Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr University Bochum (IPA), Bochum, Germany.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1153:79-89. doi: 10.1007/5584_2019_342.
Asthmatic patients are suspected of having a higher risk of mold sensitization. Thus, precise diagnosis of fungal sensitization is important. Mold allergen extracts are difficult to standardize, but component-resolved allergy diagnosis may be an alternative to replace extract-based tests. In this research, asthmatic and non-asthmatic subjects were studied for their sensitization to Aspergillus fumigatus (Asp f), Cladosporium herbarum (Cla h), Penicillium chrysogenum (Pen ch), Alternaria alternata (Alt a), and Aspergillus versicolor (Asp v). Extract-based tests were applied using the skin prick test (SPT) and allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE). Subjects with extract-based sensitization to Asp f or Alt a were further investigated for sIgE response to recombinant (r) single mold allergens. At least one mold sensitization was found in about 50% of asthmatic and non-asthmatics with the most frequent sensitization to Alt a, followed by Pen ch, Asp f, Cla h, and Asp v. Interestingly, sensitization rate to individual mold species was always higher in asthmatics and was only significant for Pen ch. The component-resolved diagnosis with the sum of rAsp f 1 - rAsp f 4 plus rAsp f 6 matched the extract-based results (SPT and/or sIgE) in 50% of asthmatics and 46% of non-asthmatics, whereas, rAlt a 1 covered 59% of asthmatics and 50% non-asthmatics of extract-based Alt a sensitization. In conclusion, individual fungal sensitization rate was higher in asthmatics compared to non-asthmatics. Extract-based tests, especially SPTs, were most sensitive, but component-based tests covered 80% of extract-based serological sensitization to Alternaria and Aspergillus.
哮喘患者疑似有更高的霉菌致敏风险。因此,精确诊断霉菌致敏非常重要。霉菌过敏原提取物难以标准化,但成分分辨过敏诊断可能是替代提取物检测的方法。在这项研究中,研究了哮喘和非哮喘患者对烟曲霉(Asp f)、构巢曲霉(Cla h)、产黄青霉(Pen ch)、交链孢霉(Alt a)和杂色曲霉(Asp v)的致敏情况。采用皮肤点刺试验(SPT)和过敏原特异性免疫球蛋白 E(sIgE)进行基于提取物的检测。对基于提取物对 Asp f 或 Alt a 有过敏的患者,进一步研究其对重组(r)单霉菌过敏原的 sIgE 反应。大约 50%的哮喘患者和非哮喘患者存在至少一种霉菌致敏,最常见的致敏原是 Alt a,其次是 Pen ch、Asp f、Cla h 和 Asp v。有趣的是,个体霉菌致敏率在哮喘患者中总是更高,且仅对 Pen ch 有统计学意义。基于成分分辨的诊断,rAsp f 1-rAsp f 4 与 rAsp f 6 的总和与基于提取物的结果(SPT 和/或 sIgE)相匹配,在 50%的哮喘患者和 46%的非哮喘患者中,而 rAlt a 1 涵盖了 59%的哮喘患者和 50%的非哮喘患者的基于提取物的 Alt a 致敏。总之,与非哮喘患者相比,哮喘患者的个体霉菌致敏率更高。基于提取物的检测,尤其是 SPT,最为敏感,但基于成分的检测涵盖了 80%基于提取物的Alternaria 和 Aspergillus 血清学致敏。