• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国北京一项免费治疗精神分裂症药物方案的成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness of a free drug program for schizophrenia in Beijing, China.

机构信息

1 The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders Beijing Anding Hospital & the Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, School of Mental Health, Beijing, China.

2 Beijing Mental Health Care Institute, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;65(1):28-37. doi: 10.1177/0020764018815200. Epub 2018 Nov 30.

DOI:10.1177/0020764018815200
PMID:30791795
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Beijing municipal government launched a Free Drug Program (FDP) in 2013 to reduce the financial burden of schizophrenia patients.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the cost-effectiveness of a FDP designed for schizophrenia patients in Beijing, China.

METHODS

In all, 2007 schizophrenia patients enrolled in an FDP (FDP group) and 2001 schizophrenia patients who were not enrolled (non-FDP group) were randomly selected for a cross-sectional survey in August 2015. The study sought to develop a cost-effectiveness model to assess the FDP from the societal perspective in Beijing, China. Scenario analyses explored the potential strategies to further improve the cost-effectiveness of the FDP.

RESULTS

The FDP group was associated with lower socioeconomic status and more advanced disease than the non-FDP group (unemployment rate: 48.8% vs 37.3%, p < .001; disability rate: 91.2% vs 64.1%, p < .001; overall comorbidity rate: 34.9% vs 28.8%, p < .001). The two groups exhibited similar disease severity and quality of life. However, the FDP group was associated with significantly lower direct medical costs (coefficient -.342, p = .003) and indirect costs (coefficient -.473, p < .001) than the non-FDP group. The base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per gained quality-adjusted life year (QALY) for the FDP group relative to the non-FDP group was 1.480 times of 2015 China's gross domestic product per capita. Home drug delivery and long-lasting injection treatment could reduce the ICER for the FDP group relative to the non-FDP group by 57.8% and 29.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The FDP was attractive to schizophrenia patients with lower socioeconomic status and more advanced disease. The cost-effectiveness of the FDP was acceptable and could be further improved by home drug delivery and long-lasting injection treatment.

摘要

背景

北京市政府于 2013 年启动了免费药物计划(FDP),以减轻精神分裂症患者的经济负担。

目的

评估专为中国北京精神分裂症患者设计的 FDP 的成本效益。

方法

2015 年 8 月,我们随机选择了 2007 名参加 FDP 的精神分裂症患者(FDP 组)和 2001 名未参加 FDP 的精神分裂症患者(非 FDP 组)进行横断面调查。该研究旨在从中国北京的社会角度建立一个 FDP 的成本效益模型。情景分析探讨了进一步提高 FDP 成本效益的潜在策略。

结果

与非 FDP 组相比,FDP 组的社会经济地位较低,疾病程度较严重(失业率:48.8%比 37.3%,p<0.001;残疾率:91.2%比 64.1%,p<0.001;总合并症发生率:34.9%比 28.8%,p<0.001)。两组的疾病严重程度和生活质量相似。然而,FDP 组的直接医疗费用(系数-.342,p=0.003)和间接费用(系数-.473,p<0.001)明显低于非 FDP 组。FDP 组相对于非 FDP 组每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本效益比(ICER)为 2015 年中国人均国内生产总值的 1.480 倍。家庭药物配送和长效注射治疗可使 FDP 组相对于非 FDP 组的 ICER 分别降低 57.8%和 29.8%。

结论

FDP 对社会经济地位较低、疾病程度较严重的精神分裂症患者具有吸引力。FDP 的成本效益是可以接受的,通过家庭药物配送和长效注射治疗可以进一步提高其成本效益。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of a free drug program for schizophrenia in Beijing, China.中国北京一项免费治疗精神分裂症药物方案的成本效益分析。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;65(1):28-37. doi: 10.1177/0020764018815200. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
2
[Comparison of medical and economic benefits of antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia in France].[法国抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症的医学与经济效益比较]
Encephale. 2017 Aug;43(4):311-320. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.02.021. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
3
Cost Effectiveness of Paliperidone Long-Acting Injectable Versus Other Antipsychotics for the Maintenance Treatment of Schizophrenia in France.在法国,帕利哌酮长效注射剂与其他抗精神病药物用于精神分裂症维持治疗的成本效益分析
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Apr;34(4):363-91. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0348-x.
4
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Aripiprazole Once-Monthly for the Treatment of Schizophrenia in the UK.阿立哌唑每月一次治疗英国精神分裂症的成本效益分析。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2015 Dec;18(4):185-200.
5
Economic burden of schizophrenia: empirical analyses from a survey in Thailand.精神分裂症的经济负担:来自泰国一项调查的实证分析。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2012 Mar;15(1):25-32.
6
Cost-effectiveness of second-generation antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia.第二代抗精神病药治疗精神分裂症的成本效益。
Value Health. 2014 Jun;17(4):310-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 May 10.
7
Cost-effectiveness of olanzapine in the first-line treatment of schizophrenia in China.奥氮平在中国精神分裂症一线治疗中的成本效益
J Med Econ. 2019 May;22(5):439-446. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1580714. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
8
Cost effectiveness of paliperidone palmitate for the treatment of schizophrenia in Germany.在德国,棕榈酸帕利哌酮治疗精神分裂症的成本效益
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Oct;11(5):509-21. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0050-0.
9
Pharmacoeconomics of depot antipsychotics for treating chronic schizophrenia in Sweden.瑞典长效抗精神病药物治疗慢性精神分裂症的药物经济学
Nord J Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;68(6):416-27. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2013.852243. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of switching antipsychotic medication to long-acting injectable risperidone in patients with schizophrenia : a 12- and 24-month follow-up from the e-STAR database in Spain.精神分裂症患者抗精神病药物换用长效注射用利培酮的成本效益分析:来自西班牙e-STAR数据库的12个月和24个月随访
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2008;6(1):41-53. doi: 10.2165/00148365-200806010-00004.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of community-based rehabilitation for mental illness on 'out of pocket' expenditure in rural South India.社区精神康复对印度南部农村地区精神疾病患者自付费用的影响。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2019 Aug;44:138-142. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2019.07.029. Epub 2019 Jul 14.