Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, United States of America.
New College of Florida, Sarasota, Florida, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 22;14(2):e0212226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212226. eCollection 2019.
Indirect methods for conducting faunal inventories present great promise, and genomic inventories derived from environmental sources (eDNA) are improving. Invertebrate ingested DNA (iDNA) from terrestrial leeches in the family Haemadipsidae has shown potential for surveying vertebrates and biodiversity monitoring in protected areas. Here we present an initial, and critical, evaluation of the limitations and biases of current iDNA protocols for biodiversity monitoring using both standard and NGS barcoding approaches. Key findings include the need for taxon relevant multi-locus markers and reference databases. In particular, the limitations of available reference databases have profound potential to mislead and bias eDNA and iDNA results if not critically interpreted. Nevertheless, there is great potential for recovery of amplifiable DNA from gut contents of invertebrate museum specimens which may reveal both temporal patterns and cryptic diversity in protected areas with increased efficiency. Our analyses of ingested DNA (iDNA) from both freshly stored and previously collected (legacy) samples of terrestrial leeches successfully identified vertebrates from Myanmar, Australia and Madagascar and indicate the potential to characterize microbial communities, pathogen diversity and interactions at low cost.
间接方法进行动物区系编目具有很大的前景,并且从环境来源(eDNA)得出的基因组编目正在得到改善。来自蛭形科陆地水蛭的无脊椎动物摄入 DNA(iDNA)已显示出在保护区调查脊椎动物和生物多样性监测方面的潜力。在这里,我们使用标准和 NGS 条形码方法,对使用 iDNA 进行生物多样性监测的当前 iDNA 协议的局限性和偏差进行了初步和关键的评估。主要发现包括需要与分类群相关的多基因座标记和参考数据库。特别是,如果不进行批判性解释,现有参考数据库的局限性极有可能导致 eDNA 和 iDNA 结果产生误导和偏差。尽管如此,如果从无脊椎动物博物馆标本的肠道内容物中成功回收可扩增 DNA,仍有很大的潜力揭示保护区内的时间模式和隐蔽多样性,从而提高效率。我们对来自缅甸、澳大利亚和马达加斯加的新鲜保存和以前收集(遗留)的陆地水蛭的摄入 DNA(iDNA)进行的分析成功地鉴定了脊椎动物,并表明有潜力以低成本描述微生物群落、病原体多样性和相互作用。