van der Pijl Marit S G, Tiel Groenestege Ellen Q, Verhoeven Corine J M
Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Van der Boechorststraat 7, room G-102d, 1081 Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Midwifery. 2019 May;72:60-66. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
In the current Dutch maternity care system, pregnant women who have an indication for an antenatal cardiotocography (CTG) to be undertaken need to be referred from primary midwife-led care to secondary obstetric-led care. Within three different regions in the Netherlands independent primary care midwives perform antenatal CTG in primary care, introduced as a pilot project. The aim of this study was to evaluate the experiences and views of primary care midwives who perform antenatal CTG in primary care.
Using a qualitative approach data were collected by seventeen in depth semi-structured interviews. The interview recordings were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic coding.
Three regions in the Netherlands where midwives carry out antenatal CTG in primary care during this pilot project.
Seventeen primary care midwives were interviewed between July and November 2017.
In general, midwives were satisfied with performing antenatal CTG and felt it contributed positively towards the midwife-client relationship. However, midwives experienced an increased workload, partly due to time-consuming technical difficulties. Furthermore, mixed feelings existed on whether antenatal CTG contributes to a more physiological or to a more pathological approach in midwifery practice. Most midwives believed that performing antenatal CTG contributes to the physiological process: strengthening of their gate-keeper role, increased confidence of their clients and improved midwife-client relationship. In contrast, some midwives believed it contributes to a pathological process: medicalization and relying too much on technical devices.
This study showed an overall positive attitude of primary care midwives towards performing antenatal CTG when required, in primary midwife-led care. However, performing the antenatal CTG can be a challenge for midwives, as midwifery care within this setting is often for healthy women who have a straightforward pregnancy. For some midwives, providing antenatal CTG monitoring in the primary care setting may be seen as using a pathological approach to midwifery care.
There seems to be a place for antenatal CTG in primary midwife-led care. However, further research is needed before this practice can be implemented widely.
在当前荷兰的孕产妇护理体系中,有产前胎心监护(CTG)指征的孕妇需要从初级助产士主导的护理转诊至二级产科主导的护理。在荷兰的三个不同地区,独立的初级护理助产士在初级护理中开展产前CTG,作为一个试点项目引入。本研究的目的是评估在初级护理中进行产前CTG的初级护理助产士的经验和观点。
采用定性方法,通过17次深入的半结构化访谈收集数据。访谈录音逐字转录,并使用主题编码进行分析。
荷兰的三个地区,在此试点项目期间助产士在初级护理中进行产前CTG。
2017年7月至11月期间,对17名初级护理助产士进行了访谈。
总体而言,助产士对进行产前CTG感到满意,并认为这对助产士与客户的关系有积极贡献。然而,助产士经历了工作量的增加,部分原因是耗时的技术难题。此外,对于产前CTG在助产实践中是有助于更生理性还是更病理性的方法存在复杂的感受。大多数助产士认为进行产前CTG有助于生理过程:加强她们的把关人角色、增强客户的信心以及改善助产士与客户的关系。相比之下,一些助产士认为这有助于病理过程:医疗化以及过度依赖技术设备。
本研究表明,在初级助产士主导的护理中,初级护理助产士对在需要时进行产前CTG总体持积极态度。然而,进行产前CTG对助产士来说可能是一项挑战,因为在此环境下的助产护理通常针对妊娠过程顺利的健康女性。对一些助产士来说,在初级护理环境中提供产前CTG监测可能被视为采用病理性的助产护理方法。
产前CTG在初级助产士主导的护理中似乎有一席之地。然而,在这种做法能够广泛实施之前,还需要进一步研究。