Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Institute of Public Health, Section of Nursing, University of Aarhus, Aarhus C, Denmark.
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Jun;28(11-12):2214-2224. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14817. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
To explore patients' and healthcare professionals' experiences of patients' surgical pathways in a perioperative setting.
Elective surgical pathways have improved over the past decades due to fast-track programmes, but patients desire more personalised and coordinated care and treatment. There is little knowledge of how healthcare professionals' collaboration and communication affect patients' pathways.
The overall framework was complex intervention method. A phenomenological-hermeneutic approach was used for data analyses. COREQ checklist was used as a guideline to secure accurate and complete reporting of the study.
Field observations (120 hr) and semi-structured interviews (24 patients) were undertaken during 2016-2017. Healthcare professionals involved in the pathways were interviewed: (a) 13 single interviews and (b) 13 focus group interviews (37 healthcare professionals) were conducted. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist was used.
Patients asked for individualised information adapted to their life and illness experiences. Furthermore, healthcare professionals need access to a quick overview of individual patients and their perioperative pathway in the electronic patient journal (EPJ). Agreements made with patients did not always reach the right receiver, there was poor interpersonal communication and the complex teamwork between many healthcare professionals made pathways incoherent and uncoordinated. Healthcare professionals who had the time to talk about other subjects than the disease with smiles and good humour gave patients a feeling of security.
Patients wanted to be treated as individuals, but often they received standard treatment. Healthcare professionals had the intention of treating patients individually, but the EPJ and information provided to patients were not easy to access.
Visible information about the patient's whole pathway could improve healthcare professionals' care and treatment. In addition, systematic feedback from patients' could make it possible to adjust information, care and treatment to achieve a more coherent pathway. Particular attention needs to be paid to how electronic healthcare systems can underpin relational coordination in pathways.
探讨围手术期患者手术路径的患者和医疗保健专业人员的体验。
由于快速通道计划,过去几十年来,择期手术途径有所改善,但患者希望获得更个性化和协调的护理和治疗。对于医疗保健专业人员的协作和沟通如何影响患者的途径知之甚少。
总体框架是复杂的干预方法。使用现象学-诠释学方法进行数据分析。使用 COREQ 清单作为指南,以确保研究报告的准确和完整。
2016-2017 年期间进行了现场观察(120 小时)和半结构化访谈(24 名患者)。参与途径的医疗保健专业人员进行了访谈:(a)进行了 13 次单独访谈;(b)进行了 13 次焦点小组访谈(37 名医疗保健专业人员)。使用了综合定性研究报告标准清单。
患者要求提供个性化信息,以适应他们的生活和疾病经历。此外,医疗保健专业人员需要在电子患者记录(EPJ)中快速了解各个患者及其围手术期途径。与患者达成的协议并不总是到达正确的接收者,人际沟通不畅,许多医疗保健专业人员之间的复杂团队合作使得途径不连贯且不协调。那些有时间与患者交谈,面带微笑,幽默风趣地谈论疾病以外的话题的医疗保健专业人员,让患者感到安心。
患者希望得到个体化治疗,但通常他们接受的是标准治疗。医疗保健专业人员有意对患者进行个体化治疗,但 EPJ 和向患者提供的信息不易获取。
有关患者整个途径的可见信息可以改善医疗保健专业人员的护理和治疗。此外,来自患者的系统反馈可以使调整信息、护理和治疗成为可能,以实现更连贯的途径。特别需要注意的是,电子医疗系统如何能够支持途径中的关系协调。