Kaura Tarun, Willingham Field F, Chawla Saurabh
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aurora St Luke's Medical center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Milwaukee, WI 53215, United States.
Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Feb 16;11(2):155-167. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i2.155.
Per-oral pancreatoscopy (POP) plays a role in the diagnosis and therapy of pancreatic diseases. With recent technological advances, there has been renewed interest in this modality.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of POP in management of pancreatic stone disease and pancreatic ductal neoplasia.
To determine the safety and efficacy of POP in the management of pancreatic diseases, a systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Ovid. Articles in languages other than English and case reports were excluded. All published case series were eligible. Data specific to POP were extracted from studies, which combined cholangiopancreatoscopy. Ten studies were included in the analysis of POP therapy for pancreatic stone disease, and 15 case series satisfied the criteria for inclusion for the role of POP in the management of pancreatic ductal neoplasia. The examined data were subcategorized according to adjunctive modalities, such as direct tissue sampling, cytology, the role of intraoperative POP, intraductal ultrasound (IDUS) and POP combined with image-enhancing technology.
The success rate for complete ductal stone clearance ranged from 37.5%-100%. Factors associated with failure included the presence of strictures, multiple stones and the inability to visualize the target area. Although direct visualization can identify malignant and premalignant conditions, there is significant overlap with benign diseases. Visually-directed biopsies provide a high degree of accuracy, and represent a unique approach for tissue acquisition in patients with ductal abnormalities. Addition of pancreatic fluid cytology increases diagnostic yield for indeterminate lesions. Protrusions larger than 3 mm noted on IDUS are significantly more likely to be associated with malignancy. The rate of adverse events associated with POP ranged from 0%-35%.
Current evidence supports wider adoption of pancreatoscopy, as it is safe and effective. Improved patient selection and utilization of novel technologies may further enhance its role in managing pancreatic disease.
经口胰管镜检查(POP)在胰腺疾病的诊断和治疗中发挥着作用。随着近期技术的进步,人们对这种检查方式重新产生了兴趣。
评估经口胰管镜检查在胰腺结石病和胰腺导管肿瘤管理中的有效性和安全性。
为确定经口胰管镜检查在胰腺疾病管理中的安全性和有效性,我们在MEDLINE、EMBASE和Ovid数据库中进行了系统检索。排除非英文文章和病例报告。所有已发表的病例系列均符合要求。从结合了胆管胰管镜检查的研究中提取特定于经口胰管镜检查的数据。10项研究纳入了经口胰管镜检查治疗胰腺结石病的分析,15个病例系列符合经口胰管镜检查在胰腺导管肿瘤管理中作用的纳入标准。所检查的数据根据辅助方式进行了分类,如直接组织采样、细胞学检查、术中经口胰管镜检查的作用、导管内超声(IDUS)以及经口胰管镜检查与图像增强技术的联合应用。
完全清除导管结石的成功率在37.5%至100%之间。与失败相关的因素包括存在狭窄、多发结石以及无法观察到目标区域。尽管直接观察可以识别恶性和癌前病变,但与良性疾病存在显著重叠。直视下活检具有高度准确性,是导管异常患者获取组织的独特方法。增加胰腺液细胞学检查可提高不确定病变的诊断率。在导管内超声检查中发现大于3毫米的隆起与恶性肿瘤的相关性显著更高。与经口胰管镜检查相关的不良事件发生率在0%至35%之间。
目前的证据支持更广泛地采用胰管镜检查,因为它安全有效。改善患者选择和新技术的应用可能会进一步增强其在胰腺疾病管理中的作用。