Department of Pharmacy Practice and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 7;11:1163342. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1163342. eCollection 2023.
Examining how and why a country prioritizes and implements pharmaceutical reforms tends to show complex processes and myriad efforts made toward improving access to medicines. This study examines factors that enabled the prioritization and implementation of selected pharmaceutical reform items and how these factors contributed to improving equitable access to medicines and universal health coverage in Ghana.
An analytical framework was developed to identify variables to explore in answering the study questions and frame the analysis and presentation of findings. Documents analyzed included the National Medicines Policies, Health Sector Program of Work, and other health policies. Quantitative data were sourced from databases maintained by World Health Organization and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation.
The three main factors, evidence, financial and technical support, and alignment to national and global policies, influenced the prioritization and implementation of access to medicines reforms. The reforms targeted rational selection and use of medicines, medicine pricing, sustainable medicine financing, and regulatory and supply chain systems. Although there were limited quantitative data to quantify access to medicine policies" impact on universal health coverage, it can be reasonably assumed that, in Ghana, access to medicine policies has contributed to financial protection and improved access to quality health services.
Access to medicine policies targeted at promoting rational medicine selection and use, regulating medicine pricing and improving sustainable financing for medicines as well as the regulatory and supply chain systems arguably contributed to the attainment of UHC and must be sustained. Therefore, data collection and reporting indicators for access to medicines must be prioritized.
研究一个国家如何以及为何优先考虑并实施药品改革,往往可以揭示出改善药品可及性的复杂过程和多方努力。本研究考察了使选定药品改革项目得以优先考虑和实施的因素,以及这些因素如何有助于改善加纳公平获得药品和全民健康覆盖的情况。
制定了一个分析框架,以确定变量,用于回答研究问题并构建分析和呈现研究结果的框架。分析的文件包括国家药品政策、卫生部门工作计划和其他卫生政策。定量数据来源于世界卫生组织和健康指标与评估研究所维护的数据库。
三个主要因素,即证据、财务和技术支持以及与国家和全球政策的一致性,影响了药品可及性改革的优先排序和实施。这些改革针对合理选择和使用药品、药品定价、可持续的药品融资以及监管和供应链系统。尽管量化药品政策对全民健康覆盖影响的定量数据有限,但可以合理地假设,在加纳,药品政策有助于实现财务保护和改善获得高质量卫生服务的机会。
旨在促进合理选择和使用药品、规范药品定价和改善药品可持续融资以及监管和供应链系统的药品可及性政策,有助于实现全民健康覆盖,必须予以维持。因此,必须优先考虑药品可及性的数据收集和报告指标。