Department of Economics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana.
Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Feb 1;181(2):186-194. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.6288.
Disruptions of continuity of care may harm patient outcomes, but existing studies of continuity disruption are limited by an inability to separate the association of continuity disruption from that of other physician-related factors.
To examine changes in health care use and outcomes among patients whose primary care physician (PCP) exited the workforce and to directly measure the association of this primary care turnover with patients' health care use and outcomes.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used nationally representative Medicare billing claims for a random sample of 359 470 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with at least 1 PCP evaluation and management visit from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2017. Primary care physicians who stopped practicing were identified and matched with PCPs who remained in practice. A difference-in-differences analysis compared health care use and clinical outcomes for patients who did lose PCPs with those who did not lose PCPs using subgroup analyses by practice size. Subgroup analyses were done on visits from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2017.
Patients' loss of a PCP.
Primary care, specialty care, urgent care, emergency department, and inpatient visits, as well as overall spending for patients, were the primary outcomes. Receipt of appropriate preventive care and prescription fills were also examined.
During the study period, 9491 of 90 953 PCPs (10.4%) exited Medicare. We matched 169 870 beneficiaries whose PCP exited (37.2% women; mean [SD] age, 71.4 [6.1] years) with 189 600 beneficiaries whose PCP did not exit (36.9% women; mean [SD] age, 72.0 [5.0] years). The year after PCP exit, beneficiaries whose PCP exited had 18.4% (95% CI, -19.8% to -16.9%) fewer primary care visits and 6.2% (95% CI, 5.4%-7.0%) more specialty care visits compared with beneficiaries who did not lose a PCP. This outcome persisted 2 years after PCP exit. Beneficiaries whose PCP exited also had 17.8% (95% CI, 6.0%-29.7%) more urgent care visits, 3.1% (95% CI, 1.6%-4.6%) more emergency department visits, and greater spending ($189 [95% CI, $30-$347]) per beneficiary-year after PCP exit. These shifts were most pronounced for patients of exiting PCPs in solo practice, whose beneficiaries had 21.5% (95% CI, -23.8% to -19.3%) fewer primary care visits, 8.8% (95% CI, 7.6%-10.0%) more specialty care visits, 4.4% more emergency department visits (95% CI, 2.1%-6.7%), and $260 (95% CI, $12-$509) in increased spending.
Loss of a PCP was associated with lower use of primary care and increased use of specialty, urgent, and emergency care among Medicare beneficiaries. Interrupting primary care relationships may negatively impact health outcomes and future engagement with primary care.
连续性护理的中断可能会对患者的治疗效果产生影响,但现有的连续性中断研究受到限制,无法将连续性中断的关联与其他与医生相关的因素区分开来。
研究主要照顾医生(PCP)离职的患者的医疗保健使用和治疗结果的变化,并直接衡量这种初级保健人员流动与患者医疗保健使用和结果之间的关系。
设计、地点和参与者:本队列研究使用了全国代表性的 Medicare 计费索赔数据,对 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间至少有 1 次 PCP 评估和管理就诊的 359470 名 Medicare 收费服务受益人的随机样本进行了分析。确定了停止执业的初级保健医生,并与继续执业的初级保健医生进行了匹配。使用亚组分析按实践规模比较了失去 PCP 的患者和没有失去 PCP 的患者的医疗保健使用和临床结果,采用了差异中的差异分析。亚组分析是在 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间进行的。
患者失去 PCP。
初级保健、专科保健、紧急护理、急诊和住院就诊以及患者的总支出是主要结果。还检查了接受适当预防保健和处方的情况。
在研究期间,90953 名 PCP 中有 9491 名(10.4%)退出了 Medicare。我们匹配了 169870 名 PCP 离职(37.2%为女性;平均[SD]年龄,71.4[6.1]岁)的患者和 189600 名 PCP 未离职(36.9%为女性;平均[SD]年龄,72.0[5.0]岁)的患者。在 PCP 离职后的那一年,与未失去 PCP 的患者相比,失去 PCP 的患者的初级保健就诊次数减少了 18.4%(95% CI,-19.8%至-16.9%),专科就诊次数增加了 6.2%(95% CI,5.4%-7.0%)。这种结果在 PCP 离职后持续了 2 年。失去 PCP 的患者还增加了 17.8%(95% CI,6.0%-29.7%)的紧急护理就诊次数、3.1%(95% CI,1.6%-4.6%)的急诊就诊次数,以及每位患者每年增加的支出(189 美元[95% CI,30 美元至 347 美元])。对于离职 PCP 所在单人执业的患者,这些变化最为明显,他们的患者初级保健就诊次数减少了 21.5%(95% CI,-23.8%至-19.3%),专科就诊次数增加了 8.8%(95% CI,7.6%-10.0%),急诊就诊次数增加了 4.4%(95% CI,2.1%-6.7%),支出增加了 260 美元(95% CI,12 美元至 509 美元)。
失去 PCP 与 Medicare 受益人的初级保健利用率降低和专科、紧急和急诊保健利用率增加有关。中断初级保健关系可能会对健康结果和未来与初级保健的接触产生负面影响。