Suppr超能文献

达托霉素与利奈唑胺治疗耐万古霉素肠球菌血症的系统评价和荟萃分析

Daptomycin versus linezolid for treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Chuang Yu-Chung, Wang Jann-Tay, Lin Hsin-Yi, Chang Shan-Chwen

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine and Hospital, 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei 100, Taiwan.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Dec 13;14:687. doi: 10.1186/s12879-014-0687-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Linezolid, which has bacteriostatic activity, is approved for the treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) infections. Meanwhile, daptomycin exerts bactericidal activity against VRE, but is not approved for the treatment of VRE bacteremia. Only a few studies with small sample sizes have compared the effectiveness of these drugs for treatment of VRE bacteremia.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies of VRE bacteremia treatment published before January 1, 2014. All studies reporting daptomycin and linezolid treatment outcomes simultaneously were included. The endpoints were mortality and microbiological cure. The adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of mortality in daptomycin- and linezolid-treated patients were extracted if available. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for all outcomes using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies (532 patients receiving daptomycin, 656 patients receiving linezolid) met the selection criteria. All studies had retrospective cohort designs and relatively small sample sizes. Eight studies compared the aORs of mortality in daptomycin- and linezolid-treated patients. Four studies were published as conference papers and there was significant heterogeneity among these studies (I2 = 63%, p = 0.04). Daptomycin use was not associated with better microbiological cure (daptomycin vs. linezolid, OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.42-1.06, p = 0.09). However, mortality was higher in patients receiving daptomycin (OR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.09-1.86, p = 0.009). Subgroup analysis of studies that reported aORs indicated that daptomycin was associated with higher mortality (OR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.02-2.50, p = 0.04). There was no evidence of publication bias, but all enrolled studies were retrospective, had small sample sizes, and had substantial limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

Although limited data is available, the current meta-analysis shows that linezolid treatment for VRE bacteremia was associated with a lower mortality than daptomycin treatment. However, the results should be interpreted cautiously because of limitations inherent to retrospective studies and the high heterogeneity among studies. A large randomized trial is needed to confirm the present results.

摘要

背景

利奈唑胺具有抑菌活性,已被批准用于治疗耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)感染。同时,达托霉素对VRE具有杀菌活性,但未被批准用于治疗VRE菌血症。仅有少数小样本研究比较了这些药物治疗VRE菌血症的有效性。

方法

检索PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆,查找2014年1月1日前发表的关于VRE菌血症治疗的研究。纳入所有同时报告达托霉素和利奈唑胺治疗结果的研究。终点指标为死亡率和微生物学治愈情况。若有可用数据,提取达托霉素和利奈唑胺治疗患者死亡率的调整优势比(aOR)。使用随机效应模型计算所有结局的合并优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

13项研究(532例接受达托霉素治疗的患者,656例接受利奈唑胺治疗的患者)符合入选标准。所有研究均为回顾性队列设计,样本量相对较小。8项研究比较了达托霉素和利奈唑胺治疗患者死亡率的aOR。4项研究以会议论文形式发表,这些研究之间存在显著异质性(I2 = 63%,p = 0.04)。使用达托霉素与更好的微生物学治愈无关(达托霉素与利奈唑胺相比,OR:0.67,95%CI:0.42 - 1.06,p = 0.09)。然而,接受达托霉素治疗的患者死亡率更高(OR:1.43,95%CI:1.09 - 1.86,p = 0.009)。对报告aOR的研究进行亚组分析表明,达托霉素与更高的死亡率相关(OR:1.59,95%CI:1.02 - 2.50,p = 0.04)。没有证据表明存在发表偏倚,但所有纳入研究均为回顾性研究,样本量小,且有很大局限性。

结论

尽管现有数据有限,但当前的荟萃分析表明,利奈唑胺治疗VRE菌血症的死亡率低于达托霉素治疗。然而,由于回顾性研究固有的局限性以及研究之间的高度异质性,对结果应谨慎解释。需要进行大规模随机试验来证实目前的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d02/4269951/7b1fa7b65f68/12879_2014_Article_687_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验