Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jun;69(6):1694-1703. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.09.028. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for selected type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is a standard treatment; however, TBAD involving the aortic arch is difficult to treat because of the need for arch vessel reconstruction. We report our initial results of TEVAR for uncomplicated TBAD involving the arch vessels using a semicustom-made fenestrated stent graft.
This is a retrospective study of 24 patients treated by fenestrated (F group) or debranching (D group) TEVAR from August 2011 to July 2017. The patients in the F group received the Najuta semicustom-made fenestrated stent graft (Kawasumi Laboratories, Tokyo, Japan). The fenestrated graft ensures sufficient sealing at the proximal healthy aorta without the need for arch vessel reconstruction. The primary end point was aorta-related mortality; the secondary end points were technical success and major adverse events (stroke, type IA endoleak, retrograde type A aortic dissection, and secondary intervention).
During the study period, we treated 65 TBAD cases by TEVAR, including 17 complicated cases. Of the 48 uncomplicated cases, 24 underwent TEVAR with arch vessel involvement (13 in the F group and 11 in the D group). The technical success rates in the F and D groups were 92.3% and 100.0%, respectively (P > .99, NS). The mean operation time was significantly shorter in the F group (158 minutes) than in the D group (202 minutes; P = .0426), and the mean postoperative hospital stay was also significantly shorter in the F group (7 days) than in the D group (22 days; P = .0168). The primary patency rate of the reconstructed branch vessel was 100%, and there were no aorta-related deaths or retrograde type A aortic dissection in either group. One patient had a type IA endoleak in the F group. In the D group, one patient had a postoperative stroke and two patients required secondary interventions for stent graft-induced new entry at the descending aorta. The median follow-up period was 14.1 months (range, 1-37 months). The rate of freedom from aorta-related death was 100% in both groups (P > .99, NS); the rate of freedom from major adverse events at 24 months was 92.3% in the F group and 72.7% in the D group (P = .749, NS).
The initial results of TEVAR with aortic arch vessel reconstruction for uncomplicated TBAD were acceptable. The fenestrated graft may be a less invasive option for the treatment of TBAD involving the aortic arch.
对于特定类型 B 型主动脉夹层(TBAD),胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)是一种标准治疗方法;然而,由于需要进行弓部血管重建,涉及主动脉弓的 TBAD 治疗难度较大。我们报告了使用半定制开窗支架移植物治疗涉及弓部血管的单纯 TBAD 的初步结果。
这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2011 年 8 月至 2017 年 7 月期间接受开窗(F 组)或去分支(D 组) TEVAR 治疗的 24 例患者。F 组患者接受了 Najuta 半定制开窗支架移植物(日本东京川崎实验室)治疗。开窗移植物可确保在近端健康主动脉处充分密封,而无需进行弓部血管重建。主要终点是与主动脉相关的死亡率;次要终点是技术成功率和主要不良事件(卒中、IA 型内漏、逆行性 A 型主动脉夹层和二次介入)。
在研究期间,我们通过 TEVAR 治疗了 65 例 TBAD 病例,其中 17 例为复杂病例。在 48 例单纯 TBAD 病例中,有 24 例接受了涉及弓部血管的 TEVAR 治疗(F 组 13 例,D 组 11 例)。F 组和 D 组的技术成功率分别为 92.3%和 100.0%(P>.99,NS)。F 组的手术时间明显短于 D 组(158 分钟比 202 分钟;P=0.0426),F 组的术后住院时间也明显短于 D 组(7 天比 22 天;P=0.0168)。重建分支血管的通畅率为 100%,两组均无与主动脉相关的死亡或逆行性 A 型主动脉夹层。F 组有 1 例患者出现 IA 型内漏。D 组有 1 例患者术后发生卒中,2 例患者因支架移植物导致降主动脉新发入口而行二次介入治疗。中位随访时间为 14.1 个月(范围 1-37 个月)。两组的主动脉相关死亡率均为 100%(P>.99,NS);F 组 24 个月时免于重大不良事件的发生率为 92.3%,D 组为 72.7%(P=0.749,NS)。
对于单纯 TBAD 采用主动脉弓部血管重建的 TEVAR 的初步结果是可以接受的。开窗支架移植物可能是一种治疗涉及主动脉弓的 TBAD 的微创选择。