Suppr超能文献

结肠镜检查后患者报告的轻微不良事件:系统评价。

Patient-reported minor adverse events after colonoscopy: a systematic review.

机构信息

a The Department of Surgery , Odense University Hospital , Denmark.

b Department of Clinical Science , University of Southern Denmark , Odense , Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Oncol. 2019;58(sup1):S22-S28. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2019.1574979. Epub 2019 Feb 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the incidence and nature of minor adverse events (MAEs) after colonoscopy, and response rates to questionnaires concerning MAEs in patients undergoing colonoscopy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in the databases PubMed and Embase. Predictor variables were patient-reported MAEs after colonoscopy. The outcome was frequency and types of MAEs and the patients' response rate to questionnaires after colonoscopy. Quality assessment for potential risk of bias and level of evidence was evaluated using the National Health and Medical Research Council guidelines.

RESULTS

Seven prospective cohorts were included with a pooled total of 6172 participants. Patients undergoing colonoscopy had a response rate to questionnaires ranging from 64% to 100%, with a mean of 81%. One-third of the patients experienced MAEs, most prominently in the first 1-2 weeks after colonoscopy, and less common at 30 days post colonoscopy. The most frequently reported MAEs were abdominal pain, bloating and abdominal discomfort.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, patients undergoing colonoscopy have a high response rate to questionnaires about MAEs. MAEs after colonoscopy are commonly seen. High age and score of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, female gender and duration of procedure seem to be associated with a higher risk of MAEs, whereas adequate sedation seems to decreases the risk. MAEs after colonoscopy seems to be underreported in the current literature and the existing evidence is based on inhomogeneous reports. In the current study, it was not possible to conduct a meta-analysis. There is a need for larger scale studies addressing the MAEs patients experience in conjunction with a colonoscopy. Furthermore, the assessment of the MAEs should rely on questionnaires tested for validity, comprehensibility and reliability, to reflect the patient-reported experience of a colonoscopy as precise as possible.

摘要

目的

本系统评价的目的是调查结肠镜检查后轻微不良事件(MAE)的发生率和性质,以及接受结肠镜检查患者对 MAE 问卷调查的反应率。

材料和方法

在 PubMed 和 Embase 数据库中进行了系统的文献检索。预测变量为结肠镜检查后患者报告的 MAE。结果是 MAE 的频率和类型,以及患者对结肠镜检查后问卷调查的反应率。使用澳大利亚新西兰国立卫生和医疗研究委员会指南评估潜在偏倚风险和证据水平的质量评估。

结果

共纳入 7 项前瞻性队列研究,总计 6172 名参与者。接受结肠镜检查的患者对问卷的反应率在 64%至 100%之间,平均为 81%。三分之一的患者出现 MAE,最常见于结肠镜检查后 1-2 周,而在 30 天后较少见。报告最多的 MAE 是腹痛、腹胀和腹部不适。

结论

总体而言,接受结肠镜检查的患者对 MAE 问卷调查的反应率较高。结肠镜检查后 MAE 很常见。高年龄和美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分类评分、女性性别和手术持续时间似乎与 MAE 风险增加相关,而适当的镇静似乎降低了风险。结肠镜检查后 MAE 在当前文献中报告不足,现有证据基于不均匀的报告。在本研究中,无法进行荟萃分析。需要更大规模的研究来解决患者在结肠镜检查中经历的 MAE 问题。此外,MAE 的评估应依赖经过有效性、可理解性和可靠性测试的问卷,以尽可能准确地反映患者对结肠镜检查的报告体验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验