Infection Control Program and WHO Collaborating Centre on Patient Safety, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil 4, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland.
2Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019 Feb 11;8:32. doi: 10.1186/s13756-019-0481-y. eCollection 2019.
Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) affect patients in acute-care hospitals worldwide. No systematic review has been published on adoption and implementation of the infection prevention and control (IPC) key components. The objective of this systematic review was to assess adoption and implementation of the three areas issued by the "National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China" in acute-care hospitals in Mainland China, and to compare the findings with the key and core components on effective IPC, issued by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO).
We searched PubMed and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure for reports on the areas "structure, organisation and management of IPC", "education and training in IPC", and "surveillance of outcome and process indicators in IPC" in acute-care facilities in Mainland China, published between January 2012 and October 2017. Results were stratified into primary care hospitals and secondary/tertiary care hospitals.
A total of 6580 publications were retrieved, of which 56 were eligible for final analysis. Most of them were survey reports ( = 27), followed by observational studies ( = 17), and interventional studies ( = 12), either on hand hygiene promotion and best practice interventions ( = 7), or by applying education and training programmes ( = 5). More elements on IPC were reported by secondary/tertiary care hospitals than by primary care hospitals. Gaps were identified in the lack of detailing on organisation and management of IPC, education and training activities, and targets of surveillance such as central line-associated bloodstream infections, ventilator associated pneumonia, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, and infections. Information was available on adoption and implementation of 7 out of the 10 ECDC key components, and 7 out of the 8 WHO core components.
To variable degrees, there is evidence on implementation of all NHCPRC areas and of most of the ECDC key components and the WHO core components in acute care hospitals in Mainland China. The results are encouraging, but gaps in effective IPC were identified that may be used to guide future national policy-making in Mainland China.
医疗保健相关感染(HAI)和抗微生物药物耐药性(AMR)影响着全球急性护理医院的患者。目前尚未发表过关于感染预防和控制(IPC)关键组成部分的采用和实施情况的系统评价。本系统评价的目的是评估中国内地急性护理医院采用和实施《中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会》发布的三个领域的情况,并将这些发现与欧洲疾病预防控制中心(ECDC)和世界卫生组织(WHO)发布的有效 IPC 的关键和核心组成部分进行比较。
我们检索了 PubMed 和中国国家知识基础设施,以获取 2012 年 1 月至 2017 年 10 月期间发布的中国内地急性医疗机构中“IPC 的结构、组织和管理”、“IPC 的教育和培训”以及“IPC 的结果和过程指标监测”领域的报告。结果分为基层医疗机构和二级/三级医疗机构进行分层。
共检索到 6580 篇文献,其中 56 篇符合最终分析标准。其中大部分是调查报告(=27),其次是观察性研究(=17)和干预性研究(=12),要么是手部卫生促进和最佳实践干预措施(=7),要么是应用教育和培训方案(=5)。二级/三级医疗机构报告的 IPC 要素多于基层医疗机构。在 IPC 的组织和管理、教育和培训活动以及中央导管相关血流感染、呼吸机相关性肺炎、导管相关尿路感染和医院获得性肺炎等监测目标方面,缺乏详细信息。有 7 个 ECDC 关键组成部分和 7 个 WHO 核心组成部分的采用和实施信息。
在不同程度上,有证据表明中国内地急性护理医院实施了《国家卫生健康委员会临床实践指南》的所有领域,以及 ECDC 的大部分关键组成部分和 WHO 的核心组成部分。结果令人鼓舞,但在有效 IPC 方面仍存在差距,这可能有助于指导中国内地未来的国家政策制定。