• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测 35-37 孕周的小于胎龄儿:母亲因素和 20-36 孕周间生长速度的作用。

Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates at 35-37 weeks' gestation: contribution of maternal factors and growth velocity between 20 and 36 weeks.

机构信息

Fetal Medicine Research Institute, King's College Hospital, London, UK.

Fetal Medicine Unit, Medway Maritime Hospital, Gillingham, UK.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;53(4):488-495. doi: 10.1002/uog.20243.

DOI:10.1002/uog.20243
PMID:30779239
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the performance of ultrasonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) at 35 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation in the prediction of delivery of a small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonate and assess the additive value of, first, maternal risk factors and, second, fetal growth velocity between 20 and 36 weeks' gestation in improving such prediction.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of 44 043 singleton pregnancies undergoing routine ultrasound examination at 19 + 0 to 23 + 6 and at 35 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine whether addition of maternal risk factors and growth velocity, the latter defined as the difference in EFW Z-score or fetal abdominal circumference (AC) Z-score between the third- and second-trimester scans divided by the time interval between the scans, improved the performance of EFW Z-score at 35 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks in the prediction of delivery of a SGA neonate with birth weight < 10 and < 3 percentiles within 2 weeks and at any stage after assessment.

RESULTS

Screening by EFW Z-score at 35 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation predicted 63.4% (95% CI, 62.0-64.7%) of neonates with birth weight < 10 percentile and 74.2% (95% CI, 72.2-76.1%) of neonates with birth weight < 3 percentile born at any stage after assessment, at a screen-positive rate of 10%. The respective values for SGA neonates born within 2 weeks after assessment were 76.8% (95% CI, 74.4-79.0%) and 81.3% (95% CI, 78.2-84.0%). For a desired 90% detection rate of SGA neonate delivered at any stage after assessment, the necessary screen-positive rate would be 33.7% for SGA < 10 percentile and 24.4% for SGA < 3 percentile. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that, in the prediction of a SGA neonate with birth weight < 10 and < 3 percentiles, there was a significant contribution from EFW Z-score at 35 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation, maternal risk factors and AC growth velocity, but not EFW growth velocity. However, the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve for prediction of delivery of a SGA neonate by screening with maternal risk factors and EFW Z-score was not improved by addition of AC growth velocity.

CONCLUSION

Screening for SGA neonates by EFW at 35 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation and use of the 10 percentile as the cut-off predicts 63% of affected neonates. Prediction of 90% of SGA neonates necessitates classification of about 35% of the population as being screen positive. The predictive performance of EFW is not improved by addition of estimated growth velocity between the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

摘要

目的

评估 35 周+0 至 36 周+6 周妊娠时超声估计胎儿体重(EFW)在预测小于胎龄儿(SGA)新生儿中的表现,并评估母亲危险因素以及妊娠 20 周至 36 周之间胎儿生长速度的附加价值,以改善这种预测。

方法

这是一项对 44043 例单胎妊娠的前瞻性研究,这些妊娠在 19 周+0 至 23 周+6 周和 35 周+0 至 36 周+6 周进行常规超声检查。多变量逻辑回归分析用于确定是否添加母亲危险因素和生长速度(后者定义为第三和第二 trimester 扫描之间的 EFW Z-score 或胎儿腹围(AC)Z-score 差异除以扫描之间的时间间隔)可以改善 35 周+0 至 36 周+6 周妊娠时 EFW Z-score 在预测出生体重 <10 和 <3 百分位的 SGA 新生儿在 2 周内和评估后任何阶段分娩中的表现。

结果

35 周+0 至 36 周+6 周妊娠时的 EFW Z-score 筛查预测出生体重 <10 百分位的新生儿的 63.4%(95%CI,62.0-64.7%)和出生体重 <3 百分位的新生儿的 74.2%(95%CI,72.2-76.1%),筛查阳性率为 10%。评估后任何阶段出生的 SGA 新生儿在 2 周内的相应值分别为 76.8%(95%CI,74.4-79.0%)和 81.3%(95%CI,78.2-84.0%)。为了达到在评估后任何阶段出生的 SGA 新生儿 90%的检出率,SGA <10 百分位的必要筛查阳性率为 33.7%,SGA <3 百分位的为 24.4%。多变量逻辑回归分析表明,在预测出生体重 <10 和 <3 百分位的 SGA 新生儿中,EFW Z-score 在 35 周+0 至 36 周+6 周妊娠、母亲危险因素和 AC 生长速度有显著贡献,但 EFW 生长速度没有贡献。然而,使用母亲危险因素和 EFW Z-score 进行筛查预测 SGA 新生儿分娩的受试者工作特征曲线下面积并未因添加 AC 生长速度而得到改善。

结论

35 周+0 至 36 周+6 周妊娠时通过 EFW 筛查 SGA 新生儿,并将 10 百分位作为截止值,可以预测 63%的受影响新生儿。预测 90%的 SGA 新生儿需要将约 35%的人群分类为筛查阳性。EFW 的预测性能不能通过添加妊娠 2 至 3 trimester 之间的估计生长速度来改善。

相似文献

1
Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates at 35-37 weeks' gestation: contribution of maternal factors and growth velocity between 20 and 36 weeks.预测 35-37 孕周的小于胎龄儿:母亲因素和 20-36 孕周间生长速度的作用。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;53(4):488-495. doi: 10.1002/uog.20243.
2
Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates.32 周与 36 周常规超声检查:预测小于胎龄儿。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;53(6):761-768. doi: 10.1002/uog.20258. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
3
Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates at 35-37 weeks' gestation: contribution of maternal factors and growth velocity between 32 and 36 weeks.预测 35-37 孕周的小于胎龄儿:母亲因素的影响和 32-36 孕周间的生长速度。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 May;53(5):630-637. doi: 10.1002/uog.20267. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
4
Prediction of large-for-gestational-age neonate by routine third-trimester ultrasound.通过常规孕晚期超声预测大于胎龄儿。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep;54(3):326-333. doi: 10.1002/uog.20377. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
5
Two-stage approach for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate and adverse perinatal outcome by routine ultrasound examination at 35-37 weeks' gestation.在 35-37 孕周的常规超声检查中预测小于胎龄儿和不良围产结局的两阶段方法。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;54(4):484-491. doi: 10.1002/uog.20391. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
6
Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 35-37 weeks.小于胎龄儿的预测:孕35-37周时通过胎儿生物测量进行筛查。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;45(5):559-65. doi: 10.1002/uog.14816. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
7
Prediction of small for gestational age neonates: screening by maternal factors, fetal biometry, and biomarkers at 35-37 weeks' gestation.预测小于胎龄儿:孕 35-37 周时通过母体因素、胎儿生物测量和生物标志物进行筛查。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 May;220(5):486.e1-486.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.227. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
8
Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 30-34 weeks.小于胎龄儿的预测:孕30 - 34周时通过胎儿生物测量进行筛查。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;45(5):551-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.14771. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
9
Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate by third-trimester fetal biometry and impact of ultrasound-delivery interval.孕晚期胎儿生物测量对小于胎龄儿的预测及超声检查与分娩间隔的影响
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;49(3):372-378. doi: 10.1002/uog.15959.
10
Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by biophysical and biochemical markers at 30-34 weeks.小于胎龄儿的预测:孕30 - 34周时通过生物物理和生化标志物进行筛查。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;46(4):446-51. doi: 10.1002/uog.14863. Epub 2015 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Preventing Stillbirth: A Review of Screening and Prevention Strategies.预防死产:筛查与预防策略综述
Matern Fetal Med. 2022 Jul 22;4(3):218-228. doi: 10.1097/FM9.0000000000000160. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
The value of fetal growth trajectory during pregnancy in predicting small for gestational age neonates at term.孕期胎儿生长轨迹在预测足月小样儿方面的价值。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Apr 10;25(1):423. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07518-y.
3
Cesarean Section and Its Impact on Uterine Artery Resistance and the Risk of Pre-eclampsia in Subsequent Pregnancies.
剖宫产及其对子宫动脉阻力和后续妊娠中先兆子痫风险的影响。
J Reprod Infertil. 2024 Jul-Sep;25(3):211-218. doi: 10.18502/jri.v25i3.17015.
4
Prenatal Diagnosis of Isolated Single Umbilical Artery: Incidence, Risk Factors and Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes.孤立性单脐动脉的产前诊断:发生率、危险因素及对妊娠结局的影响。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jun 3;59(6):1080. doi: 10.3390/medicina59061080.
5
Intrauterine Growth Restriction-Prediction and Peripartum Data on Hospital Care.胎儿宫内生长受限-预测及围产期医院护理数据。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Apr 16;59(4):773. doi: 10.3390/medicina59040773.
6
Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates at 33-39 weeks' gestation in China: logistic regression modeling of the contributions of second- and third-trimester ultrasound data and maternal factors.中国 33-39 孕周小胎龄儿的预测:二、三孕期超声数据和母体因素的逻辑回归模型贡献。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Aug 25;22(1):661. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04991-7.
7
Personalized Model to Predict Small for Gestational Age at Delivery Using Fetal Biometrics, Maternal Characteristics, and Pregnancy Biomarkers: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Births Assisted at a Spanish Hospital.使用胎儿生物特征、母亲特征和妊娠生物标志物预测分娩时小于胎龄儿的个性化模型:一项对西班牙一家医院辅助分娩的回顾性队列研究。
J Pers Med. 2022 May 8;12(5):762. doi: 10.3390/jpm12050762.
8
Use of a Feed-Forward Back Propagation Network for the Prediction of Small for Gestational Age Newborns in a Cohort of Pregnant Patients with Thrombophilia.使用前馈反向传播网络预测患有血栓形成倾向的孕妇队列中的小于胎龄新生儿。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 16;12(4):1009. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12041009.
9
Estimation of multiple ordered ROC curves using placement values.使用定位值估计多个有序 ROC 曲线。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2022 Aug;31(8):1470-1483. doi: 10.1177/09622802221094940. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
10
Detection and clinical outcome of small-for-gestational-age fetuses in the third trimester-A comparison between routine ultrasound examination and examination on indication.妊娠晚期小胎龄儿的检出与临床结局——常规超声检查与指征性检查的比较。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Jan;101(1):102-110. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14278. Epub 2021 Nov 2.