Wellbeing and Resilience Centre, Lifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Órama Institute for Mental Health and Wellbeing, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 May;5(5):631-652. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01093-w. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
Our current understanding of the efficacy of psychological interventions in improving mental states of wellbeing is incomplete. This study aimed to overcome limitations of previous reviews by examining the efficacy of distinct types of psychological interventions, irrespective of their theoretical underpinning, and the impact of various moderators, in a unified systematic review and meta-analysis. Four-hundred-and-nineteen randomized controlled trials from clinical and non-clinical populations (n = 53,288) were identified for inclusion. Mindfulness-based and multi-component positive psychological interventions demonstrated the greatest efficacy in both clinical and non-clinical populations. Meta-analyses also found that singular positive psychological interventions, cognitive and behavioural therapy-based, acceptance and commitment therapy-based, and reminiscence interventions were impactful. Effect sizes were moderate at best, but differed according to target population and moderator, most notably intervention intensity. The evidence quality was generally low to moderate. While the evidence requires further advancement, the review provides insight into how psychological interventions can be designed to improve mental wellbeing.
我们目前对于心理干预在改善心理健康状态方面的效果的理解并不完整。本研究旨在通过检查不同类型的心理干预的效果,克服以往综述的局限性,这些干预无论其理论基础如何,以及在统一的系统评价和荟萃分析中各种调节因素的影响。从临床和非临床人群中确定了 419 项随机对照试验(n=53288)进行纳入。正念和多成分积极心理干预在临床和非临床人群中均显示出最大的效果。荟萃分析还发现,单一的积极心理干预、认知和行为治疗为基础、接受和承诺治疗为基础以及怀旧干预都有效果。效果大小充其量只是中等,但根据目标人群和调节因素而有所不同,最显著的是干预强度。证据质量普遍较低至中等。虽然证据需要进一步提高,但该综述提供了一些见解,了解如何设计心理干预以改善心理健康。