Neurology Clinic, Clinical Center of Serbia, School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 6, Dr. Subotic Street, Belgrade, 11000, Serbia.
Clinic for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, Clinical Center of Serbia, Dr Subotica starijeg 13, Belgrade, Serbia.
Neurol Sci. 2019 May;40(5):1035-1040. doi: 10.1007/s10072-019-03763-0. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
To date, there are only several reports on body composition in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and there are no data for myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2). The aim was to analyze body composition of patients with DM1 and DM2, and its association with socio-demographic and clinical features of the diseases.
There were no statistical differences in sociodemographic features between 20 DM1 patients and 12 DM2 patients. Body composition was assessed by DEXA (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry). A three-compartment model was used: bone mineral content (BMC), fat mass (FM), and lean tissue mass (LTM).
Patients with DM1 and DM2 had similar total body mass (TBM), BMC, FM, and LTM. Patients with DM1 had higher trunk-limb fat index (TLFI) in comparison to DM2 patients which indicates visceral fat deposition in DM1 (1.16 ± 0.32 for DM1 vs. 0.87 ± 0.23 for DM2, p < 0.05). Right ribs bone mineral density was lower in DM2 group (0.68 ± 0.07 g/cm vs. 0.61 ± 0.09 g/cm, p < 0.05). Higher percentage of FM in legs showed correlation with lower strength of the upper leg muscles in DM1 (ρ = - 0.47, p < 0.05). Higher muscle strength in DM2 patients was in correlation with higher bone mineral density (ρ = + 0.62, p < 0.05 for upper arm muscles, ρ = + 0.87, p < 0.01 for lower arm muscles, ρ = + 0.72, p < 0.05 for lower leg muscles).
DM1 patients had visceral obesity, and percentage of FM correlated with a degree of muscle weakness in upper legs. In DM2 patients, degree of muscle weakness was in correlation with higher FM index and lower bone mineral density.
迄今为止,仅有少数关于 1 型肌强直性营养不良(DM1)患者身体成分的报告,而 2 型肌强直性营养不良(DM2)患者的相关数据则没有。本研究旨在分析 DM1 和 DM2 患者的身体成分,并探讨其与疾病的社会人口统计学和临床特征的关系。
20 名 DM1 患者和 12 名 DM2 患者在社会人口统计学特征方面无统计学差异。通过 DEXA(双能 X 线吸收法)评估身体成分。使用三腔模型:骨矿物质含量(BMC)、脂肪量(FM)和瘦组织量(LTM)。
DM1 和 DM2 患者的总体重(TBM)、BMC、FM 和 LTM 相似。与 DM2 患者相比,DM1 患者的躯干-肢体脂肪指数(TLFI)更高,这表明 DM1 患者存在内脏脂肪沉积(1.16±0.32 对 0.87±0.23,p<0.05)。DM2 组右侧肋骨骨密度较低(0.68±0.07 g/cm 对 0.61±0.09 g/cm,p<0.05)。DM1 患者腿部 FM 百分比较高与大腿肌肉力量较低呈负相关(ρ=-0.47,p<0.05)。DM2 患者肌肉力量较高与骨矿物质密度较高呈正相关(ρ=+0.62,p<0.05 为上臂肌肉,ρ=+0.87,p<0.01 为前臂肌肉,ρ=+0.72,p<0.05 为小腿肌肉)。
DM1 患者存在内脏肥胖,FM 百分比与大腿肌肉无力程度相关。在 DM2 患者中,肌肉无力程度与较高的 FM 指数和较低的骨矿物质密度相关。