Suppr超能文献

尼日利亚北部农村社区中妇女对群体产前护理的体验。

Women's experience with group prenatal care in a rural community in northern Nigeria.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.

College of Health Science, Bingham University, Jos, Nigeria.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 May;145(2):164-169. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12788. Epub 2019 Mar 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess women's experience of group prenatal care in a rural Nigerian community.

METHODS

In an observational study, consenting pregnant women were enrolled in a group prenatal care program based on the CenteringPregnancy model from July 1, 2010, to June 30, 2011, in Tsibiri, Nigeria. Women were interviewed before joining the group and postnatally. A predesigned pro forma was used to assess group behavior during sessions. Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied to data.

RESULTS

In total, 161 women enrolled, and 54 of 72 scheduled prenatal sessions took place. The average number of visits was three per woman, with good group interaction and cohesion. Mothers who could mention at least five out of eight danger signs of pregnancy increased from 1.4% (2) to 13.3% (14) (P<0.001, 95% CI 4.28-19.52), while mean knowledge score for danger signs increased from 31% to 47.8% (P<0.001, 95% CI 0.86-2.16). Commitment to birth preparedness plans was impressive. The mothers enjoyed the group sessions and shared the lessons they learned with others.

CONCLUSION

Group prenatal care was feasible and acceptable to women in the present study setting. Comparative trials would be helpful to demonstrate the benefits of the tested model in low-income settings.

摘要

目的

评估尼日利亚农村社区中妇女对群体产前护理的体验。

方法

在一项观察性研究中,2010 年 7 月 1 日至 2011 年 6 月 30 日,同意参与的孕妇在尼日利亚 Tsibiri 参加基于 CenteringPregnancy 模式的群体产前护理计划。在加入小组前和产后对妇女进行访谈。使用预先设计的表格评估小组在会议期间的行为。对数据进行描述性和推断性统计分析。

结果

共有 161 名妇女入组,72 次产前预约中有 54 次进行。每位妇女的平均就诊次数为三次,群体互动和凝聚力良好。能够至少提到怀孕八大危险信号中的五个的母亲从 1.4%(2)增加到 13.3%(14)(P<0.001,95%CI 4.28-19.52),而危险信号的平均知识评分从 31%增加到 47.8%(P<0.001,95%CI 0.86-2.16)。对生育准备计划的承诺令人印象深刻。母亲们喜欢小组会议,并与他人分享他们所学到的课程。

结论

在本研究环境中,群体产前护理对妇女是可行且可接受的。比较试验将有助于证明在低收入环境中测试模型的益处。

相似文献

1
Women's experience with group prenatal care in a rural community in northern Nigeria.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 May;145(2):164-169. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12788. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
4
Birth preparedness and complication readiness among pregnant women admitted in a rural hospital in Rwanda.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 May 30;18(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1818-x.
5
Birth preparedness and complication readiness among prenatal attendees in a teaching hospital in South West Nigeria.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Nov;139(2):202-210. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12271. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
7
Birth preparedness and complication readiness among pregnant women in Osogbo Metropolis, Southwest Nigeria.
Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Jun 1;27:74. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.27.74.7266. eCollection 2017.
10
Male Involvement in Birth Preparedness in Ogun State, Nigeria: A Rural/Urban Comparative Cross-sectional Study.
Afr J Reprod Health. 2020 Jun;24(2):70-84. doi: 10.29063/ajrh2020/v24i2.7.

引用本文的文献

1
Maternal Health Services in Rural South Africa: Challenges and Opportunities for Improvement.
Matern Fetal Med. 2025 Apr;7(2):127-128. doi: 10.1097/FM9.0000000000000286. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
2
Group antenatal care positively transforms the care experience: Results of an effectiveness trial in Malawi.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 18;20(6):e0317171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317171. eCollection 2025.
5
Integrated group antenatal and pediatric care in Haiti: A comprehensive care accompaniment model.
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 12;19(7):e0300908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300908. eCollection 2024.
6
Improving health literacy through group antenatal care: results from a cluster randomized controlled trial in Ghana.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jan 5;24(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06224-x.
7
Contributions of CenteringPregnancy to women's health behaviours, health literacy, and health care use in the Netherlands.
Prev Med Rep. 2023 May 24;35:102244. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102244. eCollection 2023 Oct.
8
The Experience of Pregnant Women in the Health Management Model of Internet-Based Centering Pregnancy: A Qualitative Study.
Int J Womens Health. 2022 Sep 7;14:1281-1289. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S375675. eCollection 2022.
10
Scoping review of maternal and newborn health interventions and programmes in Nigeria.
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 15;12(2):e054784. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054784.

本文引用的文献

3
WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience-going beyond survival.
BJOG. 2017 May;124(6):860-862. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14599. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
4
Promoting improved social support and quality of life with the CenteringPregnancy group model of prenatal care.
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2017 Feb;20(1):209-220. doi: 10.1007/s00737-016-0698-1. Epub 2016 Dec 17.
5
Group Prenatal Care Compared With Traditional Prenatal Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;128(3):551-61. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001560.
8
The Effect of Centering Pregnancy versus Traditional Prenatal Care Models on Improved Adolescent Health Behaviors in the Perinatal Period.
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015 Oct;28(5):395-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2014.12.003. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
9
Group versus conventional antenatal care for women.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 4;2015(2):CD007622. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007622.pub3.
10
Centering pregnancy in Missouri: a system level analysis.
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014 Feb 13;2014:285386. doi: 10.1155/2014/285386. eCollection 2014.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验