N. Shohat, A. Fleischman, M. Tarabichi, T. L. Tan, J. Parvizi, The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA N. Shohat, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Oct;476(10):1964-1969. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000141.
Although morbid obesity is considered a modifiable risk factor for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), there is no consensus regarding an appropriate threshold for body mass index (BMI) above which a high risk for infection may outweigh the benefits of surgery.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is there a BMI cutoff threshold that is associated with increased risk for PJI? (2) Is the risk of PJI increased in higher obesity classes?
A retrospective study was conducted of all primary THAs and TKAs performed at one institution between 2006 and 2015. Overall 19,226 patients were eligible to be included in the study; 1053 patients were excluded as a result of incomplete data, resulting in a final cohort of 18,173 patients (8757 TKAs and 9416 THAs). PJI was defined using the International Consensus Meeting criteria. To ensure accurate followup, and because there is evidence to support the association between obesity and early infection, we identified PJI within 90 days of the index surgery. This relationship was examined separately for BMI as a continuous variable and for each BMI category as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (underweight ≤ 18.49 kg/m; normal 18.5-24.9 kg/m; overweight 25-29.9 kg/m; obese class I 30-34.9 kg/m; obese class II 35-39.9 kg/m; obese class III ≥ 40 kg/m). Analyses were performed with logistic regression, accounting for both patient and surgical risk factors. A BMI threshold was evaluated with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the Youden index.
The area under the ROC curve for BMI and risk of PJI within 90 days was only 0.58 (confidence interval [CI], 0.52-0.63) suggesting such a cutoff was not much better than random chance. Among the BMI classes, patients with class III obesity (≥ 40 kg/m) were the only ones showing a higher risk for PJI within 90 days (odds ratio [OR], 3.09 [1.46-6.54]; p = 0.003). The risk of developing PJI was not greater for overweight (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.38-1.4), class I obese (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.57-2.0), or class II obese (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.52-2.2) patients. Underweight patients also demonstrated no increased risk for PJI (OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 0.23-13.9).
The risk for infection increases gradually throughout the full range of BMI, but no threshold exists. Weight reduction before surgery may mitigate risk for infection for all patients with a BMI above normal. Of note, patients with a BMI > 40 kg/m carried a threefold higher risk for PJI and for these patients, the risks of surgery must be carefully weighed against its benefits.
Level III, therapeutic study.
虽然病态肥胖被认为是假体周围关节感染(PJI)的可修正风险因素,但对于 BMI 超过多少会增加感染风险而超过手术获益,目前尚无共识。
问题/目的:(1)是否存在与 PJI 风险增加相关的 BMI 截止阈值?(2)更高的肥胖等级是否会增加 PJI 的风险?
对一家机构 2006 年至 2015 年期间进行的所有初次全膝关节置换术(TKA)和初次全髋关节置换术(THA)进行了回顾性研究。共有 19226 名患者符合纳入研究标准;1053 名患者由于数据不完整而被排除,最终纳入了 18173 名患者(TKA 8757 例,THA 9416 例)。使用国际共识会议标准来定义 PJI。为了确保准确的随访,并且因为有证据表明肥胖与早期感染之间存在关联,我们在索引手术 90 天内确定了 PJI。使用逻辑回归分别检查 BMI 作为连续变量和疾病预防控制中心(CDC)定义的每个 BMI 类别(体重不足≤18.49kg/m2;正常 18.5-24.9kg/m2;超重 25-29.9kg/m2;肥胖 I 级 30-34.9kg/m2;肥胖 II 级 35-39.9kg/m2;肥胖 III 级≥40kg/m2)的这种关系。分析考虑了患者和手术风险因素。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和约登指数评估 BMI 阈值。
90 天内 BMI 和 PJI 风险的 ROC 曲线下面积仅为 0.58(置信区间 [CI],0.52-0.63),这表明这样的截止值并不比随机机会好多少。在 BMI 类别中,肥胖 III 级(≥40kg/m2)患者是唯一在 90 天内发生 PJI 风险更高的患者(优势比 [OR],3.09 [1.46-6.54];p=0.003)。超重(OR,0.72;95%CI,0.38-1.4)、肥胖 I 级(OR,1.06;95%CI,0.57-2.0)或肥胖 II 级(OR,1.08;95%CI,0.52-2.2)患者发生 PJI 的风险并未增加。体重不足患者也没有增加发生 PJI 的风险(OR,1.80;95%CI,0.23-13.9)。
感染风险在整个 BMI 范围内逐渐增加,但不存在截止阈值。手术前减肥可能会降低所有 BMI 高于正常的患者的感染风险。值得注意的是,BMI>40kg/m2 的患者发生 PJI 的风险增加了三倍,对于这些患者,必须仔细权衡手术的风险和获益。
III 级,治疗性研究。