Suppr超能文献

手动模态中语义类别和象似性表现类型的系统映射:无声手势的规范数据库。

Systematic mappings between semantic categories and types of iconic representations in the manual modality: A normed database of silent gesture.

机构信息

English Language and Applied Linguistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2020 Feb;52(1):51-67. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01204-6.

Abstract

An unprecedented number of empirical studies have shown that iconic gestures-those that mimic the sensorimotor attributes of a referent-contribute significantly to language acquisition, perception, and processing. However, there has been a lack of normed studies describing generalizable principles in gesture production and in comprehension of the mappings of different types of iconic strategies (i.e., modes of representation; Müller, 2013). In Study 1 we elicited silent gestures in order to explore the implementation of different types of iconic representation (i.e., acting, representing, drawing, and personification) to express concepts across five semantic domains. In Study 2 we investigated the degree of meaning transparency (i.e., iconicity ratings) of the gestures elicited in Study 1. We found systematicity in the gestural forms of 109 concepts across all participants, with different types of iconicity aligning with specific semantic domains: Acting was favored for actions and manipulable objects, drawing for nonmanipulable objects, and personification for animate entities. Interpretation of gesture-meaning transparency was modulated by the interaction between mode of representation and semantic domain, with some couplings being more transparent than others: Acting yielded higher ratings for actions, representing for object-related concepts, personification for animate entities, and drawing for nonmanipulable entities. This study provides mapping principles that may extend to all forms of manual communication (gesture and sign). This database includes a list of the most systematic silent gestures in the group of participants, a notation of the form of each gesture based on four features (hand configuration, orientation, placement, and movement), each gesture's mode of representation, iconicity ratings, and professionally filmed videos that can be used for experimental and clinical endeavors.

摘要

大量的实证研究表明,象征性手势——那些模仿所指对象的感觉运动属性的手势——对语言习得、感知和处理有重要贡献。然而,对于手势产生和理解不同类型的象征性策略(即表示模式;Müller,2013)的可推广原则,缺乏规范的研究。在研究 1 中,我们引出了无声手势,以探索不同类型的象征性表示(即表演、代表、绘画和拟人化)在五个语义领域中表达概念的实现。在研究 2 中,我们调查了研究 1 中引出的手势的意义透明度(即象征性评分)程度。我们发现,所有参与者的 109 个概念的手势形式都具有系统性,不同类型的象征性与特定的语义领域相匹配:表演适用于动作和可操纵的物体,绘画适用于不可操纵的物体,拟人化适用于有生命的实体。对手势意义透明度的解释受到表示模式和语义领域之间相互作用的调节,一些结合比其他结合更透明:表演对于动作的评分较高,代表对于与物体相关的概念,拟人化对于有生命的实体,绘画对于不可操纵的实体。这项研究提供了可能扩展到所有形式的手动交流(手势和手语)的映射原则。该数据库包括一组参与者中最系统的无声手势列表、根据四个特征(手型、方向、位置和运动)对每个手势形式的符号、每个手势的表示模式、象征性评分以及可用于实验和临床工作的专业拍摄视频。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验