• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 FDA 对经粘膜快速释放型芬太尼产品的风险评估和缓解策略。

Assessment of the FDA Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy for Transmucosal Immediate-Release Fentanyl Products.

机构信息

Center for Drug Safety and Effectiveness, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.

Center for Science in the Public Interest, Washington, DC.

出版信息

JAMA. 2019 Feb 19;321(7):676-685. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0235.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2019.0235
PMID:30778596
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6439622/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Transmucosal immediate-release fentanyls (TIRFs), indicated solely for breakthrough cancer pain in opioid-tolerant patients, are subject to a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) to prevent them from being prescribed inappropriately.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate knowledge assessments of pharmacists, prescribers, and patients regarding appropriate TIRF use; to describe sponsor assessments, based on claims data, of whether the REMS program was meeting its goals; and to characterize how the FDA responded to REMS assessments.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Qualitative analysis of 4877 pages of FDA documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, including 6 annual REMS assessment reports (2012-2017), FDA evaluations of these reports, and FDA-sponsor correspondence about safety issues.

EXPOSURE

A REMS program to reduce the risk of adverse outcomes, including misuse, abuse, addiction, and overdose, arising from use of TIRFs.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

(1) Knowledge assessments of pharmacists, prescribers, and patients; (2) survey and claims-based prescribing assessments; (3) FDA and TIRF sponsor communications; (4) modifications to the REMS program; and (5) disenrollment of noncompliant prescribers.

RESULTS

Twelve months after initiation of the program, 24 of 302 pharmacists (7.9%), 35 of 302 prescribers (11.6%), and 5 of 192 patients (2.6%) incorrectly reported that TIRFs can be prescribed to opioid-nontolerant patients, with similar levels of misunderstanding maintained in the subsequent reports. At 60 months, product-specific analyses of claims data indicated that between 34.6% and 55.4% of patients prescribed TIRFs were opioid-nontolerant. In the 48-month survey, 106 of 310 prescribers (34.2%) reported prescribing TIRFs for opioid-tolerant patients with chronic, noncancer pain; at 60 months, 54 of 302 prescribers (18.4%) and 148 of 310 patients (47.7%) erroneously reported that TIRFs were FDA-approved for such use. Over the 60-month period examined, there were few substantive changes made to the REMS to address evidence of high rates of off-label TIRF use, and, although the REMS program had a noncompliance plan, there was no report of prescribers being disenrolled for inappropriate prescribing.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this review of FDA documents pertaining to the TIRF REMS, surveys of pharmacists, prescribers, and patients reflected generally high levels of knowledge regarding proper TIRF prescribing, yet some survey items as well as claims-based analyses indicated substantial rates of inappropriate TIRF use. Despite these findings, the FDA did not require substantive changes to the program.

摘要

重要性

仅用于缓解阿片类药物耐受患者爆发性癌痛的经黏膜快速释放芬太尼(TIRFs)受到美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)风险评估和缓解策略(REMS)的限制,以防止不当处方。

目的

评估药剂师、处方者和患者对 TIRF 合理使用的知识评估;根据索赔数据描述赞助商评估,以确定 REMS 计划是否达到其目标;并描述 FDA 对 REMS 评估的反应。

设计、地点和参与者:通过信息自由法案请求获得的 4877 页 FDA 文件的定性分析,包括 6 份年度 REMS 评估报告(2012-2017 年)、FDA 对这些报告的评估以及 FDA-赞助商关于安全问题的通信。

暴露

REMS 计划旨在降低因使用 TIRFs 而产生的不良后果的风险,包括误用、滥用、成瘾和过量。

主要结果和措施

(1)药剂师、处方者和患者的知识评估;(2)调查和基于索赔的处方评估;(3)FDA 和 TIRF 赞助商的沟通;(4)REMS 计划的修改;(5)不遵守规定的处方者被除名。

结果

计划启动后 12 个月,302 名药剂师中的 24 名(7.9%)、302 名处方者中的 35 名(11.6%)和 192 名患者中的 5 名(2.6%)错误地报告 TIRFs 可用于非阿片类药物耐受患者,随后的报告中也保持了类似的误解水平。在 60 个月时,对索赔数据的特定产品分析表明,接受 TIRF 处方的患者中有 34.6%至 55.4%为非阿片类药物耐受。在 48 个月的调查中,310 名处方者中的 106 名(34.2%)报告为阿片类药物耐受的慢性非癌痛患者开 TIRF;在 60 个月时,302 名处方者中的 54 名(18.4%)和 310 名患者中的 148 名(47.7%)错误地报告 TIRF 已获得此类用途的 FDA 批准。在检查的 60 个月期间,针对高比例的 TIRF 标签外使用证据,对 REMS 进行了很少的实质性更改,尽管 REMS 计划有不合规计划,但没有报告处方者因不当处方而被除名。

结论和相关性

在对 FDA 与 TIRF REMS 相关文件的审查中,药剂师、处方者和患者的调查反映了对 TIRF 正确处方的普遍较高水平的知识,但一些调查项目和基于索赔的分析表明,TIRF 的使用存在大量不适当的情况。尽管有这些发现,FDA 并未要求对该计划进行实质性更改。

相似文献

1
Assessment of the FDA Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy for Transmucosal Immediate-Release Fentanyl Products.评估 FDA 对经粘膜快速释放型芬太尼产品的风险评估和缓解策略。
JAMA. 2019 Feb 19;321(7):676-685. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0235.
2
Evaluation of the Extended-Release/Long-Acting Opioid Prescribing Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Program by the US Food and Drug Administration: A Review.美国食品和药物管理局对延长释放/长效阿片类药物处方风险评估和缓解策略计划的评估:综述。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Feb 1;180(2):301-309. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.5459.
3
Association of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Program With Transmucosal Fentanyl Prescribing.风险评估和缓解策略计划与经黏膜芬太尼处方的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e191340. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1340.
4
Primary care physician opinion survey on FDA opioid risk evaluation and mitigation strategies.关于美国食品药品监督管理局阿片类药物风险评估与缓解策略的基层医疗医生意见调查
J Opioid Manag. 2011 Mar-Apr;7(2):109-15. doi: 10.5055/jom.2011.0053.
5
Shared risk evaluation mitigation strategy for all immediate-release transmucosal fentanyl dosage forms.所有速释经粘膜芬太尼剂型的共同风险评估缓解策略。
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2012 Jun;26(2):123-6. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2012.677946.
6
The Prevalence of Off-label Prescribing of Transmucosal Immediate-Release Fentanyl in France.法国透皮速释型芬太尼的标签外使用情况。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Jun;63(6):980-987. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.02.016. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
7
Effectiveness of Risk Minimization Measures for Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FENTORA) in Canada: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation Using Surveys, Medical Chart Records and Web Surveillance.加拿大丁丙诺啡颊片剂(FENTORA)风险最小化措施的有效性:使用调查、医疗图表记录和网络监测的混合方法评估。
Drug Saf. 2020 Feb;43(2):163-177. doi: 10.1007/s40264-019-00882-7.
8
ER/LA Opioid Analgesics REMS: Overview of Ongoing Assessments of Its Progress and Its Impact on Health Outcomes.缓释/长效阿片类镇痛药风险评估与缓解策略(REMS):对其进展及对健康结果影响的持续评估概述
Pain Med. 2017 Jan 1;18(1):78-85. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw129.
9
SCOPE of Pain: An Evaluation of an Opioid Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Continuing Education Program.疼痛范围:阿片类药物风险评估与缓解策略继续教育项目评估
Pain Med. 2016 Jan;17(1):52-63. doi: 10.1111/pme.12878.
10
Risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS): educating the prescriber.风险评估和缓解策略(REMS):教育处方医生。
Drug Saf. 2012 Feb 1;35(2):91-104. doi: 10.2165/11597840-000000000-00000.

引用本文的文献

1
Abuse potential of fentanyl and fentanyl analogues.芬太尼及芬太尼类似物的滥用可能性。
Bioimpacts. 2024;14(6):27691. doi: 10.34172/bi.2024.27691. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
2
Assessment of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) for prasugrel (EFFIENT): A narrative review.美国食品药品监督管理局对普拉格雷(Effient)的风险评估与降低策略(REMS)评估:一项叙述性综述
Am Heart J Plus. 2024 Feb;38. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100359. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
3
Warning Labels as a Public Health Intervention: Effects and Challenges for Tobacco, Cannabis, and Opioid Medications.警示标签作为一种公共卫生干预措施:对烟草、大麻和阿片类药物的影响和挑战。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2024 May;45(1):425-442. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-060922-042254. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
4
Physician experiences with and perceptions of risk evaluation and mitigation strategy programs with elements to assure safe use.医生对包含确保安全使用要素的风险评估和缓解策略计划的经验和看法。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 6;18(7):e0288008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288008. eCollection 2023.
5
Abuse, dependence and withdrawal associated with fentanyl and the role of its (designated) route of administration: an analysis of spontaneous reports from Europe.芬太尼相关的滥用、依赖和戒断以及其(指定)给药途径的作用:来自欧洲自发报告的分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Feb;79(2):257-267. doi: 10.1007/s00228-022-03431-x. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
6
Assessment of Public Opinion on Transparency at the US Food and Drug Administration.公众对美国食品和药物管理局透明度的评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e220026. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0026.
7
Responding to the opioid crisis in North America and beyond: recommendations of the Stanford-Lancet Commission.应对北美及其他地区的阿片类药物危机:斯坦福-柳叶刀委员会的建议
Lancet. 2022 Feb 5;399(10324):555-604. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02252-2. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
8
Patient and Caregiver Experiences With and Perceptions of Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Programs With Elements to Assure Safe Use.患者和照护者对具有确保安全使用要素的风险评估和缓解策略计划的体验和看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2144386. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44386.
9
Risk Attenuation and Amplification in the U.S. Opioid Crisis.美国阿片类药物危机中的风险衰减和放大。
Risk Anal. 2022 Jul;42(7):1393-1408. doi: 10.1111/risa.13840. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
10
[Use of rapid-onset fentanyl preparations beyond indication : A random questionnaire survey among congress participants and pain physicians].超出适应症使用快速起效的芬太尼制剂:对会议参与者和疼痛科医生的随机问卷调查
Schmerz. 2021 Apr;35(2):114-123. doi: 10.1007/s00482-020-00503-8. Epub 2020 Sep 25.