Udobi K F, Rodriguez A, Chiu W C, Scalea T M
Department of Surgery, Kansas University School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
J Trauma. 2001 Mar;50(3):475-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200103000-00011.
Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) is rapidly establishing its place in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma. However, no prospective study specifically evaluates its role in penetrating abdominal trauma.
Data were collected prospectively in 75 consecutive stable patients with penetrating trauma to the abdomen, flank, or back, from December 1998 to June 1999. Those with an obvious need for emergent laparotomy were excluded. FAST was performed as the initial diagnostic study on all patients. Wound location, type of weapon, and findings of diagnostic peritoneal lavage, triple-contrast computed tomographic scan, or laparotomy were recorded. The presence of peritoneal blood was noted. Data were analyzed using the chi(2) test.
Of the 75 patients, there were 32 stab and 43 gunshot wounds. There were 66 male patients and 9 female patients; the mean age was 30 years; 41 had proven abdominal injury and 34 had no injury; and 21 patients had a positive FAST. Nineteen had peritoneal blood and injuries requiring repair at the time of laparotomy. There were two false-positive studies. Fifty-four patients had a negative FAST. In 32 patients, this was a true-negative study. Thirteen patients had a false-negative FAST and had peritoneal blood and significant injury on further evaluation. Nine patients had a negative FAST and no peritoneal blood but still had abdominal injuries requiring operative repair, including liver (four), small bowel (four), diaphragm (three), colon (three), and stomach (one). The overall sensitivity of FAST was 46% and the specificity was 94%. The positive predictive value was 90%, and the negative predictive value was 60%.
FAST can be a useful initial diagnostic study after penetrating abdominal trauma. A positive FAST is a strong predictor of injury, and patients should proceed directly to laparotomy. If negative, additional diagnostic studies should be performed to rule out occult injury.
创伤超声重点评估(FAST)在钝性腹部创伤评估中迅速确立了其地位。然而,尚无前瞻性研究专门评估其在穿透性腹部创伤中的作用。
前瞻性收集了1998年12月至1999年6月期间75例连续的腹部、侧腹或背部穿透伤稳定患者的数据。排除明显需要急诊剖腹手术的患者。对所有患者进行FAST作为初始诊断检查。记录伤口位置、武器类型以及诊断性腹腔灌洗、三对比计算机断层扫描或剖腹手术的结果。记录腹腔内有无积血。采用卡方检验进行数据分析。
75例患者中,有32例刺伤和43例枪伤。男性患者66例,女性患者9例;平均年龄30岁;41例经证实有腹部损伤,34例无损伤;21例患者FAST检查阳性。19例腹腔内有积血且在剖腹手术时需要修复损伤。有2例假阳性检查。54例患者FAST检查阴性。其中32例为真阴性检查。13例患者FAST检查假阴性,进一步评估发现腹腔内有积血且有严重损伤。9例患者FAST检查阴性且腹腔内无积血,但仍有需要手术修复的腹部损伤,包括肝脏(4例)、小肠(4例)、膈肌(3例)、结肠(3例)和胃(1例)。FAST的总体敏感性为46%,特异性为94%。阳性预测值为90%,阴性预测值为60%。
FAST可作为穿透性腹部创伤后的一项有用的初始诊断检查。FAST检查阳性强烈提示有损伤,患者应直接进行剖腹手术。如果检查结果为阴性,则应进行其他诊断检查以排除隐匿性损伤。