• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

披露冠心病遗传风险对信息寻求与分享的影响:MI-GENES研究(心肌梗死基因研究)

Effect of Disclosing Genetic Risk for Coronary Heart Disease on Information Seeking and Sharing: The MI-GENES Study (Myocardial Infarction Genes).

作者信息

Brown Sherry-Ann N, Jouni Hayan, Marroush Tariq S, Kullo Iftikhar J

机构信息

From the Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (S.-A.N.B., H.J., T.S.M., I.J.K.).

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2017 Aug;10(4). doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.116.001613.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.116.001613
PMID:28779015
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5547821/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whether disclosing genetic risk for coronary heart disease (CHD) to individuals influences information seeking and information sharing is not known. We hypothesized that disclosing genetic risk for CHD to individuals influences information seeking and sharing.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The MI-GENES study (Myocardial Infarction Genes) randomized participants (n=203) aged 45 to 65 years who were at intermediate CHD risk based on conventional risk factors and not on statins to receive their conventional risk score alone or also a genetic risk score based on 28 variants. CHD risk was disclosed by a genetic counselor and then discussed with a physician. Surveys assessing information seeking were completed before and after risk disclosure. Information sharing was assessed post-disclosure. Six-month post-disclosure, genetic risk score participants were more likely than conventional risk score participants to visit a website to learn about CHD (odds ratio [OR], 4.88 [confidence interval (CI), 1.55-19.13]; =0.01), use the internet for information about how genetic factors affect CHD risk (OR, 2.11 [CI, 1.03-4.47]; =0.04), access their CHD risk via a patient portal (OR, 2.99 [CI, 1.35-7.04]; =0.01), and discuss their CHD risk with others (OR, 3.13 [CI, 1.41-7.47]; =0.01), particularly their siblings (OR, 1.92 [CI, 1.06-3.51]; =0.03), extended family (OR, 3.8 [CI, 1.37-12.38]; 0.01), coworkers (OR, 2.42 [CI, 1.09-5.76]; =0.03), and primary care provider (PCP; OR, 2.00 [CI, 1.08-3.75]; =0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Disclosure of a genetic risk score for CHD increased information seeking and sharing.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT01936675.

摘要

背景

向个体披露冠心病(CHD)的遗传风险是否会影响信息寻求和信息共享尚不清楚。我们假设向个体披露冠心病的遗传风险会影响信息寻求和共享。

方法与结果

MI-GENES研究(心肌梗死基因研究)将年龄在45至65岁之间、基于传统风险因素而非他汀类药物处于中度冠心病风险的参与者(n = 203)随机分组,使其仅获得传统风险评分或同时获得基于28个变异体的遗传风险评分。遗传咨询师会披露冠心病风险,然后与医生进行讨论。在风险披露前后完成评估信息寻求的调查。在披露后评估信息共享情况。披露六个月后,与仅获得传统风险评分的参与者相比,获得遗传风险评分的参与者更有可能访问网站了解冠心病(优势比[OR],4.88[置信区间(CI),1.55 - 19.13];P = 0.01),利用互联网获取有关遗传因素如何影响冠心病风险的信息(OR,2.11[CI,1.03 - 4.47];P = 0.04),通过患者门户获取其冠心病风险(OR,2.99[CI,1.35 - 7.04];P = 0.01),并与他人讨论其冠心病风险(OR,3.13[CI,1.41 - 7.47];P = 0.01),特别是与他们的兄弟姐妹(OR,1.92[CI,1.06 - 3.51];P = 0.03)、大家庭成员(OR,3.8[CI,1.37 - 12.38];P = 0.01)、同事(OR,2.42[CI,1.09 - 5.76];P = 0.03)以及初级保健提供者(PCP;OR,2.00[CI,1.08 - 3.75];P = 0.03)。

结论

披露冠心病的遗传风险评分增加了信息寻求和共享。

临床试验注册

网址:https://clinicaltrials.gov/。唯一标识符:NCT01936675。

相似文献

1
Effect of Disclosing Genetic Risk for Coronary Heart Disease on Information Seeking and Sharing: The MI-GENES Study (Myocardial Infarction Genes).披露冠心病遗传风险对信息寻求与分享的影响:MI-GENES研究(心肌梗死基因研究)
Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2017 Aug;10(4). doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.116.001613.
2
Design of a randomized controlled trial of disclosing genomic risk of coronary heart disease: the Myocardial Infarction Genes (MI-GENES) study.冠心病基因组风险披露的随机对照试验设计:心肌梗死基因(MI-GENES)研究
BMC Med Genomics. 2015 Aug 15;8:51. doi: 10.1186/s12920-015-0122-0.
3
Shared decision-making following disclosure of coronary heart disease genetic risk: results from a randomized clinical trial.冠心病遗传风险披露后的共同决策:一项随机临床试验的结果
J Investig Med. 2017 Mar;65(3):681-688. doi: 10.1136/jim-2016-000318. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
4
Incorporating a Genetic Risk Score Into Coronary Heart Disease Risk Estimates: Effect on Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels (the MI-GENES Clinical Trial).将遗传风险评分纳入冠心病风险评估:对低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平的影响(MI-GENES临床试验)
Circulation. 2016 Mar 22;133(12):1181-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.020109. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
5
Electronic health record access by patients as an indicator of information seeking and sharing for cardiovascular health promotion in social networks: Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.患者获取电子健康记录作为社交网络中促进心血管健康的信息寻求与共享指标:一项随机临床试验的二次分析
Prev Med Rep. 2019 Jan 14;13:306-313. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.12.011. eCollection 2019 Mar.
6
Motivation, Perception, and Treatment Beliefs in the Myocardial Infarction Genes (MI-GENES) Randomized Clinical Trial.心肌梗死基因(MI-GENES)随机临床试验中的动机、认知与治疗信念
J Genet Couns. 2017 Oct;26(5):1153-1161. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0092-9. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
7
Disclosing Genetic Risk for Coronary Heart Disease: Attitudes Toward Personal Information in Health Records.披露冠心病的遗传风险:对健康记录中个人信息的态度。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Apr;52(4):499-506. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.11.005. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
8
Effect of disclosing a polygenic risk score for coronary heart disease on adverse cardiovascular events: 10-year follow-up of the MI-GENES randomized clinical trial.披露冠心病多基因风险评分对不良心血管事件的影响:MI-GENES随机临床试验的10年随访
medRxiv. 2024 Jul 19:2024.07.19.24310709. doi: 10.1101/2024.07.19.24310709.
9
Association of the platelet glycoprotein IIIa PlA1/A2 gene polymorphism to coronary artery disease but not to nonfatal myocardial infarction in low risk patients.血小板糖蛋白IIIa PlA1/A2基因多态性与冠状动脉疾病相关,但与低风险患者的非致死性心肌梗死无关。
Thromb Haemost. 1998 Aug;80(2):214-7.
10
Association of the Trp719Arg polymorphism in kinesin-like protein 6 with myocardial infarction and coronary heart disease in 2 prospective trials: the CARE and WOSCOPS trials.在两项前瞻性试验(CARE和WOSCOPS试验)中,驱动蛋白样蛋白6中Trp719Arg多态性与心肌梗死和冠心病的关联
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Jan 29;51(4):435-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.05.057.

引用本文的文献

1
Anatomy of the 23andMe fall and implications for consumer genomics.23andMe公司陨落剖析及其对消费级基因检测的启示
Nat Biotechnol. 2025 May 29. doi: 10.1038/s41587-025-02683-z.
2
Clinical utility and implementation of polygenic risk scores for predicting cardiovascular disease: A clinical consensus statement of the ESC Council on Cardiovascular Genomics, the ESC Cardiovascular Risk Collaboration, and the European Association of Preventive Cardiology.用于预测心血管疾病的多基因风险评分的临床效用与应用:欧洲心脏病学会心血管基因组学委员会、欧洲心脏病学会心血管风险协作组及欧洲预防心脏病学协会的临床共识声明
Eur Heart J. 2025 Apr 15;46(15):1372-1383. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae649.
3
Polygenic Risk Score Implementation into Clinical Practice for Primary Prevention of Cardiometabolic Disease.多基因风险评分在心血管代谢疾病一级预防临床实践中的应用
Genes (Basel). 2024 Dec 9;15(12):1581. doi: 10.3390/genes15121581.
4
Effect of disclosing a polygenic risk score for coronary heart disease on adverse cardiovascular events: 10-year follow-up of the MI-GENES randomized clinical trial.披露冠心病多基因风险评分对不良心血管事件的影响:MI-GENES随机临床试验的10年随访
medRxiv. 2024 Jul 19:2024.07.19.24310709. doi: 10.1101/2024.07.19.24310709.
5
Polygenic Risk, Rare Variants, and Family History: Independent and Additive Effects on Coronary Heart Disease.多基因风险、罕见变异与家族史:对冠心病的独立和累加效应
JACC Adv. 2023 Aug 26;2(7):100567. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100567. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
Joint association of genetic risk and accelerometer-measured physical activity with incident coronary artery disease in the UK biobank cohort.英国生物银行队列中基因风险与加速度计测量的身体活动与冠心病发病的联合关联。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 13;19(6):e0304653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304653. eCollection 2024.
7
Simplified rules-based tool to facilitate the application of up-to-date management recommendations in cardio-oncology.基于规则的简化工具,以促进最新心脏肿瘤学管理建议的应用。
Cardiooncology. 2023 Oct 27;9(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s40959-023-00179-w.
8
Education and electronic medical records and genomics network, challenges, and lessons learned from a large-scale clinical trial using polygenic risk scores.教育与电子病历和基因组学网络:一项使用多基因风险评分的大规模临床试验的挑战与经验教训。
Genet Med. 2023 Sep;25(9):100906. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100906. Epub 2023 May 26.
9
Patient similarity and other artificial intelligence machine learning algorithms in clinical decision aid for shared decision-making in the Prevention of Cardiovascular Toxicity (PACT): a feasibility trial design.患者相似性及其他人工智能机器学习算法在预防心血管毒性(PACT)共同决策临床决策辅助中的应用:一项可行性试验设计
Cardiooncology. 2023 Jan 23;9(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40959-022-00151-0.
10
Clinical utility of polygenic risk scores for coronary artery disease.用于冠心病的多基因风险评分的临床实用性。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2022 May;19(5):291-301. doi: 10.1038/s41569-021-00638-w. Epub 2021 Nov 22.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of patient engagement in personalized healthcare.患者参与在个性化医疗中的作用。
Per Med. 2014 Jan;11(1):1-4. doi: 10.2217/pme.13.102.
2
Shared decision-making following disclosure of coronary heart disease genetic risk: results from a randomized clinical trial.冠心病遗传风险披露后的共同决策:一项随机临床试验的结果
J Investig Med. 2017 Mar;65(3):681-688. doi: 10.1136/jim-2016-000318. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
3
Genetic Risk, Adherence to a Healthy Lifestyle, and Coronary Disease.遗传风险、对健康生活方式的坚持与冠心病
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 15;375(24):2349-2358. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1605086. Epub 2016 Nov 13.
4
Clinical Utility of Multimarker Genetic Risk Scores for Prediction of Incident Coronary Heart Disease: A Cohort Study Among Over 51 000 Individuals of European Ancestry.多标志物遗传风险评分预测冠心病发病的临床效用:一项针对超过51000名欧洲血统个体的队列研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2016 Dec;9(6):531-540. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.116.001522. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
5
Psychosocial and Clinical Factors Associated with Family Communication of Cancer Genetic Test Results among Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer at a Young Age.年轻乳腺癌女性患者癌症基因检测结果家庭沟通中的心理社会和临床因素
J Genet Couns. 2017 Feb;26(1):173-181. doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-9995-0. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
6
Information Needs in the Precision Medicine Era: How Genetics Home Reference Can Help.精准医学时代的信息需求:《遗传学家庭参考》如何提供帮助。
Interact J Med Res. 2016 Apr 27;5(2):e13. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.5199.
7
Digital Connectedness in the Framingham Heart Study.弗雷明汉心脏研究中的数字连接性
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Apr 13;5(4):e003193. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003193.
8
The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta-analysis.传达疾病遗传风险对降低风险的健康行为的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ. 2016 Mar 15;352:i1102. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1102.
9
Incorporating a Genetic Risk Score Into Coronary Heart Disease Risk Estimates: Effect on Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels (the MI-GENES Clinical Trial).将遗传风险评分纳入冠心病风险评估:对低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平的影响(MI-GENES临床试验)
Circulation. 2016 Mar 22;133(12):1181-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.020109. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
10
Scanning Health Information Sources: Applying and Extending the Comprehensive Model of Information Seeking.扫描健康信息来源:应用与扩展信息寻求综合模型
J Health Commun. 2016;21(2):208-16. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1058438. Epub 2015 Dec 30.