Suppr超能文献

药物干预预防和治疗重症监护患者谵妄的系统评价综述和荟萃分析。

Pharmacological interventions for prevention and management of delirium in intensive care patients: a systematic overview of reviews and meta-analyses.

机构信息

Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Centre for Research in Intensive Care, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 19;9(2):e024562. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024562.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the evidence from reviews and meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials on the effects of pharmacological prevention and management of delirium in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

METHODS

We searched for reviews in July 2017 in: Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index, BIOSIS Previews, CINAHL and LILACS. We assessed whether reviews were systematic according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and assessed the methodological quality using ROBIS.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcomes: all-cause mortality, serious adverse events, prevention of delirium and management of delirium.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

quality of life; non-serious adverse events and cognitive function.

RESULTS

We included 378 reviews: 369 narrative reviews, eight semisystematic reviews which failed on a maximum of two arbitrary PRISMA criteria and one systematic review fulfilling all 27 PRISMA criteria. For the prevention of delirium, we identified the one systematic review and eight semisystematic reviews all assessing the effects of alpha-2-agonists. None found evidence of a reduction of mortality (systematic review RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.24). The systematic review and three semisystematic reviews found no evidence of an effect for the prevention of delirium (systematic review RR 0.85, 0.63 to 1.14). Conversely, four semisystematic reviews found a beneficial effect. Serious adverse events, quality of life, non-serious adverse events and cognitive function were not assessed. We did not identify any systematic or semisystematic reviews addressing other pharmacological interventions for the prevention of delirium. For the management of manifest delirium, we did not identify any systematic or semisystematic review assessing any pharmacological agents.

CONCLUSION

Based on systematic reviews, the evidence for the use of pharmacological interventions for prevention or management of delirium is poor or sparse. A systematic review with low risk of bias assessing the effects of pharmacological prevention of delirium and management of manifest delirium in ICU patients is urgently needed.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42016046628.

摘要

目的

我们评估了随机临床试验的综述和荟萃分析中关于 ICU 患者药物预防和治疗谵妄的效果的证据。

方法

我们于 2017 年 7 月在 Cochrane 图书馆、MEDLINE、Embase、科学引文索引、BIOSIS 预览、CINAHL 和 LILACS 中搜索综述。我们根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)评估综述是否为系统综述,并使用 ROBIS 评估方法学质量。

主要结局

全因死亡率、严重不良事件、谵妄预防和谵妄治疗。

次要结局

生活质量;非严重不良事件和认知功能。

结果

我们纳入了 378 篇综述:369 篇叙述性综述,8 篇半系统性综述,这 8 篇综述最多有 2 项任意的 PRISMA 标准不满足,而 1 篇系统性综述满足所有 27 项 PRISMA 标准。对于预防谵妄,我们确定了 1 篇系统性综述和 8 篇半系统性综述,均评估了α-2-激动剂的效果。没有证据表明死亡率降低(系统性综述 RR 0.99,95%CI 0.79 至 1.24)。系统性综述和 3 篇半系统性综述没有发现预防谵妄的效果(系统性综述 RR 0.85,0.63 至 1.14)。相反,4 篇半系统性综述发现有有益的效果。严重不良事件、生活质量、非严重不良事件和认知功能未被评估。我们没有发现任何针对其他药物干预预防谵妄的系统或半系统性综述。对于明显谵妄的治疗,我们没有发现任何评估任何药物治疗的系统或半系统性综述。

结论

基于系统综述,药物干预预防或治疗谵妄的证据不足或缺乏。急需一项低偏倚风险的系统综述,评估 ICU 患者药物预防谵妄和治疗明显谵妄的效果。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42016046628。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验