Ram Hadar, Struyf Dieter, Vervliet Bram, Menahem Gal, Liberman Nira
1 School of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
2 Centre for the Psychology of Learning and Experimental Psychopathology, Leuven University, Belgium.
Exp Psychol. 2019 Jan;66(1):23-39. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000429.
People apply what they learn from experience not only to the experienced stimuli, but also to novel stimuli. But what determines how widely people generalize what they have learned? Using a predictive learning paradigm, we examined the hypothesis that a low (vs. high) probability of an outcome following a predicting stimulus would widen generalization. In three experiments, participants learned which stimulus predicted an outcome (S+) and which stimulus did not (S-) and then indicated how much they expected the outcome after each of eight novel stimuli ranging in perceptual similarity to S+ and S-. The stimuli were rings of different sizes and the outcome was a picture of a lightning bolt. As hypothesized, a lower probability of the outcome widened generalization. That is, novel stimuli that were similar to S+ (but not to S-) produced expectations for the outcome that were as high as those associated with S+.
人们不仅将从经验中学到的东西应用于经历过的刺激,还应用于新的刺激。但是,是什么决定了人们对所学知识的泛化程度呢?我们使用一种预测学习范式,检验了这样一个假设:在一个预测性刺激之后出现某种结果的概率较低(相对于较高)会扩大泛化范围。在三个实验中,参与者学习哪种刺激预示着某种结果(S+),哪种刺激不会(S-),然后指出在八个与S+和S-在感知相似性上各不相同的新刺激之后,他们对该结果的预期程度。刺激物是不同大小的圆环,结果是一张闪电的图片。正如假设的那样,结果出现的较低概率扩大了泛化范围。也就是说,与S+相似(但与S-不相似)的新刺激产生的对结果的预期,与那些与S+相关的预期一样高。