• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西药物警戒法规的协调统一:改善风险沟通的机会。

Harmonization of Pharmacovigilance Regulation in Brazil: Opportunities to Improve Risk Communication.

机构信息

Américo Brasiliense State Hospital, Américo Brasiliense, Brazil.

Department of Drugs and Medicines, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, São Paulo State University, Araraquara, Brazil.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2019 Mar;41(3):598-603. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.01.013. Epub 2019 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.01.013
PMID:30792075
Abstract

Brazilian pharmacovigilance regulations involve 3 spheres: health services, Marketing Authorization Holders (MAHs), and sanitary agency. Drug tolerability began to be effectively assessed in Brazil after the founding of the National Agency of Sanitary Surveillance, which developed the Sentinel Network Project. The objective of the Sentinel Network Project is to increase the adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting rate by health care professionals in the hospital setting. Pharmacovigilance practices became mandatory for MAHs, and patient tolerability issues were considered in drug policy in Brazil only as recently as 2000. However, despite recent events, the regulatory advancements in pharmacovigilance in Brazil are only equivalent to international practices (ie, those of the European Union). The pharmacovigilance system in the European Union integrates the national authorities, the European Commission, and the European Medicines Agency, which is responsible for the scientific evaluation, supervision, and safety monitoring of medicines for human and veterinary use in the European Union. Furthermore, ADR patient reporting is included in the new EU pharmacovigilance regulations. Numerous possible ways are available to improve the Brazilian pharmacovigilance system, mainly through regulations of biosimilar, nanotechnology, and veterinary medicines or by training health care professionals and patients to report nonserious cases and quality deviations. It is necessary to encourage and develop strategies for decentralizing pharmacovigilance actions in the whole country, as is common practice in several EU countries. Motivating and considering ADR reports by patients and improving feedback and audit practices in health care services and MAHs are also necessary measures. With the inclusion of Brazil as a member of the International Conference of Harmonization, significant changes in pharmacovigilance regulation are expected; these updates, which will consider international standards, will improve signal detection and risk communication.

摘要

巴西的药物警戒法规涉及三个领域

卫生服务机构、上市许可持有人(MAH)和卫生机构。国家卫生监督局成立后,巴西开始有效评估药物耐受性,该机构开发了哨点网络项目。哨点网络项目的目的是提高医疗机构中医疗保健专业人员报告药物不良反应(ADR)的比率。药物警戒实践对 MAH 成为强制性要求,直到 2000 年巴西的药物政策才开始考虑患者的耐受性问题。然而,尽管最近发生了这些事件,但巴西药物警戒法规的进展仅相当于国际惯例(即欧盟的惯例)。欧盟的药物警戒系统整合了国家主管部门、欧盟委员会和欧洲药品管理局,后者负责对欧盟范围内用于人类和兽医用途的药品进行科学评估、监督和安全性监测。此外,ADR 患者报告也被纳入欧盟新的药物警戒法规。有许多可能的方法可以改进巴西的药物警戒系统,主要通过对生物类似药、纳米技术和兽用药品的监管、培训医疗保健专业人员和患者报告非严重病例和质量偏差来实现。有必要鼓励并制定策略,在全国范围内分散药物警戒行动,这是欧盟几个国家的常见做法。激励并考虑患者的 ADR 报告,并改进医疗保健服务和 MAH 的反馈和审核实践,也是必要的措施。随着巴西加入国际协调会议,预计药物警戒法规将发生重大变化;这些更新将考虑国际标准,将提高信号检测和风险沟通的效率。

相似文献

1
Harmonization of Pharmacovigilance Regulation in Brazil: Opportunities to Improve Risk Communication.巴西药物警戒法规的协调统一:改善风险沟通的机会。
Clin Ther. 2019 Mar;41(3):598-603. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.01.013. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
2
Strengthening and rationalizing pharmacovigilance in the EU: where is Europe heading to? A review of the new EU legislation on pharmacovigilance.加强和合理化欧盟的药物警戒:欧洲将走向何方?对新的欧盟药物警戒立法的审查。
Drug Saf. 2011 Mar 1;34(3):187-97. doi: 10.2165/11586620-000000000-00000.
3
Patient Reporting in the EU: Analysis of EudraVigilance Data.欧盟的患者报告:EudraVigilance数据的分析。
Drug Saf. 2017 Jul;40(7):629-645. doi: 10.1007/s40264-017-0534-1.
4
A review of the National pharmacovigilance system in Malta - implementing and operating a pharmacovigilance management system.马耳他国家药物警戒系统综述——实施和运营药物警戒管理系统
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2017 Jan;16(1):65-76. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2017.1247806. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
5
Issues with regulatory pharmacovigilance in East European countries: the industry perspective.东欧国家药品监管中的药物警戒问题:行业视角
Toxicol Lett. 2007 Feb 5;168(3):228-35. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2006.10.019. Epub 2006 Nov 16.
6
Aggregate analysis of regulatory authority assessors' comments to improve the quality of periodic safety update reports.监管机构评估人员意见的汇总分析,以提高定期安全更新报告的质量。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Sep;24(9):971-9. doi: 10.1002/pds.3818. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
7
Enhancing Pharmacovigilance Capabilities in the EU Regulatory Network: The SCOPE Joint Action.加强欧盟监管网络中的药物警戒能力:SCOPE 联合行动。
Drug Saf. 2018 Dec;41(12):1285-1302. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0708-5.
8
Pharmacovigilance in Europe: Place of the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) in organisation and decisional processes.欧洲的药物警戒:药物警戒风险评估委员会(PRAC)在组织和决策过程中的地位。
Therapie. 2016 Apr;71(2):161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.therap.2016.02.008. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
9
[The new pharmacovigilance legislation in practice].[新药物警戒法规的实际应用]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2014;158:A7129.
10
The reorganisation of European pharmacovigilance. Part 2. From spontaneous reports to agency reviews and decisions.欧洲药物警戒的重组。第2部分。从自发报告到机构审查与决策。
Prescrire Int. 2015 Feb;24(157):50-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterizing ADRs of Enfortumab vedotin and Erdafitinib in bladder cancer treatment: a descriptive analysis from WHO-VigiAccess.恩诺单抗维妥珠单抗和厄达替尼在膀胱癌治疗中的药物不良反应特征:来自世界卫生组织药物警戒数据库的描述性分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Dec 6;15:1503154. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1503154. eCollection 2024.
2
Training and education in pharmacovigilance: The experience from the Pharmacovigilance Programme of India.药物警戒方面的培训与教育:来自印度药物警戒计划的经验。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 1;56(5):348-357. doi: 10.4103/ijp.ijp_638_22. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
3
The role of , and 1639 variants on the susceptibility of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A full case-control study.
1639 变体及其他因素在上消化道出血易感性中的作用:一项全病例对照研究。
J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2023 Jan 30;26:11136. doi: 10.3389/jpps.2023.11136. eCollection 2023.
4
Genetic Variants in and Genes Increase the Risk of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Case-Control Study.[具体基因名称]基因和[具体基因名称]基因中的遗传变异增加上消化道出血风险:一项病例对照研究
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Jul 5;12:671835. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.671835. eCollection 2021.
5
Challenges to the consolidation of pharmacovigilance practices in Brazil: limitations of the hospital pharmacist.巴西药物警戒实践整合面临的挑战:医院药剂师的局限性。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2020 Jul 31;11:2042098620933748. doi: 10.1177/2042098620933748. eCollection 2020.