Matulis John C, Schilling Jason J, North Frederick
Division of Primary Care Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Office of Access Management, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2019 Feb 6;6:2333392819826262. doi: 10.1177/2333392819826262. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
If a patient presents for an acute care visit and sees their assigned primary care provider (PCP), they may be more likely to receive preventive and other services than a patient not seeing their assigned PCP.
After exclusion of 2 visits with insufficient information, we reviewed 98 consecutive, outpatient internal medicine 15-minute acute care visits comparing patients seeing their assigned PCP with those seeing a non-PCP provider. The primary outcome, preventive service ordering, was measured in 2 ways: percentage of patient visits with preventive service ordered and the total number of preventive services ordered as a proportion of all preventive service items due for each entire cohort. The secondary outcome of other work completed was assessed by comparing tests and consults ordered, and by counting the number of physical examination elements and discrete medical diagnoses documented.
The PCPs were significantly more likely than non-PCPs to order any preventive service 45% versus 17% ( = .005; odds ratio [OR]: 4.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.45-12.0). The PCP cohort ordered a higher proportion of the total number of preventive services due compared with the non-PCP cohort (30% vs 11%; = .002; OR: 3.4, CI: 1.5-7.7). The PCPs also addressed more medical diagnoses (2.3 vs 1.4; = .008) and more frequently ordered tests outside the reason for that visit (40% vs 13%; = .003; OR: 4.27, CI: 1.5-11.8).
Patients seeing their assigned PCP in brief, acute visits have higher rates of preventive and other service ordering compared to those not seeing their assigned PCP.
如果患者因急性病就诊并见到其指定的初级保健医生(PCP),那么与未见到指定PCP的患者相比,他们更有可能接受预防和其他服务。
在排除2次信息不足的就诊后,我们回顾了98次连续的门诊内科15分钟急性病就诊情况,比较了见到指定PCP的患者和见到非PCP医生的患者。主要结局,即预防服务的开具,通过两种方式进行衡量:开具预防服务的患者就诊百分比,以及开具的预防服务总数占整个队列应提供的所有预防服务项目的比例。通过比较开具的检查和会诊,并计算记录的体格检查项目数量和离散医学诊断数量,来评估完成的其他工作的次要结局。
PCP开具任何预防服务的可能性显著高于非PCP医生,分别为45%和17%(P = .005;优势比[OR]:4.16,95%置信区间[CI]:1.45 - 12.0)。与非PCP队列相比,PCP队列开具的应提供预防服务总数的比例更高(30%对11%;P = .002;OR:3.4,CI:1.5 - 7.7)。PCP医生还诊断了更多的医学问题(2.3对1.4;P = .008),并且更频繁地开具了超出此次就诊原因的检查(40%对13%;P = .003;OR:4.27,CI:1.5 - 11.8)。
在简短的急性病就诊中,见到指定PCP的患者比未见到指定PCP的患者接受预防和其他服务的比例更高。