,其次是 C、B 和 A 型患者(对数秩检验:卡方=40.5;p<0.0001)。总之,在 ESE 期间对 CI 和 LUS 进行双重评估,有助于对射血分数降低的 HF 患者进行危险分层。ESE 时出现肺部充血和 CI 峰值降低的证据,可识别出具有极高不良预后风险的亚组。