Research Department, 113 Suicide Prevention, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, and GGZinGeest Specialized Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Psychol Med. 2023 Jun;53(8):3261-3280. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723000685. Epub 2023 May 19.
A broad range of psychotherapies have been proposed and evaluated in the treatment of borderline personality disorder (BPD), but the question which specific type of psychotherapy is most effective remains unanswered. In this study, two network meta-analyses (NMAs) were conducted investigating the comparative effectiveness of psychotherapies on (1) BPD severity and (2) suicidal behaviour (combined rate). Study drop-out was included as a secondary outcome. Six databases were searched until 21 January 2022, including RCTs on the efficacy of any psychotherapy in adults (⩾18 years) with a diagnosis of (sub)clinical BPD. Data were extracted using a predefined table format. PROSPERO ID:CRD42020175411. In our study, a total of 43 studies ( = 3273) were included. We found significant differences between several active comparisons in the treatment of (sub)clinical BPD, however, these findings were based on very few trials and should therefore be interpreted with caution. Some therapies were more efficacious compared to GT or TAU. Furthermore, some treatments more than halved the risk of attempted suicide and committed suicide (combined rate), reporting RRs around 0.5 or lower, however, these RRs were not statistically significantly better compared to other therapies or to TAU. Study drop-out significantly differed between some treatments. In conclusion, no single treatment seems to be the best choice to treat people with BPD compared to other treatments. Nevertheless, psychotherapies for BPD are perceived as first-line treatments, and should therefore be investigated further on their long-term effectiveness, preferably in head-to-head trials. DBT was the best connected treatment, providing solid evidence of its effectiveness.
已经提出并评估了广泛的心理治疗方法来治疗边缘型人格障碍(BPD),但哪种特定类型的心理治疗最有效仍未得到解答。在这项研究中,进行了两项网络荟萃分析(NMAs),以调查心理治疗在以下方面的比较效果:(1)BPD 严重程度和(2)自杀行为(合并率)。研究退出被纳入次要结果。直到 2022 年 1 月 21 日,共检索了 6 个数据库,包括针对任何心理治疗在成人(≥18 岁)中对(亚)临床 BPD 的疗效的 RCT。使用预定义的表格格式提取数据。PROSPERO ID:CRD42020175411。在我们的研究中,共有 43 项研究(=3273)被纳入。我们发现,在(亚)临床 BPD 的治疗中,几种活性比较之间存在显著差异,然而,这些发现基于极少数试验,因此应谨慎解释。与 GT 或 TAU 相比,一些疗法更有效。此外,一些治疗方法将自杀未遂和自杀(合并率)的风险降低了一半以上,报告的 RR 约为 0.5 或更低,然而,与其他治疗方法或 TAU 相比,这些 RR 并没有统计学上的显著改善。一些治疗方法之间的研究退出率存在显著差异。总之,与其他治疗方法相比,没有一种单一的治疗方法似乎是治疗 BPD 患者的最佳选择。尽管如此,BPD 的心理治疗被认为是一线治疗方法,因此应该进一步研究它们的长期效果,最好是在头对头试验中。DBT 是连接最好的治疗方法,为其有效性提供了确凿的证据。