Trinh Vincent Q-H, Pelletier Mathieu P, Echelard Philippe, Warkus Thomas, Sauthier Philippe, Gougeon François, Mès-Masson Anne-Marie, Provencher Diane M, Rahimi Kurosh
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2020 Mar;39(2):128-135. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000591.
The origin of serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (SEIC) is debated, due to its premalignant and independently malignant nature. It often arises next to endometrial serous carcinoma (ESC), with a propensity for polypoid growth. We aimed to better characterize this discrepancy by analyzing the clinical, histologic, and immunohistochemical features of polypoid carcinoma associated with SEIC (P-SEIC), and compared them with usual endometrial serous carcinoma without SEIC (UESC). Consecutive patients with P-SEIC were recruited and compared with UESC controls from our institutional research center. Clinical, histologic, and immunohistochemical (IHC, ER, PR, P53, Napsin-A, WT1, P16) were analyzed. BRCA testing results and familial history were also extracted from clinical databases. Welch T test, Pearson χ, and Fisher exact test were performed in SPSS version 23. A total of 37 P-SEIC and 25 UESC were the basis of a case-control study. P-SEIC was associated with more bilateral ovarian involvement (P=0.026), yet showed lower rates of myometrial invasion (P=0.002). P-SEIC showed a statistically different IHC profile: p53+, p16+, ER+, PR+, and WT-1+, and high rates of Napsin-A, while UESC was p53+, p16+, WT-1-, Napsin-A-, with lower rates of ER and PR. We also identified 2 patients who received prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy for BRCA mutations and who subsequently developed P-SEIC with its unique IHC pattern. Our results suggest different underlying expression profiles and possibly diverging molecular signatures between both P-SEIC and UESC. If confirmed in further molecular studies, it could lead to a distinct molecular subclass.
浆液性子宫内膜上皮内癌(SEIC)的起源存在争议,因其具有癌前病变和独立恶性的性质。它常发生于子宫内膜浆液性癌(ESC)附近,有息肉样生长的倾向。我们旨在通过分析与SEIC相关的息肉样癌(P-SEIC)的临床、组织学和免疫组化特征,更好地描述这种差异,并将其与无SEIC的普通子宫内膜浆液性癌(UESC)进行比较。从我们机构的研究中心招募了连续的P-SEIC患者,并与UESC对照组进行比较。分析了临床、组织学和免疫组化(IHC、ER、PR、P53、Napsin-A、WT1、P16)情况。还从临床数据库中提取了BRCA检测结果和家族史。在SPSS 23版中进行了韦尔奇T检验、皮尔逊χ检验和费舍尔精确检验。一项病例对照研究以37例P-SEIC和25例UESC为基础。P-SEIC与更多的双侧卵巢受累相关(P = 0.026),但肌层浸润率较低(P = 0.002)。P-SEIC显示出统计学上不同的免疫组化特征:p53+、p16+、ER+、PR+和WT-1+,Napsin-A阳性率高,而UESC为p53+、p16+、WT-1-、Napsin-A-,ER和PR阳性率较低。我们还确定了2例因BRCA突变接受预防性输卵管卵巢切除术的患者,他们随后发展为具有独特免疫组化模式的P-SEIC。我们的结果表明,P-SEIC和UESC之间存在不同的潜在表达谱,可能还有不同的分子特征。如果在进一步的分子研究中得到证实,可能会导致一个独特的分子亚类。