• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险评估和缓解策略计划与经黏膜芬太尼处方的关联。

Association of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Program With Transmucosal Fentanyl Prescribing.

机构信息

Department of Patient Safety & Quality, Hackensack Meridian Health, Edison, New Jersey.

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e191340. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1340.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1340
PMID:30924899
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6450314/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Transmucosal immediate-release fentanyl (TIRF) drugs are potent, rapid-acting opioids approved to treat breakthrough pain in patients with cancer who are tolerant to other around-the-clock opioid analgesics. In March 2012, a US Food and Drug Administration-approved Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) was implemented, mandating prescribers, distributors, pharmacies, and patients to enroll in the REMS to prescribe, dispense, or receive TIRF drugs.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of the TIRF-REMS Access Program with TIRF prescribing.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cohort study using an interrupted time series analysis of TIRF prescriptions to Medicare Part D beneficiaries nationwide from 2010 to 2014. Data were analyzed from August 2017 through July 2018.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Prescribing of TIRF per 100 000 Medicare Part D beneficiaries, overall and stratified by cancer status; percentage of TIRF prescriptions for patients without cancer, overall and by brand; and percentage of TIRF prescriptions for patients without known opioid tolerance, defined as patients prescribed at least 60 morphine milligram equivalents per day, overall and by brand.

RESULTS

There were 99 601 TIRF prescriptions written by 8619 clinicians to 10 472 patients. Most of the patients (79%) were younger than 65 years (mean [SD] age, 56 [13] years), and most (67%) did not have cancer. Implementation of TIRF-REMS was associated with a 26.7% relative level decrease in TIRF prescribing (95% CI, -33.3% to -19.4%; P < .001) but was followed by 2.0% monthly increases in prescribing (95% CI, 1.3% to 2.7%; P < .001). Sensitivity analyses that accounted for overall opioid prescribing trends were consistent with these findings. Furthermore, there were no significant changes associated with REMS implementation in the level (0.47%; 95% CI, -5.36% to 4.69%; P = .85) or trend (0.16%; 95% CI, -0.06% to 0.37%; P = .15) of the percentage of prescriptions for patients without cancer. However, a sensitivity analysis that used a broader cancer definition found implementation was associated with a 7.2% (95% CI, -13.5% to -0.48%; P = .04) level decrease in the percentage of TIRF prescriptions for patients without cancer. Lastly, the TIRF-REMS was associated with a 22.5% level decline in the percentage of TIRF prescriptions for patients without known opioid tolerance (95% CI, -36.1% to -5.95%; P = .01) followed by 1.98% monthly decreases (95% CI, -3.19% to -0.80%; P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Implementation of the TIRF-REMS Access Program, a restrictive drug distribution program, was associated with a temporary reduction in the rate of TIRF prescribing to Medicare Part D beneficiaries, and with a sustained decrease in the percentage of TIRF prescriptions for patients without known opioid tolerance. Implementation may have also been associated with a temporary decrease in the percentage of TIRF prescriptions for patients without cancer.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fde/6450314/ea0c1ccb94ef/jamanetwopen-2-e191340-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fde/6450314/a2512a4d8f4c/jamanetwopen-2-e191340-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fde/6450314/cf836fc445f5/jamanetwopen-2-e191340-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fde/6450314/823a34e20671/jamanetwopen-2-e191340-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fde/6450314/ea0c1ccb94ef/jamanetwopen-2-e191340-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fde/6450314/a2512a4d8f4c/jamanetwopen-2-e191340-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fde/6450314/cf836fc445f5/jamanetwopen-2-e191340-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fde/6450314/823a34e20671/jamanetwopen-2-e191340-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fde/6450314/ea0c1ccb94ef/jamanetwopen-2-e191340-g004.jpg
摘要

重要性

经粘膜快速释放芬太尼(TIRF)药物是一种强效、快速作用的阿片类药物,用于治疗对其他全天阿片类镇痛药耐受的癌症患者的突破性疼痛。2012 年 3 月,美国食品和药物管理局批准了一项风险评估和缓解策略(REMS),要求开处方者、分销商、药店和患者参加 REMS,以开具、分发或接收 TIRF 药物。

目的

评估 TIRF-REMS 准入计划与 TIRF 处方之间的关联。

设计、地点和参与者:使用全国医疗保险 D 部分受益人的 TIRF 处方的中断时间序列分析,从 2010 年到 2014 年。数据于 2017 年 8 月至 2018 年 7 月进行分析。

主要结果和措施

每 100000 名医疗保险 D 部分受益人的 TIRF 处方率,总体和按癌症状况分层;无癌症患者 TIRF 处方的百分比,总体和按品牌分层;以及无已知阿片类药物耐受性患者 TIRF 处方的百分比,定义为每天至少开 60 毫克吗啡当量的患者,总体和按品牌分层。

结果

有 8619 名临床医生为 10472 名患者开出了 99601 份 TIRF 处方。大多数患者(79%)年龄小于 65 岁(平均[标准差]年龄,56[13]岁),大多数(67%)没有癌症。TIRF-REMS 的实施与 TIRF 处方的相对水平下降 26.7%(95%CI,-33.3%至-19.4%;P<.001)相关,但随后每月处方增加 2.0%(95%CI,1.3%至 2.7%;P<.001)。考虑到整体阿片类药物处方趋势的敏感性分析与这些发现一致。此外,REMS 实施与无癌症患者处方比例的水平(0.47%;95%CI,-5.36%至 4.69%;P=.85)或趋势(0.16%;95%CI,-0.06%至 0.37%;P=.15)均无显著变化。然而,一项使用更广泛癌症定义的敏感性分析发现,实施与无癌症患者 TIRF 处方比例的 7.2%(95%CI,-13.5%至-0.48%;P=.04)水平下降相关。最后,TIRF-REMS 与无已知阿片类药物耐受性患者 TIRF 处方比例的 22.5%水平下降相关(95%CI,-36.1%至-5.95%;P=.01),随后每月下降 1.98%(95%CI,-3.19%至-0.80%;P=.001)。

结论和相关性

TIRF-REMS 准入计划的实施,即一项限制性药物分发计划,与医疗保险 D 部分受益人的 TIRF 处方率的暂时下降以及无已知阿片类药物耐受性患者的 TIRF 处方比例的持续下降相关。实施可能还与无癌症患者 TIRF 处方比例的暂时下降有关。

相似文献

1
Association of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Program With Transmucosal Fentanyl Prescribing.风险评估和缓解策略计划与经黏膜芬太尼处方的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e191340. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1340.
2
Assessment of the FDA Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy for Transmucosal Immediate-Release Fentanyl Products.评估 FDA 对经粘膜快速释放型芬太尼产品的风险评估和缓解策略。
JAMA. 2019 Feb 19;321(7):676-685. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0235.
3
Assessment of Postoperative Opioid Prescriptions Before and After Implementation of a Mandatory Prescription Drug Monitoring Program.评估实施强制性处方药物监测计划前后的术后阿片类药物处方。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Oct 1;2(10):e212924. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.2924. eCollection 2021 Oct.
4
Controlled Substance Prescribing Patterns--Prescription Behavior Surveillance System, Eight States, 2013.受控物质处方模式 - 处方行为监测系统,八个州,2013 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Oct 16;64(9):1-14. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6409a1.
5
Trends and Patterns of Geographic Variation in Opioid Prescribing Practices by State, United States, 2006-2017.2006-2017 年美国各州阿片类药物处方实践的地域差异趋势和模式。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190665. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0665.
6
Primary care physician opinion survey on FDA opioid risk evaluation and mitigation strategies.关于美国食品药品监督管理局阿片类药物风险评估与缓解策略的基层医疗医生意见调查
J Opioid Manag. 2011 Mar-Apr;7(2):109-15. doi: 10.5055/jom.2011.0053.
7
Assessing the impact of the extended-release/long-acting opioid an-algesics risk evaluation and mitigation strategies on opioid prescrip-tion volume.评估缓释/长效阿片类镇痛药风险评估与缓解策略对阿片类药物处方量的影响。
J Opioid Manag. 2017 May/Jun;13(3):157-168. doi: 10.5055/jom.2017.0383.
8
Shared risk evaluation mitigation strategy for all immediate-release transmucosal fentanyl dosage forms.所有速释经粘膜芬太尼剂型的共同风险评估缓解策略。
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2012 Jun;26(2):123-6. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2012.677946.
9
Evaluation of the Extended-Release/Long-Acting Opioid Prescribing Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Program by the US Food and Drug Administration: A Review.美国食品和药物管理局对延长释放/长效阿片类药物处方风险评估和缓解策略计划的评估:综述。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Feb 1;180(2):301-309. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.5459.
10
The Prevalence of Off-label Prescribing of Transmucosal Immediate-Release Fentanyl in France.法国透皮速释型芬太尼的标签外使用情况。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Jun;63(6):980-987. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.02.016. Epub 2022 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Appropriateness of Prescribing Transmucosal Immediate-Release Fentanyl in the Emergency Room, During Hospitalization, and at Discharge: A Retrospective Study.急诊室、住院期间及出院时开具经黏膜速释芬太尼处方的适宜性:一项回顾性研究
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Nov 28;17(12):1609. doi: 10.3390/ph17121609.
2
Physician experiences with and perceptions of risk evaluation and mitigation strategy programs with elements to assure safe use.医生对包含确保安全使用要素的风险评估和缓解策略计划的经验和看法。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 6;18(7):e0288008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288008. eCollection 2023.
3
Immediate release fentanyl in general practices: Mostly off-label prescribing.

本文引用的文献

1
Deaths: Final Data for 2016.死亡:2016年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2018 Jul;67(5):1-76.
2
Opioid Prescription, Morbidity, and Mortality in United States Dialysis Patients.美国透析患者的阿片类药物处方、发病率和死亡率
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Dec;28(12):3658-3670. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2017010098. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
3
Vital Signs: Changes in Opioid Prescribing in the United States, 2006-2015.生命体征:2006 - 2015年美国阿片类药物处方的变化
一般医疗实践中即释型芬太尼的使用:主要为标签外处方。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2023 Dec;29(1):2165644. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2023.2165644.
4
Self-Reported Practices and Emotions in Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study of German Physicians.慢性非癌性疼痛开具阿片类药物的自我报告行为与情绪:德国医生的横断面研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 29;11(9):2506. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092506.
5
Patient and Caregiver Experiences With and Perceptions of Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Programs With Elements to Assure Safe Use.患者和照护者对具有确保安全使用要素的风险评估和缓解策略计划的体验和看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2144386. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44386.
6
The rising crisis of illicit fentanyl use, overdose, and potential therapeutic strategies.非法芬太尼使用、过量用药的不断加剧的危机,以及潜在的治疗策略。
Transl Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 11;9(1):282. doi: 10.1038/s41398-019-0625-0.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Jul 7;66(26):697-704. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6626a4.
4
The Effect of Opioid Prescribing Guidelines on Prescriptions by Emergency Physicians in Ohio.阿片类药物处方指南对俄亥俄州急诊医师处方的影响。
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;70(6):799-808.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.03.057. Epub 2017 May 23.
5
Evaluating the Impact of Florida's "Stand Your Ground" Self-defense Law on Homicide and Suicide by Firearm: An Interrupted Time Series Study.评估佛罗里达州“坚守阵地”自卫法对枪支凶杀和自杀的影响:一项中断时间序列研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jan 1;177(1):44-50. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6811.
6
Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial.中断时间序列回归在公共卫生干预措施评价中的应用:教程。
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Feb 1;46(1):348-355. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw098.
7
The prescription opioid and heroin crisis: a public health approach to an epidemic of addiction.处方阿片类药物和海洛因危机:一种公共卫生方法应对成瘾的流行。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:559-74. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122957. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
8
Prescription opioid use among disabled Medicare beneficiaries: intensity, trends, and regional variation.残疾医疗保险受益人中处方阿片类药物的使用情况:强度、趋势及地区差异。
Med Care. 2014 Sep;52(9):852-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000183.
9
Risk adjustment of Medicare capitation payments using the CMS-HCC model.使用CMS-HCC模型对医疗保险按人头付费进行风险调整。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2004 Summer;25(4):119-41.
10
Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medication use research.药物使用研究中中断时间序列研究的分段回归分析。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2002 Aug;27(4):299-309. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2710.2002.00430.x.