Departamento de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación, Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.
Departamento de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación, Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Jun;182:1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
Many explanations accounting for rapid automatized naming's (RAN) relationship with reading have been proposed. One of the most debated perspectives argues that RAN measures orthographic processing, defined as the ability to process groups of letters or entire words as single units. Given that reading familiar spelling patterns will rely on orthographic processing more than reading unfamiliar spelling patterns, manipulating orthographic syllable frequency can be a useful tool to examine RAN's relationship with orthographic familiarity. To meet this aim, RAN's concurrent and longitudinal contribution to reading speed of nonwords composed of high and low syllable frequency, as well as real words, was assessed in a sample of 142 Spanish children. RAN, phonological skills, and visual skills were measured in kindergarten and Grade 5, whereas reading speed was measured in Grade 5 only. Both longitudinal and concurrent path analyses revealed that RAN made a comparable contribution to the reading of both types of nonwords as well as to real-word reading. This suggests that the reading-related cognitive ability measured by RAN operates at a grapho-phonemic, grapho-syllabic, and whole-word level. The current results do not support the view of RAN as a measure of orthographic processing.
已经提出了许多解释来解释快速自动命名(RAN)与阅读之间的关系。其中最有争议的观点之一认为,RAN 衡量的是正字法加工能力,即把字母或整个单词作为单个单位进行处理的能力。由于阅读熟悉的拼写模式比阅读不熟悉的拼写模式更依赖于正字法加工,因此操纵正字法音节频率可以成为检验 RAN 与正字法熟悉度关系的有用工具。为了达到这一目的,在 142 名西班牙儿童的样本中,评估了 RAN 对高频和低频音节组成的非词以及真实单词的阅读速度的同时和纵向贡献。在幼儿园和五年级测量 RAN、语音技能和视觉技能,而仅在五年级测量阅读速度。纵向和同期路径分析都表明,RAN 对两种非词以及真实单词的阅读都有类似的贡献。这表明 RAN 所测量的与阅读相关的认知能力在图形-语音、图形-音节和全字水平上都起作用。目前的结果并不支持 RAN 是正字法加工衡量标准的观点。