Instituto de Medicina Genómica (imegen), Paterna, Valencia, Spain.
Haematology Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain.
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 22;14(2):e0212708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212708. eCollection 2019.
The analysis of molecular haematopoietic chimerisms (HC) has become a well-established method to monitor the transplant evolution and to assess the risk of relapse after allogeneic stem cells transplantation (allo-STC). Different techniques and molecular markers are being used for chimerism surveillance after transplantation, including quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) and the recently developed digital PCR (dPCR). This study aims to compare the sensitivity and accuracy of both methods to quantify HC and predict early relapse.
HC was evaluated using custom PCR systems for the specific detection of the Y-chromosome, null alleles and insertion-deletion polymorphisms. A total of 281 samples from 28 adult patients who underwent an allo-SCT were studied. Increasing mixed chimerism was detected prior to relapse in 100% of patients (18 relapses).
Compared with conventional qPCR amplification, dPCR predicted relapse with a median anticipation period of 63 days versus 45.5 days by qPCR. Overall, 56% of the relapses were predicted earlier with dPCR whereas 38% of the relapses where detected simultaneously using both techniques and only in 1 case, relapse was predicted earlier with qPCR.
In conclusion, chimerism determination by dPCR constitutes a suitable technique for the follow-up of patients with haematological pathologies after allo-STC, showing greater sensitivity to predict an early relapse.
分子血液学嵌合体(HC)分析已成为监测移植演变和评估异基因干细胞移植(allo-STC)后复发风险的成熟方法。在移植后,有多种技术和分子标记物用于嵌合体监测,包括实时定量 PCR(qPCR)和最近开发的数字 PCR(dPCR)。本研究旨在比较这两种方法在定量 HC 和预测早期复发方面的灵敏度和准确性。
使用针对 Y 染色体、无效等位基因和插入缺失多态性的定制 PCR 系统评估 HC。研究了 28 名接受 allo-SCT 的成年患者的 281 个样本。在 100%的患者(18 例复发)中,在复发前检测到了逐渐增加的混合嵌合体。与传统的 qPCR 扩增相比,dPCR 预测复发的中位提前期为 63 天,而 qPCR 为 45.5 天。总体而言,dPCR 提前预测了 56%的复发,而 38%的复发同时通过两种技术检测到,只有在 1 例中,qPCR 提前预测了复发。
总之,dPCR 确定嵌合体构成了异基因造血系统后血液病理学患者随访的合适技术,对预测早期复发具有更高的灵敏度。