Harper Sara A, Roberts Lisa M, Layne Andrew S, Jaeger Byron C, Gardner Anna K, Sibille Kimberly T, Wu Samuel S, Vincent Kevin R, Fillingim Roger B, Manini Todd M, Buford Thomas W
Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35205, USA.
Center for Exercise Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35205, USA.
J Clin Med. 2019 Feb 21;8(2):265. doi: 10.3390/jcm8020265.
In a pilot randomized clinical trial, participants aged ≥60 years ( = 35) with physical limitations and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) were randomized to 12 weeks of lower-body low-load resistance training with blood-flow restriction (BFR) or moderate-intensity resistance training (MIRT) to evaluate changes in muscle strength, pain, and physical function. Four exercises were performed three times per week to volitional fatigue using 20% and 60% of one repetition maximum (1RM). Study outcomes included knee extensor strength, gait speed, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) performance, and pain via the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC). Per established guidance for pilot studies, primary analyses for the trial focused on safety, feasibility, and effect sizes/95% confidence intervals of dependent outcomes to inform a fully-powered trial. Across three speeds of movement, the pre- to post-training change in maximal isokinetic peak torque was 9.96 (5.76, 14.16) Nm while the mean difference between groups (BFR relative to MIRT) was -1.87 (-10.96, 7.23) Nm. Most other directionally favored MIRT, though more spontaneous reports of knee pain were observed ( = 14) compared to BFR ( = 3). BFR may have lower efficacy than MIRT in this context-though a fully-powered trial is needed to definitively address this hypothesis.
在一项试点随机临床试验中,年龄≥60岁(n = 35)、有身体功能受限且患有症状性膝关节骨关节炎(OA)的参与者被随机分为两组,一组进行为期12周的下肢低负荷血流限制阻力训练(BFR),另一组进行中等强度阻力训练(MIRT),以评估肌肉力量、疼痛和身体功能的变化。每周进行三次四项练习,直至达到自觉疲劳,使用一次重复最大值(1RM)的20%和60%。研究结果包括膝关节伸肌力量、步态速度、简短身体功能量表(SPPB)表现,以及通过西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评估的疼痛情况。根据既定的试点研究指南,该试验的主要分析集中在安全性、可行性以及相关结果的效应量/95%置信区间,以为全面的试验提供参考。在三种运动速度下,训练前至训练后的最大等速峰值扭矩变化为9.96(5.76,14.16)牛米,而两组之间的平均差异(BFR相对于MIRT)为-1.87(-10.96,7.23)牛米。大多数其他方面更倾向于MIRT,不过与BFR组(n = 3)相比,观察到更多膝关节疼痛的自发报告(n = 14)。在这种情况下,BFR的疗效可能低于MIRT——尽管需要进行全面试验来明确验证这一假设。