Suppr超能文献

日间医院与强化门诊心理化治疗对边缘型人格障碍的疗效比较:多中心随机临床试验

Day hospital versus intensive out-patient mentalisation-based treatment for borderline personality disorder: multicentre randomised clinical trial.

机构信息

Health Care Psychologist and PhD Student, de Viersprong and the Viersprong Institute for Studies on Personality Disorders, the Netherlands.

Clinical Psychologist and Principal Investigator, de Viersprong, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;216(2):79-84. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Two types of mentalisation-based treatment (MBT) have been developed and empirically evaluated for borderline personality disorder (BPD): day hospital MBT (MBT-DH) and intensive out-patient MBT (MBT-IOP). No trial has yet compared their efficacy.

AIMS

To compare the efficacy of MBT-DH and MBT-IOP 18 months after start of treatment. MBT-DH was hypothesised to be superior to MBT-IOP because of its higher treatment intensity.

METHOD

In a multicentre randomised controlled trial (Nederlands Trial Register: NTR2292) conducted at three sites in the Netherlands, patients with BPD were randomly assigned to MBT-DH (n = 70) or MBT-IOP (n = 44). The primary outcome was symptom severity (Brief Symptom Inventory). Secondary outcome measures included borderline symptomatology, personality functioning, interpersonal functioning, quality of life and self-harm. Patients were assessed every 6 months from baseline to 18 months after start of treatment. Data were analysed using multilevel modelling based on intention-to-treat principles.

RESULTS

Significant improvements were found on all outcome measures, with moderate to very large effect sizes for both groups. MBT-DH was not superior to MBT-IOP on the primary outcome measure, but MBT-DH showed a clear tendency towards superiority on secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although MBT-DH was not superior to MBT-IOP on the primary outcome measure despite its greater treatment intensity, MBT-DH showed a tendency to be more effective on secondary outcomes, particularly in terms of relational functioning. Patients receiving MBT-DH and MBT-IOP, thus, seem to follow different trajectories of change, which may have important implications for clinical decision-making. Longer-term follow-up and cost-effectiveness considerations may ultimately determine the optimal intensity of specialised treatments such as MBT for patients with BPD.

摘要

背景

已经开发出两种基于心理化的治疗(MBT)来治疗边缘型人格障碍(BPD):日间医院 MBT(MBT-DH)和强化门诊 MBT(MBT-IOP)。目前还没有研究比较它们的疗效。

目的

比较 MBT-DH 和 MBT-IOP 在治疗开始后 18 个月的疗效。由于 MBT-DH 的治疗强度更高,因此假设其优于 MBT-IOP。

方法

在荷兰三个地点进行的一项多中心随机对照试验(荷兰试验登记处:NTR2292)中,将 BPD 患者随机分配到 MBT-DH(n = 70)或 MBT-IOP(n = 44)组。主要结局是症状严重程度(Brief Symptom Inventory)。次要结局指标包括边缘症状、人格功能、人际功能、生活质量和自伤。从基线到治疗开始后 18 个月,患者每 6 个月评估一次。使用基于意向治疗原则的多层次建模对数据进行分析。

结果

所有结局指标均有显著改善,两组的效应大小均为中度至非常大。MBT-DH 在主要结局指标上并不优于 MBT-IOP,但 MBT-DH 在次要结局上显示出明显的优势。

结论

尽管 MBT-DH 的治疗强度更大,但在主要结局指标上并不优于 MBT-IOP,但 MBT-DH 在次要结局上显示出更强的疗效倾向,特别是在关系功能方面。因此,接受 MBT-DH 和 MBT-IOP 的患者似乎遵循不同的变化轨迹,这可能对临床决策具有重要意义。长期随访和成本效益考虑最终可能决定 MBT 等专门治疗对 BPD 患者的最佳强度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验