Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
BMC Med. 2019 Feb 22;17(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1274-0.
Adopting clinical genomics represents a major systems-level intervention requiring diverse expertise and collective learning. The Australian Genomic Health Alliance (Australian Genomics) is strategically linking members and partner organisations to lead the integration of genomic medicine into healthcare across Australia. This study aimed to map and analyse interconnections between members-a key feature of complexity-to capture the collaborations among the genomic community, document learning, assess Australian Genomics' influence and identify key players.
An online, whole network study collected relational data from members asking them about two time points: baseline, before Australian Genomics started operation in 2016 and current in 2018. Likert style questions assessed the influence of various sources of knowledge on the respondents' genomic practice. A secure link to the online questionnaire was distributed to all members of Australian Genomics during May 2018. Social network data was analysed and visually constructed using Gephi 0.9.2 software, and Likert questions were analysed using chi-squared computations in SPSS. The project was given ethical approval.
Response rate was 57.81% (222/384). The genomic learning community within Australian Genomics was constructed from the responses of participants. There was a growth in ties from pre-2016 (2925 ties) to 2018 (6381 ties) and an increase in density (0.020 to 0.043) suggesting the strong influence of Australian Genomics in creating this community. Respondents nominated 355 collaborative partners from 24 different countries outside of Australia and 328 partners from within Australia but outside the alliance. Key players were the Australian Genomics Manager, two clinical geneticists and four Operational staff members. Most influential sources of learning were hands on learning, shared decision making, journal articles and conference presentations in contrast to formal courses.
The successful implementation of clinical genomics requires the engagement of multidisciplinary teams across a range of conditions and expertise. Australian Genomics is shown to be facilitating this collaborative process by strategically building a genomic learning community. We demonstrate the importance of social processes in building complex networks as respondents name "hands on learning" and "making group decisions" the most potent influences of their genomic practice. This has implications for genomic implementation, education and work force strategies.
采用临床基因组学代表了一个需要各种专业知识和集体学习的重大系统干预。澳大利亚基因组健康联盟(Australian Genomics)正在战略性地将成员和合作伙伴组织联系起来,以领导将基因组医学整合到澳大利亚各地的医疗保健中。本研究旨在绘制和分析成员之间的相互联系——这是复杂性的一个关键特征——以捕捉基因组社区之间的合作,记录学习,评估澳大利亚基因组的影响力,并确定关键参与者。
一项在线的全网络研究从成员那里收集关系数据,询问他们两个时间点的情况:基线,即澳大利亚基因组于 2016 年开始运作之前,以及 2018 年的当前情况。李克特式问题评估了各种知识来源对受访者基因组实践的影响。2018 年 5 月,向澳大利亚基因组的所有成员分发了一个到在线问卷的安全链接。使用 Gephi 0.9.2 软件分析社会网络数据并进行可视化构建,并在 SPSS 中使用卡方计算分析李克特问题。该项目获得了伦理批准。
回应率为 57.81%(222/384)。澳大利亚基因组内的基因组学习社区是由参与者的回答构成的。从 2016 年之前(2925 个联系)到 2018 年(6381 个联系),联系有所增加,密度也有所增加(从 0.020 增加到 0.043),这表明澳大利亚基因组在创建这个社区方面具有很强的影响力。受访者提名了来自 24 个不同国家的 355 个合作伙伴,以及来自澳大利亚以外的 328 个合作伙伴。关键参与者是澳大利亚基因组经理、两名临床遗传学家和四名运营人员。最有影响力的学习来源是实践学习、共同决策、期刊文章和会议演讲,而不是正式课程。
临床基因组学的成功实施需要跨多种条件和专业知识的多学科团队的参与。澳大利亚基因组被证明通过战略性地建立一个基因组学习社区,正在促进这一协作过程。我们展示了社会进程在构建复杂网络中的重要性,因为受访者将“实践学习”和“做出集体决策”命名为对他们基因组实践最有力的影响。这对基因组实施、教育和劳动力策略都有影响。