• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者获取电子健康记录作为社交网络中促进心血管健康的信息寻求与共享指标:一项随机临床试验的二次分析

Electronic health record access by patients as an indicator of information seeking and sharing for cardiovascular health promotion in social networks: Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Brown Sherry-Ann N, Jouni Hayan, Kullo Iftikhar J

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.

出版信息

Prev Med Rep. 2019 Jan 14;13:306-313. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.12.011. eCollection 2019 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.12.011
PMID:30792945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6365362/
Abstract

We investigated electronic health record (EHR) access as an indicator of cardiovascular health promotion by patients in their social networks, by identifying individuals who viewed their coronary heart disease (CHD) risk information in the EHR and shared this information in their social networks among various spheres of influence. In a secondary analysis of the Myocardial Infarction Genes trial, Olmsted County MN residents (2013-2015; n = 203; whites, ages 45-65 years) at intermediate CHD risk were randomized to receive their conventional risk score (CRS; based on traditional risk factors) alone or also their genetic risk score (GRS; based on 28 genomic variants). We assessed self-reported and objectively quantified EHR access via a patient portal at three and six months after risk disclosure, and determined whether this differed by GRS disclosure. Data were analyzed using logistic regression and adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, family history, and baseline CRS/GRS. Self-reported EHR access to view CHD risk information was associated with a high frequency of objectively quantified EHR access (71(10) versus 37(5) logins;  = 0.0025) and a high likelihood of encouraging others to be screened for their CHD risk (OR 2.936, CI 1.443-5.973,  = 0.0030), compared to the absence of self-reported EHR access to view CHD risk information. We thereby used EHR access trends to identify individuals who may function as disseminators of CHD risk information in social networks, compared to individuals on the periphery of their social networks who did not exhibit this behavior. Partnering with such individuals could amplify CHD health promotion. : Myocardial Infarction Genes (MI-GENES) Study, NCT01936675, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01936675.

摘要

我们通过识别在电子健康记录(EHR)中查看其冠心病(CHD)风险信息并在其社交网络中的不同影响范围内分享该信息的个体,研究了EHR访问情况,以此作为患者在其社交网络中促进心血管健康的一个指标。在对心肌梗死基因试验的二次分析中,明尼苏达州奥姆斯特德县中度冠心病风险的居民(2013 - 2015年;n = 203;白人,年龄45 - 65岁)被随机分组,分别单独接受其传统风险评分(CRS;基于传统风险因素)或同时接受其遗传风险评分(GRS;基于28个基因组变异)。在风险披露后的三个月和六个月,我们通过患者门户网站评估了自我报告的和客观量化的EHR访问情况,并确定这是否因GRS披露而有所不同。使用逻辑回归分析数据,并对社会人口学特征、家族史和基线CRS/GRS进行了调整。与未自我报告访问EHR以查看CHD风险信息的情况相比,自我报告访问EHR以查看CHD风险信息与客观量化的EHR高频率访问相关(71(10)次登录与37(5)次登录;P = 0.0025),且更有可能鼓励他人进行CHD风险筛查(OR 2.936,CI 1.443 - 5.973,P = 0.0030)。因此,与社交网络边缘未表现出这种行为的个体相比,我们利用EHR访问趋势来识别可能在社交网络中充当CHD风险信息传播者的个体。与这些个体合作可以扩大CHD健康促进的效果。:心肌梗死基因(MI - GENES)研究,NCT01936675,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01936675 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f31b/6365362/249f12f850b7/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f31b/6365362/3e8f0e4823a6/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f31b/6365362/b4c4ca3b84c9/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f31b/6365362/249f12f850b7/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f31b/6365362/3e8f0e4823a6/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f31b/6365362/b4c4ca3b84c9/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f31b/6365362/249f12f850b7/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Electronic health record access by patients as an indicator of information seeking and sharing for cardiovascular health promotion in social networks: Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.患者获取电子健康记录作为社交网络中促进心血管健康的信息寻求与共享指标:一项随机临床试验的二次分析
Prev Med Rep. 2019 Jan 14;13:306-313. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.12.011. eCollection 2019 Mar.
2
Effect of Disclosing Genetic Risk for Coronary Heart Disease on Information Seeking and Sharing: The MI-GENES Study (Myocardial Infarction Genes).披露冠心病遗传风险对信息寻求与分享的影响:MI-GENES研究(心肌梗死基因研究)
Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2017 Aug;10(4). doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.116.001613.
3
Design of a randomized controlled trial of disclosing genomic risk of coronary heart disease: the Myocardial Infarction Genes (MI-GENES) study.冠心病基因组风险披露的随机对照试验设计:心肌梗死基因(MI-GENES)研究
BMC Med Genomics. 2015 Aug 15;8:51. doi: 10.1186/s12920-015-0122-0.
4
Disclosing Genetic Risk for Coronary Heart Disease: Attitudes Toward Personal Information in Health Records.披露冠心病的遗传风险:对健康记录中个人信息的态度。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Apr;52(4):499-506. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.11.005. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Motivation, Perception, and Treatment Beliefs in the Myocardial Infarction Genes (MI-GENES) Randomized Clinical Trial.心肌梗死基因(MI-GENES)随机临床试验中的动机、认知与治疗信念
J Genet Couns. 2017 Oct;26(5):1153-1161. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0092-9. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
7
Adult patient access to electronic health records.成年患者获取电子健康记录。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 26;2(2):CD012707. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012707.pub2.
8
Shared decision-making following disclosure of coronary heart disease genetic risk: results from a randomized clinical trial.冠心病遗传风险披露后的共同决策:一项随机临床试验的结果
J Investig Med. 2017 Mar;65(3):681-688. doi: 10.1136/jim-2016-000318. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
9
Accessing Patient Electronic Health Record Portals Safely Using Social Credentials: Demonstration Pilot Study.使用社交凭证安全访问患者电子健康记录门户:示范试点研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jan 27;6(1):e29647. doi: 10.2196/29647.
10
Analysis of Employee Patient Portal Use and Electronic Health Record Access at an Academic Medical Center.学术医疗中心的员工患者门户使用和电子健康记录访问情况分析。
Appl Clin Inform. 2020 May;11(3):433-441. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713412. Epub 2020 Jun 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Adult patient access to electronic health records.成年患者获取电子健康记录。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 26;2(2):CD012707. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012707.pub2.
2
Genetic Risk, Adherence to a Healthy Lifestyle, and Coronary Disease.遗传风险、对健康生活方式的坚持与冠心病
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 15;375(24):2349-2358. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1605086. Epub 2016 Nov 13.
3
Clinical Utility of Multimarker Genetic Risk Scores for Prediction of Incident Coronary Heart Disease: A Cohort Study Among Over 51 000 Individuals of European Ancestry.
多标志物遗传风险评分预测冠心病发病的临床效用:一项针对超过51000名欧洲血统个体的队列研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2016 Dec;9(6):531-540. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.116.001522. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
4
Identifying a set of influential spreaders in complex networks.识别复杂网络中的一组有影响力的传播者。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 14;6:27823. doi: 10.1038/srep27823.
5
Cardiovascular Cascade Genetic Testing: Exploring the Role of Direct Contact and Technology.心血管级联基因检测:探索直接接触和技术的作用。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2016 Apr 19;3:11. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2016.00011. eCollection 2016.
6
Incorporating a Genetic Risk Score Into Coronary Heart Disease Risk Estimates: Effect on Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels (the MI-GENES Clinical Trial).将遗传风险评分纳入冠心病风险评估:对低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平的影响(MI-GENES临床试验)
Circulation. 2016 Mar 22;133(12):1181-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.020109. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
7
Disclosing Pleiotropic Effects During Genetic Risk Assessment for Alzheimer Disease: A Randomized Trial.在阿尔茨海默病基因风险评估中揭示多效性效应:一项随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 2;164(3):155-63. doi: 10.7326/M15-0187. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
8
Design of a randomized controlled trial of disclosing genomic risk of coronary heart disease: the Myocardial Infarction Genes (MI-GENES) study.冠心病基因组风险披露的随机对照试验设计:心肌梗死基因(MI-GENES)研究
BMC Med Genomics. 2015 Aug 15;8:51. doi: 10.1186/s12920-015-0122-0.
9
Genetic risk, coronary heart disease events, and the clinical benefit of statin therapy: an analysis of primary and secondary prevention trials.遗传风险、冠心病事件与他汀类药物治疗的临床获益:一项对一级和二级预防试验的分析
Lancet. 2015 Jun 6;385(9984):2264-2271. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61730-X. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
10
Patients' online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic interpretative review.患者对其电子健康记录及相关在线服务的在线访问:一项系统性解释性综述。
BMJ Open. 2014 Sep 8;4(9):e006021. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006021.