Schnell Ida Bærholm, Sollmann Rahel, Calvignac-Spencer Sébastien, Siddall Mark E, Yu Douglas W, Wilting Andreas, Gilbert M Thomas P
Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark ; Center for Zoo and Wild Animal Health, Copenhagen Zoo, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany ; Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, North Carolina, Raleigh USA ; Present address: US Forest Service, Pacific Southwest 17 Research Station, 1731 Research Park Drive, Davis, CA 95618 USA.
Front Zool. 2015 Oct 1;12:24. doi: 10.1186/s12983-015-0115-z. eCollection 2015.
Invertebrate-derived DNA (iDNA) from terrestrial haematophagous leeches has recently been proposed as a powerful non-invasive tool with which to detect vertebrate species and thus to survey their populations. However, to date little attention has been given to whether and how this, or indeed any other iDNA-derived data, can be combined with state-of-the-art analytical tools to estimate wildlife abundances, population dynamics and distributions. In this review, we discuss the challenges that face the application of existing analytical methods such as site-occupancy and spatial capture-recapture (SCR) models to terrestrial leech iDNA, in particular, possible violations of key assumptions arising from factors intrinsic to invertebrate parasite biology. Specifically, we review the advantages and disadvantages of terrestrial leeches as a source of iDNA and summarize the utility of leeches for presence, occupancy, and spatial capture-recapture models. The main source of uncertainty that attends species detections derived from leech gut contents is attributable to uncertainty about the spatio-temporal sampling frame, since leeches retain host-blood for months and can move after feeding. Subsequently, we briefly address how the analytical challenges associated with leeches may apply to other sources of iDNA. Our review highlights that despite the considerable potential of leech (and indeed any) iDNA as a new survey tool, further pilot studies are needed to assess how analytical methods can overcome or not the potential biases and assumption violations of the new field of iDNA. Specifically we argue that studies to compare iDNA sampling with standard survey methods such as camera trapping, and those to improve our knowledge on leech (and other invertebrate parasite) physiology, taxonomy, and ecology will be of immense future value.
陆生吸血水蛭来源的无脊椎动物衍生DNA(iDNA)最近被认为是一种强大的非侵入性工具,可用于检测脊椎动物物种并调查其种群数量。然而,迄今为止,很少有人关注这种iDNA数据或任何其他iDNA衍生数据是否以及如何能够与最先进的分析工具相结合,以估计野生动物的数量、种群动态和分布。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了将现有分析方法(如位点占用和空间捕获-重捕(SCR)模型)应用于陆生水蛭iDNA时所面临的挑战,特别是无脊椎动物寄生虫生物学内在因素可能导致的关键假设的违反。具体而言,我们回顾了陆生水蛭作为iDNA来源的优缺点,并总结了水蛭在位点存在、占用和空间捕获-重捕模型中的效用。水蛭肠道内容物中物种检测的主要不确定性来源归因于时空采样框架的不确定性,因为水蛭会在数月内保留宿主血液,并且进食后会移动。随后,我们简要讨论了与水蛭相关的分析挑战如何可能适用于其他iDNA来源。我们的综述强调,尽管水蛭(实际上是任何)iDNA作为一种新的调查工具具有巨大潜力,但仍需要进一步的试点研究来评估分析方法如何能够克服或无法克服iDNA新领域潜在的偏差和假设违反问题。具体而言,我们认为将iDNA采样与相机陷阱等标准调查方法进行比较的研究,以及那些提高我们对水蛭(和其他无脊椎动物寄生虫)生理学、分类学和生态学认识的研究将具有巨大的未来价值。