Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Jul;98(7):830-841. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13585. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
Cesarean section rates are increasing with a decrease in the rate of trial of labor after cesarean section. The objective of this study was to systematically review the predictive characteristics of sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness for uterine rupture during labor.
The review was carried out in agreement with PRISMA and SEDATE guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Library were searched from 1990 until November 2018. Quality of included studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Data were extracted to construct 2 × 2 tables from each study comparing ultrasound measurement with uterine defect at time of delivery. The data were plotted as a summary receiver-operating characteristic (SROC) curve using the hierarchical SROC model.
Twenty-eight observational cohort studies met the selection criteria for inclusion. Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness was measured at a gestational age of 36-40 weeks in women with a previous cesarean section. The risk of bias and concerns regarding applicability were low among most studies. The sonographic measurement was correlated with either delivery outcome or lower uterine segment thickness at the time of repeat cesarean section. The cut-off value for lower uterine segment thickness ranged from 1.5 to 4.05 mm across all studies. An association between thin lower uterine segment measurement and uterine dehiscence and uterine rupture was shown in 27 and four studies, respectively. Nineteen studies were included in a meta-analysis with a subgroup analysis by ultrasound methodology. In the subgroup using the ultrasound methodology associated with uterine rupture, the cut-off value is more precise (2.0-3.65 mm) among these 12 studies. There were 18 cases (1.0%) of uterine rupture, 120 (6.6%) of uterine dehiscence and 1674 (92.4%) women with no uterine defect. The SROC curve showed a sensitivity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.92) and specificity of 0.77 (95% CI 0.70-0.83). The negative likelihood ratio was 0.11 (95% CI 0.08-0.16) and the diagnostic odds ratio was 34.0 (95% CI 18.2-63.5).
Lower uterine segment thickness >3.65 mm, measured using a standardized ultrasound technique, is associated with a lower likelihood of uterine rupture.
剖宫产率随着剖宫产术后试产率的降低而升高。本研究的目的是系统回顾超声测量子宫下段厚度对分娩时子宫破裂的预测特征。
本综述符合 PRISMA 和 SEDATE 指南。从 1990 年到 2018 年 11 月,检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 Cochrane Library。使用 QUADAS-2 工具评估纳入研究的质量。从每个研究中提取比较超声测量与分娩时子宫缺陷的 2×2 表。使用层次 SROC 模型将数据绘制为综合接收者操作特征 (SROC) 曲线。
28 项观察性队列研究符合纳入标准。在有剖宫产史的妇女中,在 36-40 孕周进行超声下子宫下段厚度测量。大多数研究的偏倚风险和适用性问题较低。超声测量与分娩结局或再次剖宫产时子宫下段厚度相关。所有研究的子宫下段厚度截断值范围为 1.5-4.05mm。27 项研究显示,薄的子宫下段测量与子宫切开和子宫破裂有关,4 项研究显示与子宫破裂有关。19 项研究纳入了一项荟萃分析,并按超声方法进行了亚组分析。在使用与子宫破裂相关的超声方法的亚组中,12 项研究中该截断值更精确(2.0-3.65mm)。有 18 例(1.0%)子宫破裂,120 例(6.6%)子宫切开,1674 例(92.4%)无子宫缺陷。SROC 曲线显示敏感性为 0.88(95%CI 0.83-0.92),特异性为 0.77(95%CI 0.70-0.83)。阴性似然比为 0.11(95%CI 0.08-0.16),诊断比值比为 34.0(95%CI 18.2-63.5)。
使用标准化超声技术测量的子宫下段厚度>3.65mm 与子宫破裂的可能性较低相关。