Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Brendstrupgårdsvej 100, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Apr;27(4):593-600. doi: 10.1007/s10554-010-9695-z. Epub 2010 Sep 5.
Non-invasive coronary CT angiography (CCTA) has the potential to characterize the composition of non-calcified coronary plaques. CT-density values characterized by Hounsfield Units (HU) may classify non-calcified plaques as fibrous or lipid-rich, but the luminal density caused by the applied contrast material influences HU in the plaques in vitro. The influence of luminal density on HU in non-calcified plaques in vivo is unknown. Hence the purpose of this study was to test whether plaque characterization by CCTA in vivo depends on luminal density. Two CCTA-scans using two different contrast protocols were obtained from 14 male patients with coronary artery disease. The two contrast protocols applied resulted in high and low luminal density. Eleven non- calcified and 13 calcified plaques were identified and confirmed by intravascular ultrasound. Luminal attenuation differed with the two contrast protocols; 326[284;367] vs. 118[103;134] HU (P < 0.00001). In non-calcified plaques mean HU-values was lower 48[28;69] vs. 11[-4;25] HU (P = 0.004) with the low density protocol. As a consequence three out of eleven non-calcified plaques (27%) were reclassified from fibrous (high) to lipid rich (low). For calcified plaques a less pronounced but still significant difference in HU-values was found with the low luminal density. 770[622;919] vs. 675[496;855] HU (P = 0.02).
Non-calcified plaques can be identified and classified by CCTA. However, the luminal density affects the absolute HU of both non-calcified and calcified plaques. Characterization and classification of non-calcified plaques by absolute CT values therefore requires standardization of contrast protocols.
本研究旨在探讨活体 CCTA 斑块特征是否依赖管腔密度。
14 例男性冠心病患者进行了两次 CCTA 扫描,采用两种不同的对比方案。两种对比方案的应用导致管腔密度高低不同。采用血管内超声识别并确认 11 个非钙化斑块和 13 个钙化斑块。
两种对比方案的管腔衰减差异显著;326[284;367]HU 比 118[103;134]HU(P < 0.00001)。在非钙化斑块中,低密度方案的平均 HU 值较低,为 48[28;69]HU 比 11[-4;25]HU(P = 0.004)。因此,11 个非钙化斑块中有 3 个(27%)从纤维性(高)重新分类为富含脂质(低)。对于钙化斑块,HU 值也存在差异,但程度较轻,低管腔密度组为 770[622;919]HU,高管腔密度组为 675[496;855]HU(P = 0.02)。
CCTA 可识别和分类非钙化斑块。然而,管腔密度会影响非钙化和钙化斑块的绝对 HU 值。因此,基于绝对 CT 值对非钙化斑块进行特征描述和分类需要标准化对比方案。