Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Farmasi Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia.
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 19;14(2):e0212328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212328. eCollection 2019.
This study aimed to define the problems of the current use of the e-Catalogue and the national formulary (NF)-two elements of medicine pricing and reimbursement policies in Indonesia for achieving universal health coverage (UHC)-by examining the knowledge and attitudes of stakeholders. Specifically, to investigate (1) the perceived challenges involved in the further implementation of the e-Catalogue and the NF, (2) reasons of prescribing medicines not listed in the NF, and (3) possible improvements in the acceptance and use of the e-Catalogue and the NF.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with stakeholders (policymakers, healthcare providers, a pharmaceutical industry representative, and experienced patients) to collect the qualitative data. The data was analysed using directed content analysis, following the guidelines of the COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative studies (COREQ) in reporting the findings.
Interestingly, 20 of 45 participants decided to withdraw from the interview due to their lack of knowledge of the e-Catalogue and the NF. All 25 stakeholders who fully participated in this research were in favor of the e-Catalogue and the NF. However, interviewees identified a range of challenges. A major challenge was the lack of harmonization between the lists of medicines in the e-Catalogue and the NF. Several system and personal reasons for prescribing medicines not listed in the NF were identified. Important reasons were a lack of incentives for physicians as well as a lack of transparent and evidence-based methods of selection for the medicines to be listed in the NF.
The e-Catalogue and the NF have not been fully utilized for achieving UHC in Indonesia. Some possible improvements suggested were harmonization of medicines listed in the e-Catalogue and the NF, restructuring incentive programs for prescribing NF medicines, and increasing the transparency and evidence-based approach for selection of medicines listed in the e-Catalogue and the NF.
本研究旨在通过调查利益相关者的知识和态度,确定当前在印度尼西亚实现全民健康覆盖(UHC)的药品定价和报销政策中电子目录和国家处方集(NF)这两个要素所存在的问题。具体而言,本研究旨在调查:(1)进一步实施电子目录和 NF 所面临的挑战;(2)开处方时不使用 NF 中列出的药品的原因;(3)提高电子目录和 NF 的可接受性和使用率的可能改进措施。
采用半结构式访谈的方法,对利益相关者(决策者、医疗服务提供者、制药行业代表和有经验的患者)进行访谈,收集定性数据。按照报告定性研究的 COREQ(统一报告准则)的指导方针,对数据进行了定向内容分析,以报告研究结果。
有趣的是,由于缺乏对电子目录和 NF 的了解,45 名参与者中有 20 名决定退出访谈。所有 25 名充分参与这项研究的利益相关者都赞成电子目录和 NF。然而,受访者确定了一系列挑战。一个主要挑战是电子目录和 NF 中药品清单之间缺乏协调。确定了一些开处方时不使用 NF 中列出的药品的系统和个人原因。重要的原因是缺乏对医生的激励,以及 NF 中列出的药品选择缺乏透明和基于证据的方法。
电子目录和 NF 尚未在印度尼西亚充分用于实现 UHC。提出的一些可能的改进措施包括协调电子目录和 NF 中列出的药品、调整 NF 药品处方激励计划、以及提高电子目录和 NF 中列出的药品选择的透明度和基于证据的方法。