Department of Communication, Media and Film, Faculty of Arts, University of Calgary, Social Sciences Building, Room 320, 618 Campus Place NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
Health Promot Int. 2020 Apr 1;35(2):432-444. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daz007.
Education and literacy are important aspects of health promotion. The potential for health literacy to promote healthier choices has been widely examined, with studies variously incorporating food literacy, nutrition literacy and/or media literacy as components of health literacy, rather than treating each as unique concepts for health promotion. This study examines similarities and differences across health literacy, food literacy, nutrition literacy and health-promoting media literacy to highlight how each literacy type theorizes the relationship between education and health. A meta-review of existing scoping and systematic reviews examining literacy conceptualizations was conducted to examine the four literacies. Representative concept definitions were extracted and key competencies (or skills) and desired consequences were identified and grouped into subcategories for analysis. This study located 378 articles, of which 17 scoping/systematic reviews were included (10 for health literacy, 3 for food, 1 for nutrition and 3 for media). Representative concept definitions of the four literacy types revealed three skill categories (information acquisition, information analysis, and the application of information) and three categories of desired consequences (knowledge, attitudes and behaviors), with each of the four literacy types emphasizing varied collections of skills and desired consequences. Despite perceived similarities in content, health, food, nutrition and media literacy conceptualize the relationship between education and health differently, emphasizing the distinct types of knowledge to promote health-related outcomes. A better understanding of the differences between these four literacies will lead to informed decision making for researchers, educators and health practitioners in intervention design and implementation.
教育和文化素养是健康促进的重要方面。健康素养在促进更健康选择方面的潜力已得到广泛研究,研究将食品素养、营养素养和/或媒体素养作为健康素养的组成部分,而不是将其视为促进健康的独特概念。本研究考察了健康素养、食品素养、营养素养和促进健康的媒体素养之间的异同,以突出每种素养类型如何理论化教育与健康之间的关系。对现有的文献回顾和系统评价进行了元评价,以考察这四种素养。提取了代表性的概念定义,并确定了关键能力(或技能)和期望的结果,并将其分组为分析的子类别。本研究共找到了 378 篇文章,其中包括 17 篇文献回顾和系统评价(10 篇关于健康素养,3 篇关于食品素养,1 篇关于营养素养,3 篇关于媒体素养)。这四种素养类型的代表性概念定义揭示了三个技能类别(信息获取、信息分析和信息应用)和三个期望结果类别(知识、态度和行为),这四种素养类型都强调了不同的技能和期望结果。尽管内容上存在相似之处,但健康、食品、营养和媒体素养对教育与健康之间的关系有不同的理解,强调了促进与健康相关结果的不同类型的知识。更好地理解这四种素养之间的差异将为研究人员、教育工作者和健康从业者在干预设计和实施中做出明智的决策提供依据。