Suppr超能文献

Sabin 活疫苗衍生和野生型脊灰病毒株制备的灭活脊灰疫苗的抗原结构差异:对疫苗效力检测的影响。

Differences in Antigenic Structure of Inactivated Polio Vaccines Made From Sabin Live-Attenuated and Wild-Type Poliovirus Strains: Impact on Vaccine Potency Assays.

机构信息

Division of Virology, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, Herts, United Kingdom.

Division of Biostatistics, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, Herts, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Infect Dis. 2020 Feb 3;221(4):544-552. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz076.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Following the declaration of wild-type 2 poliovirus eradication in 2015, the type 2 component was removed from the live-attenuated oral polio vaccine (OPV). This change implies a need to improve global coverage through routine immunization with inactivated polio vaccine (IPV), to ensure type 2 immunity. Several manufacturers use Sabin OPV strains for IPV production (sIPV), rather than the usual wild-type strains used for conventional IPV (cIPV). However, in contrast to cIPV, potency assays for sIPV have not been standardized, no international references exist, and no antigen units have been defined for a sIPV human dose. Thus, sIPV products from different manufacturers cannot be compared, and the relationship between antigenicity and immunogenicity of sIPV is not well understood.

METHODS

A collaborative study was conducted in which laboratories used different methods to measure the antigen content of a set of sIPV and cIPV samples with an aim to identify a suitable reference for sIPV products.

RESULTS

The study revealed differences in the reactivity of antibody reagents to cIPV and sIPV products.

CONCLUSIONS

Homologous references are required to measure the antigen content of IPV products consistently. The first World Health Organization international standard for sIPV was established, with new, specific Sabin D-antigen units assigned.

摘要

背景

2015 年宣布野生型 2 型脊灰病毒根除后,2 型成分已从减毒口服脊髓灰质炎疫苗(OPV)中去除。这一变化意味着需要通过常规使用灭活脊髓灰质炎疫苗(IPV)来提高全球覆盖率,以确保 2 型免疫力。几家制造商使用 Sabin OPV 株生产 IPV(sIPV),而不是通常用于传统 IPV(cIPV)的野生型株。然而,与 cIPV 不同,sIPV 的效力检测尚未标准化,没有国际参考标准,也没有为 sIPV 人用剂量定义抗原单位。因此,不同制造商的 sIPV 产品无法进行比较,并且 sIPV 的抗原性和免疫原性之间的关系也不明确。

方法

进行了一项合作研究,实验室使用不同的方法来测量一组 sIPV 和 cIPV 样本的抗原含量,目的是为 sIPV 产品确定合适的参考标准。

结果

该研究揭示了抗体试剂对 cIPV 和 sIPV 产品反应性的差异。

结论

需要同源参考标准来一致测量 IPV 产品的抗原含量。建立了第一个世界卫生组织 sIPV 国际标准,赋予了新的、特定的 Sabin D 抗原单位。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验