• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在感染性休克患者中,液体复苏指南的遵循与结局:重新评估“一刀切”的方法。

Adherence to fluid resuscitation guidelines and outcomes in patients with septic shock: Reassessing the "one-size-fits-all" approach.

机构信息

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2019 Jun;51:94-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.02.006
PMID:30784983
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Management Bundle (SEP-1) recommend rapid crystalloid infusion (≥30 mL/kg) for patients with sepsis-induced hypoperfusion or septic shock. We aimed to assess compliance with this recommendation, factors associated with non-compliance, and how compliance relates to mortality.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational study.

SETTING

1136-bed academic and 235-bed community hospital (January 2015-June 2016).

PATIENTS

Patients with septic shock.

INTERVENTIONS

Crystalloid infusion (≥30 mL/kg) within 6 h of identification of septic shock as required by CMS.

MEASUREMENTS

Associations with compliance and how compliance associates with mortality; odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) reported.

MAIN RESULTS

Overall, 1027 septic shock patients were included. Of these, 486 (47.3%) met the 6-hour 30 ml/kg fluid requirement. Compliance was lower in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) (40.9%), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (42.3%) or chronic liver disease (38.5%) and among those that were identified in the inpatient setting (35.4%) rather than in the emergency department (51.7%). When adjusting for relevant covariates, compliance (compared to non-compliance) was not associated with in-hospital mortality: OR 1.03 CI 0.76-1.41.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings question a "one-size-fits-all" approach to fluid administration and performance measures for patients with sepsis.

摘要

目的

《拯救脓毒症运动》和联邦医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理捆绑包(SEP-1)建议对低灌注或脓毒性休克的脓毒症患者进行快速晶体液输注(≥30ml/kg)。我们旨在评估对该建议的遵守情况、不遵守的相关因素以及遵守情况与死亡率的关系。

设计

回顾性观察性研究。

地点

1136 床的学术医院和 235 床的社区医院(2015 年 1 月至 2016 年 6 月)。

患者

脓毒性休克患者。

干预措施

根据 CMS 的要求,在识别出脓毒性休克后的 6 小时内输注晶体液(≥30ml/kg)。

测量

与合规性的关联以及合规性与死亡率的关联;报告比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。

主要结果

总体而言,纳入了 1027 例脓毒性休克患者。其中,486 例(47.3%)符合 6 小时 30ml/kg 液体需求。心力衰竭(CHF)(40.9%)、慢性肾脏病(CKD)(42.3%)或慢性肝病(38.5%)患者以及在住院环境中识别出的患者(35.4%)的合规性较低,而在急诊室(51.7%)识别出的患者的合规性较低。在校正相关协变量后,与不遵守相比,遵守(与不遵守相比)与住院死亡率无关:OR 1.03,CI 0.76-1.41。

结论

这些发现对脓毒症患者的液体管理和绩效措施提出了一个“一刀切”的方法的质疑。

相似文献

1
Adherence to fluid resuscitation guidelines and outcomes in patients with septic shock: Reassessing the "one-size-fits-all" approach.在感染性休克患者中,液体复苏指南的遵循与结局:重新评估“一刀切”的方法。
J Crit Care. 2019 Jun;51:94-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
2
Mortality rate among patients with septic shock after implementation of 6-hour sepsis protocol in the emergency department of Thammasat University Hospital.泰国国立法政大学医院急诊科实施6小时脓毒症治疗方案后脓毒性休克患者的死亡率
J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Aug;97 Suppl 8:S182-93.
3
Assessing the impact of CKD on outcomes in septic shock patients receiving standard Vs reduced initial fluid volume.评估 CKD 对接受标准与减少初始液体量的脓毒性休克患者结局的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Oct;38(10):2147-2150. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.07.055. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
4
Resuscitation bundle compliance in severe sepsis and septic shock: improves survival, is better late than never.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克中复苏集束化治疗的依从性:可提高生存率,亡羊补牢,为时未晚。
J Intensive Care Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;26(5):304-13. doi: 10.1177/0885066610392499. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
5
Factors influencing compliance with early resuscitation bundle in the management of severe sepsis and septic shock.影响严重脓毒症和感染性休克早期复苏包管理依从性的因素。
Shock. 2012 Nov;38(5):474-9. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31826eea2b.
6
Improvement in process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain.西班牙一项多中心严重脓毒症教育项目实施后护理过程及结局的改善
JAMA. 2008 May 21;299(19):2294-303. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.19.2294.
7
Treatment of Pediatric Septic Shock With the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines and PICU Patient Outcomes.采用脓毒症存活策略指南治疗小儿脓毒性休克及儿科重症监护病房患者的预后
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Oct;17(10):e451-e458. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000906.
8
Establishment of SEP-1 national practice guidelines does not impact fluid administration for septic shock patients.SEP-1 国家实践指南的制定并不影响脓毒性休克患者的液体管理。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Dec;62:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.09.038. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
9
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: association between performance metrics and outcomes in a 7.5-year study.拯救脓毒症运动:一项为期7.5年的研究中绩效指标与结果之间的关联
Crit Care Med. 2015 Jan;43(1):3-12. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000723.
10
Assessment of adherence to the 2020 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for fluid resuscitation in children with suspected septic shock in paediatric emergency departments: a prospective multicentre study.评估儿科急诊科疑似感染性休克儿童液体复苏中2020年拯救脓毒症运动指南的依从性:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Arch Dis Child. 2024 Jul 18;109(8):636-641. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-325837.

引用本文的文献

1
European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) 2025 clinical practice guideline on fluid therapy in adult critically ill patients: part 2-the volume of resuscitation fluids.欧洲重症监护医学学会(ESICM)2025年成人危重症患者液体治疗临床实践指南:第2部分——复苏液体量
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Mar;51(3):461-477. doi: 10.1007/s00134-025-07840-1. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
2
Fluid Resuscitation and Initial Management in Patients Presenting with Sepsis in the General Ward.普通病房脓毒症患者的液体复苏与初始管理
Life (Basel). 2025 Jan 18;15(1):124. doi: 10.3390/life15010124.
3
Optimal fluid resuscitation targets in septic patients with acutely decompensated heart failure.
脓毒症合并急性失代偿性心力衰竭患者的最佳液体复苏目标。
BMC Med. 2024 Oct 24;22(1):492. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03715-2.
4
Effect of a quality improvement program on compliance to the sepsis bundle in non-ICU patients: a multicenter prospective before and after cohort study.质量改进项目对非重症监护病房患者脓毒症集束化治疗依从性的影响:一项多中心前瞻性队列前后对照研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Nov 13;10:1215341. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1215341. eCollection 2023.
5
Association Between Preexisting Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Fluid Administration Among Patients With Sepsis.患有脓毒症的患者中,射血分数降低的心力衰竭与液体管理之间的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2235331. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.35331.
6
Fluid resuscitation of at least 30 mL/kg was not associated with decreased mortality in patients with infection, signs of hypoperfusion, and a do-not-intubate order.对于患有感染、存在灌注不足体征且有不插管医嘱的患者,至少30毫升/千克的液体复苏与死亡率降低无关。
Acute Med Surg. 2022 Sep 30;9(1):e795. doi: 10.1002/ams2.795. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
7
Restrictive fluids versus standard care in adults with sepsis in the emergency department (REFACED): A multicenter, randomized feasibility trial.在急诊科的脓毒症成人中,限制液体与标准治疗相比(REFACED):一项多中心、随机可行性试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Oct;29(10):1172-1184. doi: 10.1111/acem.14546. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
8
Risk factors for mortality from sepsis in an intensive care unit in Ecuador: A prospective study.厄瓜多尔重症监护病房脓毒症患者死亡的危险因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Mar 18;101(11). doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029096.
9
Early fluid bolus in adults with sepsis in the emergency department: a systematic review, meta-analysis and narrative synthesis.急诊脓毒症成人早期液体冲击治疗:系统评价、荟萃分析和叙述性综合。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Jan 11;22(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00558-5.
10
Fluid resuscitation and outcomes in heart failure patients with severe sepsis or septic shock: A retrospective case-control study.严重脓毒症或感染性休克心力衰竭患者的液体复苏与结局:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 19;16(8):e0256368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256368. eCollection 2021.