Suppr超能文献

针对低血压创伤患者的创伤重点超声评估(FAST)常常无法确定是否需要进行剖腹手术:一项多机构实用研究。

The focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) in hypotensive injured patients frequently fails to identify the need for laparotomy: a multi-institutional pragmatic study.

作者信息

Rowell Susan E, Barbosa Ronald R, Holcomb John B, Fox Erin E, Barton Cassie A, Schreiber Martin A

机构信息

Division of Trauma, Critical Care and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Trauma Services, Legacy Emanuel Hospital and Health Center and Randall Children's Hospital, Portland, Oregon, USA.

出版信息

Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2019 Jan 24;4(1):e000207. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2018-000207. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The ability of focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) to detect clinically significant hemorrhage in hypotensive injured patients remains unclear. We sought to describe the sensitivity and specificity of FAST using findings at laparotomy as the confirmatory test.

METHODS

Patients from the Prospective Observational Multicenter Major Trauma Transfusion (PROMMTT) study that had a systolic blood pressure < 90mm Hg and underwent FAST were analysed. Results were compared with findings at laparotomy. A therapeutic laparotomy (T-LAP) was defined as an abdominal operation within 6 hours in which a definitive procedure was performed. The sensitivity and specificity of FAST were calculated.

RESULTS

The cohort included 317 patients that underwent FAST (108 positive, 209 negative). T-LAP was performed in 69% (n=75) of FAST(+) patients and 22% (n=48) of FAST(-) patients. FAST had a sensitivity of 62% and specificity of 83%.

CONCLUSIONS

In our multicenter cohort, 22% of FAST(-) patients underwent T-LAP within 6 hours of admission. In hypotensive patients with a negative FAST, clinicians should still maintain a high index of suspicion for significant abdominal hemorrhage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

摘要

背景

创伤超声重点评估(FAST)检测低血压创伤患者临床显著出血的能力仍不明确。我们试图以剖腹手术结果作为验证性检查来描述FAST的敏感性和特异性。

方法

分析前瞻性观察性多中心严重创伤输血(PROMMTT)研究中收缩压<90mmHg且接受FAST检查的患者。将结果与剖腹手术结果进行比较。治疗性剖腹手术(T-LAP)定义为在6小时内进行确定性手术的腹部手术。计算FAST的敏感性和特异性。

结果

该队列包括317例接受FAST检查的患者(108例阳性,209例阴性)。69%(n = 75)的FAST(+)患者和22%(n = 48)的FAST(-)患者接受了T-LAP。FAST的敏感性为62%,特异性为83%。

结论

在我们的多中心队列中,22%的FAST(-)患者在入院后6小时内接受了T-LAP。对于FAST检查阴性的低血压患者,临床医生仍应高度怀疑存在显著的腹腔内出血。

证据级别

四级。

相似文献

8
Emergency ultrasound-based algorithms for diagnosing blunt abdominal trauma.基于急诊超声的钝性腹部创伤诊断算法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 14;2015(9):CD004446. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004446.pub4.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Is the FAST exam reliable in severely injured patients?在严重受伤的患者中,FAST 检查可靠吗?
Injury. 2010 May;41(5):479-83. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.10.054. Epub 2009 Nov 26.
10
Clinician-performed focused sonography for the resuscitation of trauma.临床医生实施的创伤复苏重点超声检查
Crit Care Med. 2007 May;35(5 Suppl):S162-72. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000260627.97284.5D.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验