1 Faculty of Fine Arts and Music, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
2 Norwegian Academy of Music, Oslo, Norway.
Clin Rehabil. 2019 Jun;33(6):1045-1055. doi: 10.1177/0269215519831417. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
To determine the size of the effects and feasibility (recruitment and retention rates) of a therapeutic songwriting protocol for in-patients and community-dwelling people with acquired brain injury or spinal cord injury.
Randomized controlled trial with songwriting intervention and care-as-usual control groups, in a mixed measures design assessed at three time points.
A total of 47 participants (3 in-patients with acquired brain injury, 20 community participants with acquired brain injury, 12 in-patients with spinal cord injury, and 12 community participants with spinal cord injury: 23 1208 days post injury).
The intervention group received a 12-session identity-targeted songwriting programme, where participants created three songs reflecting on perceptions of past, present, and future self. Control participants received care as usual.
Baseline, postintervention, and follow-up measures comprised the Head Injury Semantic Differential Scale (primary outcome measure), Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, and Satisfaction with Life Scale.
No significant between group pre-post intervention differences were found on the primary self-concept measure, the Head Injury Semantic Differential Scale ( p = 0.38, d = 0.44). Significant and large effect sizes from baseline to post between groups in favour of the songwriting group for Satisfaction with Life ( p = 0.04, n = 0.14). There were no significant between group pre-post interaction effects for the Emotion Regulation Suppression subscale ( p = 0.12, n = -0.08) although scores decreased in the songwriting group over time while increasing for the standard care group. There were no significant differences in baseline to follow-up between groups in any other outcome measures. Recruitment was challenging due to the small number of people eligible to participate combined with poor uptake by eligible participants, particularly the in-patient group. Retention rates were higher for the community-dwelling cohorts.
This study demonstrates the challenges in recruitment and retention of participants invited to participate in a music therapy study. Findings suggest this identity-focused therapeutic songwriting protocols may be more beneficial for people who have transitioned from in-patient to community-contexts given the greater proportion of participants who consent and complete the intervention. Preliminary effects in favour of the intervention group were detected in a range of well-being measures suggesting that a larger study is warranted.
确定治疗性歌曲创作方案对住院患者和社区居住的后天性脑损伤或脊髓损伤患者的效果和可行性(招募率和保留率)。
采用随机对照试验,歌曲创作干预组和常规护理对照组,采用混合措施设计,在三个时间点进行评估。
共 47 名参与者(3 名后天性脑损伤住院患者,20 名后天性脑损伤社区参与者,12 名脊髓损伤住院患者,12 名脊髓损伤社区参与者:23 名 1208 天伤后)。
干预组接受 12 节以身份为目标的歌曲创作方案,参与者创作三首反映过去、现在和未来自我感知的歌曲。对照组接受常规护理。
基线、干预后和随访测量包括头部损伤语义差异量表(主要测量指标)、患者健康问卷-9、情绪调节问卷和生活满意度量表。
在主要自我概念测量上,头部损伤语义差异量表( p = 0.38,d = 0.44),干预组与对照组在组间的预干预后差异无统计学意义。在歌曲创作组的生活满意度方面,从基线到干预后的组间有显著的大效应量( p = 0.04,n = 0.14)。情绪调节抑制分量表的组间预干预交互作用无统计学意义( p = 0.12,n = -0.08),尽管随着时间的推移,歌曲创作组的分数下降,而常规护理组的分数上升。在任何其他结果测量中,组间从基线到随访均无显著差异。由于符合条件的参与者人数较少,再加上符合条件的参与者参与度低,特别是住院患者组,招募工作极具挑战性。保留率在社区居住者中更高。
本研究表明,邀请参与音乐治疗研究的参与者在招募和保留方面存在挑战。研究结果表明,由于更多的参与者同意并完成干预,这种以身份为重点的治疗性歌曲创作方案可能对从住院到社区环境过渡的患者更有益。在一系列幸福感测量中,发现干预组有初步的有利影响,表明需要进行更大规模的研究。