Narayanan Navaneeth, Rai Rena, Vaidya Parth, Desai Avani, Bhowmick Tanaya, Weinstein Melvin P
Rutgers University, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, 160 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Rutgers University, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2019 Feb 13;6:2049936119828964. doi: 10.1177/2049936119828964. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
Vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia (VRE-B) is a common nosocomial infection associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Daptomycin and linezolid are primary treatment options although definitive clinical data to assess comparative therapeutic effectiveness are lacking. This study assessed the outcomes of patients with VRE-B treated with linezolid or daptomycin. This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study evaluating adult patients with VRE-B treated with either daptomycin or linezolid admitted between January 2012 and August 2016 at a tertiary care, academic medical center. The primary outcome was clinical failure, a composite outcome defined as 14-day in-hospital mortality, microbiologic failure, or relapse of VRE-B. Secondary outcomes included 14-day in-hospital mortality, microbiologic failure, relapse of VRE-B, duration of VRE-B, and antibiotic failure. A multivariate logistic regression model was performed to adjust for potential confounding variables. A total of 93 patients were included ( = 62 for linezolid and = 31 for daptomycin). All blood isolates were . Overall clinical failure was 55.9% and 14-day in-hospital mortality was 21.5%. There was a significantly higher rate of clinical failure in the daptomycin group as compared with the linezolid-treated patients (74.2% 46.8%; = 0.01; respectively). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, there was a significantly higher odds of clinical failure for patients treated with daptomycin as compared with linezolid (adjusted odds ratio 2.89; 95% confidence interval 1.08-7.75) after adjusting for confounders. Secondary outcomes were not statistically significantly different between study groups. Standard-dose (6 mg/kg) daptomycin treatment was associated with a higher rate of clinical failure as compared with linezolid treatment.
耐万古霉素肠球菌菌血症(VRE - B)是一种常见的医院感染,与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。达托霉素和利奈唑胺是主要的治疗选择,尽管缺乏评估比较治疗效果的确切临床数据。本研究评估了接受利奈唑胺或达托霉素治疗的VRE - B患者的治疗结果。这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,评估了2012年1月至2016年8月期间在一家三级医疗学术医学中心住院的接受达托霉素或利奈唑胺治疗的成年VRE - B患者。主要结局是临床失败,这是一个综合结局,定义为14天内住院死亡率、微生物学失败或VRE - B复发。次要结局包括14天内住院死亡率、微生物学失败、VRE - B复发、VRE - B持续时间和抗生素治疗失败。进行了多变量逻辑回归模型以调整潜在的混杂变量。总共纳入了93例患者(利奈唑胺组62例,达托霉素组31例)。所有血液分离株均为[此处原文缺失相关信息]。总体临床失败率为55.9%,14天内住院死亡率为21.5%。与接受利奈唑胺治疗的患者相比,达托霉素组的临床失败率显著更高(分别为74.2%和46.8%;P = 0.01)。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,调整混杂因素后,接受达托霉素治疗的患者临床失败的几率显著高于利奈唑胺治疗的患者(调整后的优势比为2.89;95%置信区间为1.08 - 7.75)。研究组之间的次要结局在统计学上无显著差异。与利奈唑胺治疗相比,标准剂量(6mg/kg)达托霉素治疗的临床失败率更高。