Badian N A
Hobrook Public Schools, Massachusetts, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 1998 Sep-Oct;31(5):472-81. doi: 10.1177/002221949803100505.
Two cohorts of children were followed to determine whether tests of phonological awareness (Syllable Tapping), orthographic processing (Visual Matching), and serial naming speed (RAN Objects), added to a preschool battery, would improve prediction of reading. The major predictors of first-grade reading and spelling were preschool letter naming and sentence memory for both cohorts, but the orthographic and serial naming tasks added a small amount of additional variance. Sentence memory accounted for the most variance in second-grade reading for both cohorts, and Visual Matching made contributions to reading and spelling for each cohort. Sentence memory, Visual Matching, and color naming together yielded an 87% to 90% hit rate in predicting which individual children would be good or poor readers. The orthographic and serial naming speed tasks are useful additions to a preschool predictive battery, but recommendations are that alternative preschool phonological tasks, not based on syllable recognition, should be used to predict reading.
对两组儿童进行跟踪研究,以确定将语音意识测试(音节敲击)、正字法加工测试(视觉匹配)和序列命名速度测试(快速说出物体名称)添加到学前测试组合中,是否能提高对阅读能力的预测。对于这两组儿童,一年级阅读和拼写的主要预测指标是学前字母命名和句子记忆,但正字法和序列命名任务增加了少量额外的方差解释量。句子记忆在两组儿童二年级阅读中解释的方差量最大,视觉匹配对每组儿童的阅读和拼写都有贡献。句子记忆、视觉匹配和颜色命名共同预测哪些儿童阅读能力强或弱时,命中率为87%至90%。正字法和序列命名速度任务是学前预测测试组合中有用的补充,但建议使用不基于音节识别的替代性学前语音任务来预测阅读能力。