• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加强和合理化欧盟的药物警戒:欧洲将走向何方?对新的欧盟药物警戒立法的审查。

Strengthening and rationalizing pharmacovigilance in the EU: where is Europe heading to? A review of the new EU legislation on pharmacovigilance.

机构信息

Medicines Authority, Rue D’Argens, Gzira, Malta.

出版信息

Drug Saf. 2011 Mar 1;34(3):187-97. doi: 10.2165/11586620-000000000-00000.

DOI:10.2165/11586620-000000000-00000
PMID:21332243
Abstract

Amendments to the European pharmacovigilance legislative framework are expected to come into force in 2011, following the adoption of the proposed amendments to Directive 2001/83/EC on the community code relating to medicinal products for human use (hereinafter referred to as the Directive) and to Regulation (EC) No. 726/2004 laying down community procedures for the authorization and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use and establishing a European Medicines Agency (EMA) [hereinafter referred to as the Regulation]. The Regulation shall apply 18 months after publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. The amendments to the Directive and the Regulation will induce changes in the EU in terms of evaluation of risk associated with medicinal products as well as the framework on how the EU takes harmonized regulatory action on drug safety. In this review, the text agreed between the European Parliament and Council is examined and compared with the pharmacovigilance legislative framework currently in force. We argue that the new legislation has improved numerous uncertainties in current legislative framework and provides for the following: (i) clear roles, responsibilities and obligations for the key responsible parties; (ii) rationalization of EU decision making on drug safety issues in order to deliver measures that are equally and fully implemented for all relevant products across the community with a view to preventing unnecessary patient exposure to risks; (iii) strengthening medicine safety transparency and communication so that the understanding and trust of patients and health professionals in the safety of medicines will improve, as well as the penetration of key warnings; (iv) strengthening companies' pharmacovigilance systems, allowing companies to improve their systems constantly while reducing administrative burden; (v) ensuring the proactive and proportionate collection of high-quality data relevant to the safety of medicines through risk management and structured data collection in the form of Post-Authorization Safety Studies (PASS), together with rationalized single-case and periodic reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs); (vi) involvement of stakeholders in pharmacovigilance through direct patient reporting of suspected ADRs and inclusion of patients and healthcare professionals in decision making; and (vii) simplification of the current community pharmacovigilance procedures with consequent efficiency gains for both the pharmaceutical industry and medicines regulators. For the first time, companies can be made legally liable to carry out PASS and Post-Authorization Efficacy Studies. The amendments to the Regulation and to the Directive will strengthen the European network on pharmacovigilance. A Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) based at the EMA will be set up, which will be responsible for all matters related to pharmacovigilance at an EU level. Three European databases will be strengthened (EudraVigilance, EudraPharm and the European Pharmacovigilance issues Tracking Tool) as well as the setting up of an EU safety portal to better inform the public on all safety issues being discussed at an EU level. Public hearings at the PRAC will improve transparency in the decision-making process, whilst details and results of all PASS agreed to by the PRAC will also be made publically available.

摘要

预计 2011 年将对欧洲药品监管立法框架进行修订,此前已通过对 2001/83/EC 号指令(以下简称指令)和关于制定共同体人用药品注册程序及设立欧洲药品管理局的法规(EC)No.726/2004(以下简称法规)的拟议修正案进行了修订。该法规将在欧盟官方公报上公布后 18 个月生效。指令和法规的修订将在欧盟药品风险评估和欧盟在药品安全方面采取协调监管行动的框架方面引起变化。在本审查中,审查了欧洲议会和理事会之间达成的案文,并将其与现行的药品监管立法框架进行了比较。我们认为,新立法改进了现行立法框架中的许多不确定性,并规定:(i)为主要责任方明确角色、责任和义务;(ii)为欧盟对药品安全问题的决策合理化,以便采取同等和充分地在共同体范围内实施的措施,以防止不必要的患者面临风险;(iii)加强药品安全透明度和沟通,从而提高患者和卫生专业人员对药品安全性的理解和信任,以及关键警告的渗透;(iv)加强公司的药品监管体系,使公司能够在降低行政负担的同时不断改进其系统;(v)确保通过风险管理和以授权后安全性研究(PASS)形式的结构化数据收集主动、合理地收集与药品安全相关的高质量数据,并合理化疑似药物不良反应(ADR)的单一病例和定期报告;(vi)通过患者疑似 ADR 的直接报告以及将患者和卫生保健专业人员纳入决策,让利益攸关方参与药品监管;以及(vii)简化当前的共同体药品监管程序,从而提高制药行业和药品监管机构的效率。公司首次可以承担法律责任开展 PASS 和授权后疗效研究。法规和指令的修订将加强欧洲药品监管网络。在欧洲药品管理局设立药品监管风险评估委员会(PRAC),负责欧盟层面的所有药品监管事务。将加强三个欧洲数据库(EudraVigilance、EudraPharm 和欧洲药品监管问题跟踪工具),并设立欧盟安全门户,以便更好地向公众通报在欧盟层面上讨论的所有安全问题。PRAC 的公开听证会将提高决策过程的透明度,同时还将公开 PRAC 同意的所有 PASS 的详细信息和结果。

相似文献

1
Strengthening and rationalizing pharmacovigilance in the EU: where is Europe heading to? A review of the new EU legislation on pharmacovigilance.加强和合理化欧盟的药物警戒:欧洲将走向何方?对新的欧盟药物警戒立法的审查。
Drug Saf. 2011 Mar 1;34(3):187-97. doi: 10.2165/11586620-000000000-00000.
2
[The new pharmacovigilance legislation in practice].[新药物警戒法规的实际应用]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2014;158:A7129.
3
Pharmacovigilance in Europe: Place of the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) in organisation and decisional processes.欧洲的药物警戒:药物警戒风险评估委员会(PRAC)在组织和决策过程中的地位。
Therapie. 2016 Apr;71(2):161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.therap.2016.02.008. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
4
A description of signals during the first 18 months of the EMA pharmacovigilance risk assessment committee.欧洲药品管理局药物警戒风险评估委员会头18个月期间的信号描述。
Drug Saf. 2014 Dec;37(12):1059-66. doi: 10.1007/s40264-014-0240-1.
5
European Union pharmacovigilance capabilities: potential for the new legislation.欧盟药物警戒能力:新法规的潜力
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2015 Aug;6(4):120-40. doi: 10.1177/2042098615591802.
6
Lessons learned on the design and the conduct of Post-Authorization Safety Studies: review of 3 years of PRAC oversight.药品上市后安全性研究设计与实施的经验教训:对PRAC三年监督工作的回顾
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Apr;83(4):884-893. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13165. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
7
Promoting and Protecting Public Health: How the European Union Pharmacovigilance System Works.促进和保护公众健康:欧盟药物警戒系统如何运作
Drug Saf. 2017 Oct;40(10):855-869. doi: 10.1007/s40264-017-0572-8.
8
Obstacles to transparency over pharmacovigilance data within the EMA.欧洲药品管理局(EMA)内部药物警戒数据透明度方面的障碍。
Prescrire Int. 2015 Nov;24(165):278-9.
9
Pharmacovigilance Discussion Forum--The European Generic Medicines Association's 8th Annual Meeting (January 21, 2015--London, UK).药物警戒讨论论坛——欧洲仿制药协会第八届年会(2015年1月21日——英国伦敦)
Drugs Today (Barc). 2015 Jan;51(1):89-92. doi: 10.1358/dot.2015.51.1.2285587.
10
Veterinary pharmacovigilance. Part 1. The legal basis in the European Union.兽医药理学警戒。第1部分。欧盟的法律基础。
J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Apr;28(2):131-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2005.00645.x.

引用本文的文献

1
SMS-Based Active Surveillance of Adverse Events following Immunization in Children: The VigiVax Study.基于短信的儿童免疫接种后不良事件主动监测:VigiVax研究
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Sep 20;12(9):1076. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12091076.
2
Comparative Analysis of Information Provided in German Adverse Drug Reaction Reports Sent by Physicians, Pharmacists and Consumers.德国医生、药师和消费者上报的药品不良反应报告中信息的比较分析。
Drug Saf. 2023 Dec;46(12):1363-1379. doi: 10.1007/s40264-023-01355-8. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
3
An Exploratory Study of the Impact of COVID-19 Vaccine Spontaneous Reporting on Masking Signal Detection in EudraVigilance.
COVID-19 疫苗自发报告对 EudraVigilance 中口罩信号检测影响的探索性研究。
Drug Saf. 2023 Nov;46(11):1089-1103. doi: 10.1007/s40264-023-01346-9. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
4
Factors associated with underreporting of adverse drug reactions by patients: a systematic review.与患者不良反应漏报相关的因素:一项系统评价。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2023 Dec;45(6):1349-1358. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01592-y. Epub 2023 May 29.
5
Incidence and patterns of adverse drug reactions among adult patients hospitalized in the University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital: A prospective observational follow-up study.在贡德尔大学综合专科医院住院的成年患者中药物不良反应的发生率和模式:一项前瞻性观察随访研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0282096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282096. eCollection 2023.
6
Regulation Awareness and Experience of Additional Monitoring among Healthcare Professionals in Finland.芬兰医疗保健专业人员的监管意识及额外监测经验
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Nov 11;9(11):1540. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9111540.
7
Beyond the 'purple drank': Study of promethazine abuse according to the European Medicines Agency adverse drug reaction reports.超越“紫色饮料”:根据欧洲药品管理局药物不良反应报告研究苯海拉明滥用情况。
J Psychopharmacol. 2021 Jun;35(6):681-692. doi: 10.1177/0269881120959615. Epub 2021 Jan 10.
8
The ENCePP Code of Conduct: A best practise for scientific independence and transparency in noninterventional postauthorisation studies.《ENCEPP 行为准则》:非干预性上市后研究中科学独立性和透明度的最佳实践。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 Apr;28(4):422-433. doi: 10.1002/pds.4763. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
9
Enhanced passive surveillance of influenza vaccination in England, 2016-2017- an observational study using an adverse events reporting card.2016-2017 年英格兰流感疫苗加强被动监测——使用不良事件报告卡的观察性研究。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(5):1048-1059. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1565258. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
10
Defining the interval for monitoring potential adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) after receipt of live viral vectored vaccines.定义接种活病毒载体疫苗后监测潜在疫苗不良反应(AEFIs)的间隔时间。
Vaccine. 2019 Sep 10;37(38):5796-5802. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.08.085. Epub 2018 Nov 26.