Suppr超能文献

长期护理机构感染预防和控制计划的有效性及其核心组成部分:系统评价。

Effectiveness and core components of infection prevention and control programmes in long-term care facilities: a systematic review.

机构信息

The Research Institute of Nursing Science, College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 2019 Aug;102(4):377-393. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Feb 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Infection prevention and control (IPC) is a measure to prevent healthcare-associated infections in healthcare settings. There is limited evidence of the effectiveness of IPC programmes in long-term care facilities (LTCFs).

AIM

To review and analyse the effectiveness and the components of IPC programmes in LTCFs for older adults.

METHODS

Electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane CENTRAL) were searched systematically for English-language articles assessing IPC interventions in LTCFs, published over the last decade (2007-2016). The components of IPC programmes were analysed based on the World Health Organization (WHO) manuals for improving IPC activities. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of studies using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and the risk-of-bias assessment tool for non-randomized studies.

FINDINGS

Seventeen studies met the eligibility criteria; 10 studies were randomized trials (58.8%) and the others were non-randomized trials to examine the impact of IPC programmes on infection and/or performance outcomes of healthcare workers. None of the included studies implemented all of the WHO core components. Behavioural change strategies using education, monitoring and feedback were reported to be successful interventions for reducing the threat of healthcare-associated infections. Generally, studies using four or more elements of the WHO multi-modal strategy reported significant reductions in infection rates.

CONCLUSIONS

There is some evidence for the effectiveness of IPC interventions using education, monitoring, feedback and four or more elements of the WHO multi-modal strategy to control healthcare-associated infections in LTCFs.

摘要

背景

感染预防与控制(IPC)是预防医疗机构中发生医源性感染的一项措施。然而,IPC 方案在长期护理机构(LTCF)中的有效性的证据有限。

目的

综述和分析针对老年人的 LTCF 中 IPC 方案的有效性和组成部分。

方法

系统检索了英文文献数据库(PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 Cochrane CENTRAL),以评估过去十年(2007-2016 年)发表的评估 LTCF 中 IPC 干预措施的文章。根据世界卫生组织(WHO)改善 IPC 活动手册分析了 IPC 方案的组成部分。两位评审员使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具和非随机研究偏倚风险评估工具独立评估了研究的质量。

结果

有 17 项研究符合纳入标准;其中 10 项为随机试验(58.8%),其余为非随机试验,以检验 IPC 方案对医护人员感染和/或绩效结果的影响。没有一项纳入的研究实施了所有的 WHO 核心组成部分。使用教育、监测和反馈的行为改变策略被报道为降低医源性感染威胁的有效干预措施。一般来说,使用 WHO 多模式策略的四个或更多要素的研究报告称感染率显著降低。

结论

有一些证据表明,IPC 干预措施使用教育、监测、反馈和 WHO 多模式策略的四个或更多要素来控制 LTCF 中的医源性感染是有效的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验