Arabehety J T, Leitão O R, Fassler S, Olarte M, Serrano C
Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín, National University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Clin Ther. 1988;10(4):421-8.
In a double-blind, randomized study, the clinical effects of 5 mg and 10 mg of cisapride three times daily were compared with those of 10 mg of metoclopramide three times daily in 114 patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux, mainly diurnal and nocturnal heartburn and regurgitation. The symptoms significantly (P less than 0.001) improved in the three groups; the mean severity score decreased by at least 78% after four weeks of treatment. Initial symptoms were more severe in the cisapride-treated patients, especially in those receiving 10 mg three times daily; however, the patients' condition after four weeks was similar in the three groups. Central nervous system side effects were reported by one patient from each of the cisapride-treated groups and by nine of the 43 metoclopramide-treated patients (P less than 0.02). Six metoclopramide-treated patients and one cisapride-treated patient dropped out of the study because of side effects. These findings favor the use of cisapride when prokinetic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux is considered.
在一项双盲随机研究中,对114例有胃食管反流症状(主要是日间和夜间烧心及反流)的患者,比较了每日3次服用5毫克和10毫克西沙必利的临床效果与每日3次服用10毫克甲氧氯普胺的临床效果。三组症状均有显著改善(P<0.001);治疗四周后平均严重程度评分至少降低78%。西沙必利治疗组患者的初始症状更严重,尤其是每日3次服用10毫克的患者;然而,四周后三组患者的病情相似。西沙必利治疗组各有1例患者报告有中枢神经系统副作用,甲氧氯普胺治疗的43例患者中有9例报告有该副作用(P< 0.02)。6例甲氧氯普胺治疗患者和1例西沙必利治疗患者因副作用退出研究。当考虑对胃食管反流进行促动力治疗时,这些结果支持使用西沙必利。